Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > On 11/21/18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> You can use a zero-width space, like +++. > > that trick does not work on ===. What does not work, exactly? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
On 11/21/18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > You can use a zero-width space, like +++. that trick does not work on ===.
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
Hello, John Kitchin writes: > hm. I would have interpreted it as an empty string with a strikethrough, > followed by a plus. It makes sense to require 1 or more characters > between them though. > > Why is +-+ not a - with a strikethrough? Because it is a table line? It was a bug I was not very motivated to fix. It should now be fixed on the export side, at least. I.e., "+-+" is exported as a strike-through. > Or + + is not a space with a strikethrough. I guess there are word > boundaries required. Striking through nothing doesn't make sense, does it? In any case, blanks are forbidden in the inner part of the markers. > I thought it was interesting that ++ + and + ++ show no strikethrough, but > ++ ++ does. Evidently a strikethrough on + +. An editor, on the other > hand, might want to strikeout excess spaces. We have to strike a balance here. Allowing emphasis markup around spaces has more cons than pros, IMO. > It isn't a big deal, I just changed the editmark syntax to avoid > clashing with org-syntax. The real issue here is that you're trying to bend Org syntax to fit a foreign syntax. It may imply pain. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
hm. I would have interpreted it as an empty string with a strikethrough, followed by a plus. It makes sense to require 1 or more characters between them though. Why is +-+ not a - with a strikethrough? Because it is a table line? Or + + is not a space with a strikethrough. I guess there are word boundaries required. I thought it was interesting that ++ + and + ++ show no strikethrough, but ++ ++ does. Evidently a strikethrough on + +. An editor, on the other hand, might want to strikeout excess spaces. It isn't a big deal, I just changed the editmark syntax to avoid clashing with org-syntax. Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > John Kitchin writes: > >> That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as >> strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That >> was a good hint though. > > IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign > be excluded from strike-through? > > You can use a zero-width space, like +++. > > Regards, -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
Hello, John Kitchin writes: > That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as > strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That > was a good hint though. IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign be excluded from strike-through? You can use a zero-width space, like +++. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
Hello, John Kitchin writes: > That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as > strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That > was a good hint though. IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign be excluded from strike-through? You can use a zero-width space, like +++. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
Hello, John Kitchin writes: > That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as > strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That > was a good hint though. IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign be excluded from strike-through? You can use a zero-width space, like +++. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as
strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That
was a good hint though.
I was able to add + to the border component of the regexp components which
seems to have fixed the problem for me for now.
(setq org-emphasis-regexp-components '("- ('\"{" ;pre
"- .,:!?;'\")}\\[" ;post
"\\+
" ;border
"."
1))
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:54 PM Berry, Charles wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 19, 2018, at 6:08 PM, John Kitchin
> wrote:
> >
> > I was looking at https://github.com/joostkremers/criticmarkup-emacs
> again recently and ran into something I don't recall happening before.
> >
> > There is a markup for inserting text thatlooks like {++Insert this
> text++}. However, in org-mode this is marked up as strikethrough. Is there
> a way to make that not happen?
> >
>
>
>
> customize org-emphasis-alist I would think
>
> HTH,
>
> Chuck
>
Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
> On Nov 19, 2018, at 6:08 PM, John Kitchin wrote:
>
> I was looking at https://github.com/joostkremers/criticmarkup-emacs again
> recently and ran into something I don't recall happening before.
>
> There is a markup for inserting text thatlooks like {++Insert this text++}.
> However, in org-mode this is marked up as strikethrough. Is there a way to
> make that not happen?
>
customize org-emphasis-alist I would think
HTH,
Chuck
[O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?
I was looking at https://github.com/joostkremers/criticmarkup-emacs again
recently and ran into something I don't recall happening before.
There is a markup for inserting text thatlooks like {++Insert this text++}.
However, in org-mode this is marked up as strikethrough. Is there a way to
make that not happen?
John
---
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
