Re: [Orgmode] Re: Basic orgmode tutorial

2010-03-25 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Memnon Anon wrote:


Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:


Yes, exactly. I want to counter some of the recent pessimism on this
topic. Org-mode is very attractive to people in its own right, and  
as it

happens it is implemented in emacs. I know one person who has used
org-mode constantly for a couple of years now, purely for the  
agenda and
todo lists, without ever aquiring any ability or interest in using  
emacs

per se. She knows the keys to change TODO states, set timestamps and
call up the agenda and that was all that was needed. Although only
scraping the surface of what org-mode can do, the fact that someone  
who

otherwise only uses MS Word and firefox is still using org-mode after
two years says something *extremely* positive about org-mode.

[...]
That also brings up the question of org-CUA-compatible -- would  
that be

set in this putative newbie org configuration?

[...]
So what I am saying is that org-mode is sufficiently attractive  
that we
should expect non-emacs users to be attracted to it, and that we  
should

be optimistic about the ability of such people to start using
org-mode. And that yes, we need to work on the configuration for  
them.


I recently installed emacs for a co-student of mine, just to give her
the ability to have the outline. She struggled with organizing her  
notes
on her research (first semester ;), so I suggested to her to have a  
look

at the outline tools out there; after she tried some of the solutions
available, I finally showed her orgmode, and she really chose org.
Reason: Cleaner look, less clutter: Some of the menus in the other
programs were overwhelming for her and org offered her exactly what  
she
wanted. She is a student with average computer/software knowledge:  
Watch

movies, use firefox, use openoffice. And thats it.

I will ask her for feedback, I haven't spoken to her lately.

One thing, however, I noticed at once:
I installed for her the official emacs windows build, and the  
inconsistent
mouse usage was a problem. Inconsistent not in itself, just  
different to

what she learned and expects how mouse, copy and paste, selecting text
etc. works. It broke her pattern of usage, and it was interesting to
see, how confusing that is from an outside perspective. ;).

I wish I had chosen Lennart Borgmanns Built, which, I guess - I am on
linux only, comes with a more sensible set of preconfigurations.

Memnon

...

P.S.: Crazy idea: Would it be possible to use the mouse to move
 Headlines like M-up/M-down does? I do not understand it, but  
again

 and again I see computerusers cherishing their beloved rodent.
 Even heavy computer users find it hard to remember keystrokes.
 Or they are just unwilling to invest the effort ...


I believe that org-mouse.el might have some limited support for this.

- Carsten



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Basic orgmode tutorial

2010-03-24 Thread Memnon Anon
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:

 Yes, exactly. I want to counter some of the recent pessimism on this
 topic. Org-mode is very attractive to people in its own right, and as it
 happens it is implemented in emacs. I know one person who has used
 org-mode constantly for a couple of years now, purely for the agenda and
 todo lists, without ever aquiring any ability or interest in using emacs
 per se. She knows the keys to change TODO states, set timestamps and
 call up the agenda and that was all that was needed. Although only
 scraping the surface of what org-mode can do, the fact that someone who
 otherwise only uses MS Word and firefox is still using org-mode after
 two years says something *extremely* positive about org-mode.
[...]
 That also brings up the question of org-CUA-compatible -- would that be
 set in this putative newbie org configuration?
[...]
 So what I am saying is that org-mode is sufficiently attractive that we
 should expect non-emacs users to be attracted to it, and that we should
 be optimistic about the ability of such people to start using
 org-mode. And that yes, we need to work on the configuration for them.

I recently installed emacs for a co-student of mine, just to give her 
the ability to have the outline. She struggled with organizing her notes
on her research (first semester ;), so I suggested to her to have a look
at the outline tools out there; after she tried some of the solutions
available, I finally showed her orgmode, and she really chose org.
Reason: Cleaner look, less clutter: Some of the menus in the other 
programs were overwhelming for her and org offered her exactly what she
wanted. She is a student with average computer/software knowledge: Watch
movies, use firefox, use openoffice. And thats it.

I will ask her for feedback, I haven't spoken to her lately.

One thing, however, I noticed at once: 
I installed for her the official emacs windows build, and the inconsistent
mouse usage was a problem. Inconsistent not in itself, just different to
what she learned and expects how mouse, copy and paste, selecting text
etc. works. It broke her pattern of usage, and it was interesting to
see, how confusing that is from an outside perspective. ;). 

I wish I had chosen Lennart Borgmanns Built, which, I guess - I am on
linux only, comes with a more sensible set of preconfigurations.

