[Orgmode] Question about agenda

2008-10-08 Thread Robert Goldman
I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
with notes from a meeting.  The header for this item is as follows:

* Tasks
...
* * Meeting with 
  SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
...

What I was somewhat surprised to see was that this continues to roll
down my agenda, e.g.:


Wednesday   8 October 2008
  smite:  Sched. 3x:  Meeting with X


I think this means that I don't really understand the meaning of
SCHEDULED, nor do I understand how the agendas are composed.  But I'm
looking at the info manual now, and I'm not actually enlightened.

Is there something I should do to tag something SCHEDULED like this so
that it no longer appears in my agenda view as something still to be
done?  Is there a HAPPENED tag, or something like that?

Or, is it the case that I should only use SCHEDULED with todo items?

Any guidance much appreciated.

Best,
R





___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Question about agenda

2008-10-08 Thread Manish
  On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
  > I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
  > with notes from a meeting.  The header for this item is as follows:
  >
  > * Tasks
  > ...
  > * * Meeting with 
  >  SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
  > ...
  >
  > What I was somewhat surprised to see was that this continues to roll
  > down my agenda, e.g.:
  >
  > 
  > Wednesday   8 October 2008
  >  smite:  Sched. 3x:  Meeting with X
  > 
  >
  > I think this means that I don't really understand the meaning of
  > SCHEDULED, nor do I understand how the agendas are composed.  But I'm
  > looking at the info manual now, and I'm not actually enlightened.
  >
  > Is there something I should do to tag something SCHEDULED like this so
  > that it no longer appears in my agenda view as something still to be
  > done?  Is there a HAPPENED tag, or something like that?

When something is SCHEDULED it continues to appear in agenda as long
as it is not marked DONE.  You can do that (marking something DONE)
using C-c C-d in the Org file or using "t" from agenda view.

-- Manish


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Question about agenda

2008-10-08 Thread Robert Goldman
Manish wrote:
>   On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>   > I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
>   > with notes from a meeting.  The header for this item is as follows:
>   >
>   > * Tasks
>   > ...
>   > * * Meeting with 
>   >  SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
>   > ...
>   >
>   > What I was somewhat surprised to see was that this continues to roll
>   > down my agenda, e.g.:
>   >
>   > 
>   > Wednesday   8 October 2008
>   >  smite:  Sched. 3x:  Meeting with X
>   > 
>   >
>   > I think this means that I don't really understand the meaning of
>   > SCHEDULED, nor do I understand how the agendas are composed.  But I'm
>   > looking at the info manual now, and I'm not actually enlightened.
>   >
>   > Is there something I should do to tag something SCHEDULED like this so
>   > that it no longer appears in my agenda view as something still to be
>   > done?  Is there a HAPPENED tag, or something like that?
> 
> When something is SCHEDULED it continues to appear in agenda as long
> as it is not marked DONE.  You can do that (marking something DONE)
> using C-c C-d in the Org file or using "t" from agenda view.
> 

OK.  But that does seem weird to me.  Meetings seem like things that
should be scheduled, but they are not TODO items, so they don't seem
like the sort of thing that should get a TODO marker (which it what
"DONE" is), and they don't seem like the sort of thing that should
require an active dismissal.

So it seems like "SCHEDULED" is just the Wrong Thing for stuff like my
meeting.  Is there any different flag I could use that would give me a
single appearance in the Agenda?

thanks,
r


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Question about agenda

2008-10-08 Thread Manish
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Manish wrote:
>>   On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
>>   > I have an org file which the agenda sees in which I put an outline item
>>   > with notes from a meeting.  The header for this item is as follows:
>>   >
>>   > * Tasks
>>   > ...
>>   > * * Meeting with 
>>   >  SCHEDULED: <2008-10-06 Mon>
>>   > ...
>>   >
>>   > What I was somewhat surprised to see was that this continues to roll
>>   > down my agenda, e.g.:
>>   >
>>   > 
>>   > Wednesday   8 October 2008
>>   >  smite:  Sched. 3x:  Meeting with X
>>   > 
>>   >
>>   > I think this means that I don't really understand the meaning of
>>   > SCHEDULED, nor do I understand how the agendas are composed.  But I'm
>>   > looking at the info manual now, and I'm not actually enlightened.
>>   >
>>   > Is there something I should do to tag something SCHEDULED like this so
>>   > that it no longer appears in my agenda view as something still to be
>>   > done?  Is there a HAPPENED tag, or something like that?
>>
>> When something is SCHEDULED it continues to appear in agenda as long
>> as it is not marked DONE.  You can do that (marking something DONE)
>> using C-c C-d in the Org file or using "t" from agenda view.
>>
>
> OK.  But that does seem weird to me.  Meetings seem like things that
> should be scheduled, but they are not TODO items, so they don't seem
> like the sort of thing that should get a TODO marker (which it what
> "DONE" is), and they don't seem like the sort of thing that should
> require an active dismissal.

Most of my meetings are of recurring nature so I never really thought
about this but I see what you mean.

>
> So it seems like "SCHEDULED" is just the Wrong Thing for stuff like my
> meeting.  Is there any different flag I could use that would give me a
> single appearance in the Agenda?

I am sorry I am not aware of any such TODO keyword/tag.  I was not
aware of an item appearing just once if SCHEDULED keyword was omitted
as suggested by Bernt.  (He almost always teaches me something new
every time.)

-- Manish


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Question about agenda

2008-10-08 Thread Eric Schulte
Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>
>> So it seems like "SCHEDULED" is just the Wrong Thing for stuff like my
>> meeting.  Is there any different flag I could use that would give me a
>> single appearance in the Agenda?
>
> I am sorry I am not aware of any such TODO keyword/tag.  I was not
> aware of an item appearing just once if SCHEDULED keyword was omitted
> as suggested by Bernt.  (He almost always teaches me something new
> every time.)
>

This is the first I've read of this conversation so please forgive if
I'm repeating something that's already been said.  I agree that the
behavior of the SCHEDULED keyword is counter-intuitive.  For all of my
meetings I just include a time stamp C-c. (cntrl-c period) in the header

* one time meeting <2008-10-08 Wed 11:00>

or for repeating meetings

* weekly meeting <2008-10-08 Wed 11:00 +1w>

-- Eric

>
> -- Manish
>
>
> ___
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode