Re: [Orgmode] RFI -- Which completion system?

2010-10-22 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:16:19 +0200, Sébastien Vauban 
 wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Before spending a lot of time trying to choose for the "best" completion
> mechanism inside Emacs (and sticking to it), setting it up all the way
> through, I wanted to know if you had had:
> 
> - particularly good or bad experiences with one of the "standard" ones?

I've tried a number over the years.  I've yet to reach a situation
where I am particularly happy with any of them but the one that seems
to work best *for me* so far is hippie.

I have the following settings (having just added Tassilo's expansion
function for calc which is brilliant!):

--8<---cut here---start->8---
(setq hippie-expand-try-functions-list
  '(;;yas/hippie-try-expand
th/my-try-complete-with-calc-result
try-expand-all-abbrevs
try-expand-dabbrev
try-expand-dabbrev-all-buffers
try-expand-dabbrev-from-kill
try-complete-file-name
try-complete-lisp-symbol))
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

I no longer use yasnippets as they interfered too much with completion
in general.  

I have bound hippie-expand to C-; as I find this a lot easier to type
than M-/.  I also have TAB bound to the following:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
(defun esf/indent-or-expand (arg)
  "Either indent according to mode, or expand the word preceding point."
  (interactive "*P")
  (if (and
   (or (bobp) (= ?w (char-syntax (char-before
   (or (eobp) (not (= ?w (char-syntax (char-after))
  ;;(dabbrev-expand arg)
  (hippie-expand arg)
(indent-according-to-mode)))
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

in most text buffers.  This means that TAB no longer does what it
should in org mode but I use C-i for that functionality as most of the
time I am typing text and not moving things around.

HTH,
eric
-- 
Eric S Fraga
GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29  570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] RFI -- Which completion system?

2010-10-21 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hello,

Before spending a lot of time trying to choose for the "best" completion
mechanism inside Emacs (and sticking to it), setting it up all the way
through, I wanted to know if you had had:

- particularly good or bad experiences with one of the "standard" ones?

- things to notice regarding the integration with Org?

>From the many that do exist -- and which conflict in my =.emacs= file! --,
I've spotted the following ones of being of real interest:

- dabbrev
- hippie-expand
- pabbrev
- company

Any comment on this?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode