Re: [O] putting a element +UWa in table
William Henney writes: > Assuming you never want to use strike-through text (who does?), you > can customise (or otherwise modify) the variable `org-emphasis-alist` > to remove the entry for "+". Er, yes, of course! Thanks William, -- Bastien
Re: [O] putting a element +UWa in table
Assuming you never want to use strike-through text (who does?), you can customise (or otherwise modify) the variable `org-emphasis-alist` to remove the entry for "+". Will On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Bastien wrote: > Neal Becker writes: > > > How do I put such an item in a table without org table > > misinterpreting it? > > You can't. > > -- > Bastien > > -- Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia
Re: [O] putting a element +UWa in table
Neal Becker writes:
> The first item in my table should say '+UWa'. This seems to upset the
> org table gods, who draw a line through my entry.
>
> How do I put such an item in a table without org table misinterpreting it?
For curiosity I played a bit on this problem.
I got no exact solution, but here's what I found.
I guess they aren't exactly *cough* the most
didactic Org tricks ever... Cheers,
Andrea
- Test1: shows overstrike on text (as per Org syntax)
| +UWa UWb+ |
- Test 2: shows "+" in buffer if org-toggle-pretty-entities
is enabled, but produces bad HTML export (a subscript "nil"
appears)
| \plus_{}UWa UWb\plus_{} |
- Test 3: looks OK for HTML, Latex, ASCII export
#+MACRO: myplus @@html:+latex:+ascii:+@@
| {{{myplus}}}UWa UWb{{{myplus}}} |
Re: [O] putting a element +UWa in table
Neal Becker writes: > How do I put such an item in a table without org table > misinterpreting it? You can't. -- Bastien
[O] putting a element +UWa in table
The first item in my table should say '+UWa'. This seems to upset the org table gods, who draw a line through my entry. How do I put such an item in a table without org table misinterpreting it?
