Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-08-01 Thread Bastien
Hi Charles,

Charles Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu writes:

 The docstring for `org-preview-latex-fragment' still says:

 The images can be removed again with \\[org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c].

 Maybe change that to \\[org-preview-latex-fragment]?

Fixed, thanks.  `org-preview-latex-fragment' is now named
`org-toggle-latex-fragment'.

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-31 Thread Charles Berry
Bastien bzg at gnu.org writes:

 
 Hi Nick,
 
 Nick Dokos ndokos at gmail.com writes:
 
  getting rid of just latex fragment undoing in
  org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c and toggling with C-c C-x C-l is probably the best
  solution.
 
 Agreed, this is the case now in master.


The docstring for `org-preview-latex-fragment' still says:

The images can be removed again with \\[org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c].

Maybe change that to \\[org-preview-latex-fragment]?

HTH,

Chuck




Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-28 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Aaron Ecay wrote:
 I don’t have a comment on the substance of the proposal, but rather two
 suggestions for workarounds.

 The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
 rather than C-c C-c.

Or even `e' if:

- on the first character of the #+begin_src keyword, and
- speed keys are enabled (not by default!?)

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban




Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-28 Thread Bastien
Hi Nick,

Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:

 getting rid of just latex fragment undoing in
 org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c and toggling with C-c C-x C-l is probably the best
 solution.

Agreed, this is the case now in master.

 It probably would be a good idea to make the handling of clock
 overlays similar as well and make C-c C-x C-d toggle the clock overlay
 state

Clock overlays are clearly transient, while LaTeX fragments are more
or less permanent -- so allowing C-c C-c for getting rid of clock
overlays seems fine to me.  But clearly a subjective point of view.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-16 Thread Andreas Leha
Hi all,

John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:

 I am using org-mode files with equations and code blocks in lectures,
 and it is problematic that C-c C-c removes the equation overlays when
 running a code block. First, you have to press C-c C-c twice to run the
 block, since the first one gets rid of the equations, but then you have
 run C-c C-x C-l to get the equations back! and the cycle repeats
 throughout a lecture.

 I would prefer that the equations stay untouched, and that the code
 blocks run without modifying them. 

 I think the best behavior would be for C-c C-x C-l to toggle the
 equations, and to remove the C-c C-c behavior for latex overlays
 completely.

Since this thread focusses on work arounds and local customizations so
far, let me just say, that I completely agree here.  What is the
reasoning behind the current key binding?  Is there any benefit over
using the same key binding to toggle the state?

[...]

Regards,
Andreas




Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-16 Thread Nick Dokos
Andreas Leha andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de writes:

 Hi all,

 John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:

 I am using org-mode files with equations and code blocks in lectures,
 and it is problematic that C-c C-c removes the equation overlays when
 running a code block. First, you have to press C-c C-c twice to run the
 block, since the first one gets rid of the equations, but then you have
 run C-c C-x C-l to get the equations back! and the cycle repeats
 throughout a lecture.

 I would prefer that the equations stay untouched, and that the code
 blocks run without modifying them. 

 I think the best behavior would be for C-c C-x C-l to toggle the
 equations, and to remove the C-c C-c behavior for latex overlays
 completely.

 Since this thread focusses on work arounds and local customizations so
 far, let me just say, that I completely agree here.  What is the
 reasoning behind the current key binding?  Is there any benefit over
 using the same key binding to toggle the state?


I'm inclined to agree too: I imagine it would be very annoying after
a while.

There are three things that C-c C-c currently undoes in an ad-hoc
fashion. The first cond clause in the function looks like this:

,
|((or (and (boundp 'org-clock-overlays) org-clock-overlays)
|   org-occur-highlights
|   org-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
| (and (boundp 'org-clock-overlays) (org-clock-remove-overlays))
| (org-remove-occur-highlights)
| (org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
| (message Temporary highlights/overlays removed from current buffer))
`

So if there are clock overlays or occur highlights or latex fragment
image overlays, they are undone and the function is finished. This seems
like a separate issue from the main thrust of what C-c C-c does (and it
does a lot), so my inclination would be to suggest that each of the
above conditions be togglable, using the standard keybinding for each
(C-c C-x C-l for latex fragment image overlay toggling, C-c C-x C-d for
clock display - occur highlights only happen from org-goto with the /
keybinding, but there is no org-global keybinding I believe).

However there is a variable that modifies that behavior:

,
| org-remove-highlights-with-change is a variable defined in `org.el'.
| Its value is t
| 
| Documentation:
| Non-nil means any change to the buffer will remove temporary highlights.
| Such highlights are created by `org-occur' and `org-clock-display'.
| When nil, `C-c C-c needs to be used to get rid of the highlights.
| The highlights created by `org-preview-latex-fragment' always need
| `C-c C-c' to be removed.
`

If most of us leave that variable's value at default, the ad-hoc-kery
probably does not raise its head except for latex fragments. If that's
the case, then getting rid of just latex fragment undoing in
org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c and toggling with C-c C-x C-l is probably the best
solution. It probably would be a good idea to make the handling of clock
overlays similar as well and make C-c C-x C-d toggle the clock overlay
state (I'd be inclined to take that out of org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c as well,
since I suspect that almost nobody uses it, given the variable above and
its default value - but that's only a hunch).  That would leave only
occur highlights to be undone by org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c - which is ugly but
the function is a kitchen-sink kind of function anyway, so that's
probably OK.

Alternatively, make org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c undo these things as it does
today, but only with a triple prefix arg (which afaict is not used
today).

As Nicolas would say, WDYT?

-- 
Nick




Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-16 Thread John Kitchin
That is nice. For those of us using windows sometimes, you can kind of
get super and hyper keys (see
http://ergoemacs.org/emacs/emacs_hyper_super_keys.html). Although,
without also using autohotkey, your super keys are limited because
windows uses some of them (e.g.s-e launches explorer). H-e works fine.

Grant Rettke g...@wisdomandwonder.com writes:

 C-c C-v C-e might seem like a lot but it nice to have control and be
 sure when code is getting evaluated.

 That said, I do have a more obvious one using super which is indeed, super:

 (local-set-key (kbd s-t) 'org-babel-tangle)
 (local-set-key (kbd s-e) 'org-babel-execute-maybe)
 Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
 g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
 “Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
 ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
 “Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
 taking it seriously.” --Thompson


 On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:00 PM, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
 I actually love C-c C-c to run code blocks! Maybe I should just bind it
 to f5 or something, I am just so used to C-cC-c now!

 Grant Rettke g...@wisdomandwonder.com writes:

 On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
 The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
 rather than C-c C-c.

 Like this?

 (setq org-babel-no-eval-on-ctrl-c-ctrl-c +1)



 --
 ---
 John Kitchin
 Professor
 Doherty Hall A207F
 Department of Chemical Engineering
 Carnegie Mellon University
 Pittsburgh, PA 15213
 412-268-7803
 http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



-- 
---
John Kitchin
Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-16 Thread John Kitchin
DOH! thanks, that is exactly what I forgot to do. This works fine after
you activate it! Thanks.

Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:

 John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:

 Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com writes:

 Thanks for the advice idea, that is a nice one. It doesn't work for me
 like this though:

 #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
 (defadvice org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c (around latex-overlays)
   ignore latex overlays in C-cC-c
   (let ((org-latex-fragment-image-overlays nil))
 ad-do-it))
 #+END_SRC

 maybe because that is a buffer local variable?


 You probably forgot to activate it:

 (ad-activate 'org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c)

-- 
---
John Kitchin
Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-16 Thread John Kitchin
I favor the toggling behavior. There is an org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook
variable that can always have functions in it that keep the current
behavior, but that can be removed if they are not desired.

John

Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:

 Andreas Leha andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de writes:

 Hi all,

 John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:

 I am using org-mode files with equations and code blocks in lectures,
 and it is problematic that C-c C-c removes the equation overlays when
 running a code block. First, you have to press C-c C-c twice to run the
 block, since the first one gets rid of the equations, but then you have
 run C-c C-x C-l to get the equations back! and the cycle repeats
 throughout a lecture.

 I would prefer that the equations stay untouched, and that the code
 blocks run without modifying them. 

 I think the best behavior would be for C-c C-x C-l to toggle the
 equations, and to remove the C-c C-c behavior for latex overlays
 completely.

 Since this thread focusses on work arounds and local customizations so
 far, let me just say, that I completely agree here.  What is the
 reasoning behind the current key binding?  Is there any benefit over
 using the same key binding to toggle the state?


 I'm inclined to agree too: I imagine it would be very annoying after
 a while.

 There are three things that C-c C-c currently undoes in an ad-hoc
 fashion. The first cond clause in the function looks like this:

 ,
 |((or (and (boundp 'org-clock-overlays) org-clock-overlays)
 | org-occur-highlights
 | org-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
 | (and (boundp 'org-clock-overlays) (org-clock-remove-overlays))
 | (org-remove-occur-highlights)
 | (org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
 | (message Temporary highlights/overlays removed from current buffer))
 `

 So if there are clock overlays or occur highlights or latex fragment
 image overlays, they are undone and the function is finished. This seems
 like a separate issue from the main thrust of what C-c C-c does (and it
 does a lot), so my inclination would be to suggest that each of the
 above conditions be togglable, using the standard keybinding for each
 (C-c C-x C-l for latex fragment image overlay toggling, C-c C-x C-d for
 clock display - occur highlights only happen from org-goto with the /
 keybinding, but there is no org-global keybinding I believe).

 However there is a variable that modifies that behavior:

 ,
 | org-remove-highlights-with-change is a variable defined in `org.el'.
 | Its value is t
 | 
 | Documentation:
 | Non-nil means any change to the buffer will remove temporary highlights.
 | Such highlights are created by `org-occur' and `org-clock-display'.
 | When nil, `C-c C-c needs to be used to get rid of the highlights.
 | The highlights created by `org-preview-latex-fragment' always need
 | `C-c C-c' to be removed.
 `

 If most of us leave that variable's value at default, the ad-hoc-kery
 probably does not raise its head except for latex fragments. If that's
 the case, then getting rid of just latex fragment undoing in
 org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c and toggling with C-c C-x C-l is probably the best
 solution. It probably would be a good idea to make the handling of clock
 overlays similar as well and make C-c C-x C-d toggle the clock overlay
 state (I'd be inclined to take that out of org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c as well,
 since I suspect that almost nobody uses it, given the variable above and
 its default value - but that's only a hunch).  That would leave only
 occur highlights to be undone by org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c - which is ugly but
 the function is a kitchen-sink kind of function anyway, so that's
 probably OK.

 Alternatively, make org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c undo these things as it does
 today, but only with a triple prefix arg (which afaict is not used
 today).

 As Nicolas would say, WDYT?

-- 
---
John Kitchin
Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-15 Thread John Kitchin
I actually love C-c C-c to run code blocks! Maybe I should just bind it
to f5 or something, I am just so used to C-cC-c now!

Grant Rettke g...@wisdomandwonder.com writes:

 On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
 The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
 rather than C-c C-c.

 Like this?

 (setq org-babel-no-eval-on-ctrl-c-ctrl-c +1)



-- 
---
John Kitchin
Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-15 Thread John Kitchin
Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com writes:

Thanks for the advice idea, that is a nice one. It doesn't work for me
like this though:

#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(defadvice org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c (around latex-overlays)
  ignore latex overlays in C-cC-c
  (let ((org-latex-fragment-image-overlays nil))
ad-do-it))
#+END_SRC

maybe because that is a buffer local variable?

 Hi John,

 2014ko uztailak 14an, John Kitchin-ek idatzi zuen:
 
 I am using org-mode files with equations and code blocks in lectures,
 and it is problematic that C-c C-c removes the equation overlays when
 running a code block. First, you have to press C-c C-c twice to run the
 block, since the first one gets rid of the equations, but then you have
 run C-c C-x C-l to get the equations back! and the cycle repeats
 throughout a lecture.
 
 I would prefer that the equations stay untouched, and that the code
 blocks run without modifying them. 
 
 I think the best behavior would be for C-c C-x C-l to toggle the
 equations, and to remove the C-c C-c behavior for latex overlays
 completely. But it would be ok if this was done by a C-c C-c hook
 function, so that a user could remove the latex overlay without touching
 the org-code.
 
 Maybe a new function like this:
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
 (defun org-toggle-latex-overlays (arg)
   Toggle LaTeX fragments.
   (interactive P)
   (if org-latex-fragment-image-overlays
   (org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
 (org-preview-latex-fragment arg)))
 #+END_SRC
 
  could be added. Any thoughts?

 I don’t have a comment on the substance of the proposal, but rather two
 suggestions for workarounds.

 The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
 rather than C-c C-c.

 The second is to let-bind ‘org-latex-fragment-image-overlays’ to nil
 in an advice around the ‘org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c’ function, allowing you to
 still use the more convenient C-c C-c binding.

-- 
---
John Kitchin
Professor
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-15 Thread Nick Dokos
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:

 Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com writes:

 Thanks for the advice idea, that is a nice one. It doesn't work for me
 like this though:

 #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
 (defadvice org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c (around latex-overlays)
   ignore latex overlays in C-cC-c
   (let ((org-latex-fragment-image-overlays nil))
 ad-do-it))
 #+END_SRC

 maybe because that is a buffer local variable?


You probably forgot to activate it:

(ad-activate 'org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c)

-- 
Nick




Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-15 Thread Grant Rettke
C-c C-v C-e might seem like a lot but it nice to have control and be
sure when code is getting evaluated.

That said, I do have a more obvious one using super which is indeed, super:

(local-set-key (kbd s-t) 'org-babel-tangle)
(local-set-key (kbd s-e) 'org-babel-execute-maybe)
Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:00 PM, John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
 I actually love C-c C-c to run code blocks! Maybe I should just bind it
 to f5 or something, I am just so used to C-cC-c now!

 Grant Rettke g...@wisdomandwonder.com writes:

 On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
 The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
 rather than C-c C-c.

 Like this?

 (setq org-babel-no-eval-on-ctrl-c-ctrl-c +1)



 --
 ---
 John Kitchin
 Professor
 Doherty Hall A207F
 Department of Chemical Engineering
 Carnegie Mellon University
 Pittsburgh, PA 15213
 412-268-7803
 http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu



[O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-14 Thread John Kitchin
I am using org-mode files with equations and code blocks in lectures,
and it is problematic that C-c C-c removes the equation overlays when
running a code block. First, you have to press C-c C-c twice to run the
block, since the first one gets rid of the equations, but then you have
run C-c C-x C-l to get the equations back! and the cycle repeats
throughout a lecture.

I would prefer that the equations stay untouched, and that the code
blocks run without modifying them. 

I think the best behavior would be for C-c C-x C-l to toggle the
equations, and to remove the C-c C-c behavior for latex overlays
completely. But it would be ok if this was done by a C-c C-c hook
function, so that a user could remove the latex overlay without touching
the org-code.

Maybe a new function like this:

#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(defun org-toggle-latex-overlays (arg)
  Toggle LaTeX fragments.
  (interactive P)
  (if org-latex-fragment-image-overlays
  (org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
(org-preview-latex-fragment arg)))
#+END_SRC

 could be added. Any thoughts?



-- 
---
John Kitchin
Professor




Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-14 Thread Aaron Ecay
Hi John,

2014ko uztailak 14an, John Kitchin-ek idatzi zuen:
 
 I am using org-mode files with equations and code blocks in lectures,
 and it is problematic that C-c C-c removes the equation overlays when
 running a code block. First, you have to press C-c C-c twice to run the
 block, since the first one gets rid of the equations, but then you have
 run C-c C-x C-l to get the equations back! and the cycle repeats
 throughout a lecture.
 
 I would prefer that the equations stay untouched, and that the code
 blocks run without modifying them. 
 
 I think the best behavior would be for C-c C-x C-l to toggle the
 equations, and to remove the C-c C-c behavior for latex overlays
 completely. But it would be ok if this was done by a C-c C-c hook
 function, so that a user could remove the latex overlay without touching
 the org-code.
 
 Maybe a new function like this:
 
 #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
 (defun org-toggle-latex-overlays (arg)
   Toggle LaTeX fragments.
   (interactive P)
   (if org-latex-fragment-image-overlays
   (org-remove-latex-fragment-image-overlays)
 (org-preview-latex-fragment arg)))
 #+END_SRC
 
  could be added. Any thoughts?

I don’t have a comment on the substance of the proposal, but rather two
suggestions for workarounds.

The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
rather than C-c C-c.

The second is to let-bind ‘org-latex-fragment-image-overlays’ to nil
in an advice around the ‘org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c’ function, allowing you to
still use the more convenient C-c C-c binding.

-- 
Aaron Ecay



Re: [O] proposal to make C-c C-c not remove latex overlays

2014-07-14 Thread Grant Rettke
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
 The first is to use the C-c C-v C-e binding to execute source blocks
 rather than C-c C-c.

Like this?

(setq org-babel-no-eval-on-ctrl-c-ctrl-c +1)