Memnon

...

P.S.: Crazy idea: Would it be possible to use the mouse to move
  Headlines like M-up/M-down does? I do not understand it, but again
  and again I see computerusers cherishing their beloved rodent.
  Even heavy computer users find it hard to remember keystrokes.
  Or they are just unwilling to invest the effort ... 



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Basic orgmode tutorial

2010-03-23 Thread Memnon Anon
Hi,
Alexander Poslavsky alexander.poslav...@gmail.com writes:

 attached is an updated version of the file, added agenda and some lines on 
 gtd and exporting.

I just read it and you did a great job so far; I will have a closer look
later again, sadly I am very busy right now :(.

Just one suggestion: I think it would be nice to have a Further
Reading Subsection at the end of each Section, containing links to the 
org manual pages, tutorials on this topic, FAQ Entries, screencasts,
whatever.

Tutorials are an excellent starting point, but they also great to look
up what you recently learned and are tinkering with. Lets say I read the
tutorial and tried the Clocking. Then, suddenly, I realize I am not
sure how I can really integrate this feature into a workflow. First
thing I would do is return to my tutorial and reread the section.
If the limited information there [its a tutorial, it is by definition
limited], I would really appreciate a Further Reading Section, linking
e.g. to Bernt Hansens excellent infos on his clock usage, like:

* [[http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#Clocking][Bernt Hansens extensive
description Time Clocking: Usage, Customization, Workflow
description.]]
* [[http://orgmode.org/manual/Clocking-work-time.html#Clocking-work-time][The
orgmode Clocking Section]]
* [[http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/index.php#sec-3.3][Clock
related Links on Worg]]

etc.

OTOH, this seems a bit redundant, given the fact that there is already
org-tutorials on worg. It might be more convenient to only have a link
to the proper sections on worg ...

 Thanks for reading,

Thanks for writing!

Memnon Anon



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Basic orgmode tutorial

2010-03-23 Thread Richard Riley
Memnon Anon gegendosenflei...@googlemail.com writes:

 Hi,
 Alexander Poslavsky alexander.poslav...@gmail.com writes:

 attached is an updated version of the file, added agenda and some lines on 
 gtd and exporting.

 I just read it and you did a great job so far; I will have a closer look
 later again, sadly I am very busy right now :(.

 Just one suggestion: I think it would be nice to have a Further
 Reading Subsection at the end of each Section, containing links to the 
 org manual pages, tutorials on this topic, FAQ Entries, screencasts,
 whatever.



Just an idle thought :-

Wouldn't it be great to have tutorial for org-mode  in org-mode.

e.g lesson one is how to complete a TODO - ie complete the tutorial
element which describes how to complete a task 

etc.

Would be pretty neat.



___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Basic orgmode tutorial

2010-03-23 Thread Alexander Poslavsky

On Mar 23, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Memnon Anon wrote:

 Hi,
 Alexander Poslavsky alexander.poslav...@gmail.com writes:
 
 attached is an updated version of the file, added agenda and some lines on 
 gtd and exporting.
 
 I just read it and you did a great job so far; I will have a closer look
 later again, sadly I am very busy right now :(.
 
 Just one suggestion: I think it would be nice to have a Further
 Reading Subsection at the end of each Section, containing links to the 
 org manual pages, tutorials on this topic, FAQ Entries, screencasts,
 whatever.
 
 Tutorials are an excellent starting point, but they also great to look
 up what you recently learned and are tinkering with. Lets say I read the
 tutorial and tried the Clocking. Then, suddenly, I realize I am not
 sure how I can really integrate this feature into a workflow. First
 thing I would do is return to my tutorial and reread the section.
 If the limited information there [its a tutorial, it is by definition
 limited], I would really appreciate a Further Reading Section, linking
 e.g. to Bernt Hansens excellent infos on his clock usage, like:
 
 * [[http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#Clocking][Bernt Hansens extensive
   description Time Clocking: Usage, Customization, Workflow
   description.]]
 * [[http://orgmode.org/manual/Clocking-work-time.html#Clocking-work-time][The
   orgmode Clocking Section]]
 * [[http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/index.php#sec-3.3][Clock
   related Links on Worg]]
 
 etc.
 
 OTOH, this seems a bit redundant, given the fact that there is already
 org-tutorials on worg. It might be more convenient to only have a link
 to the proper sections on worg …
snip
thanks, just added a bunch of links for further reading. Even if redundant, it 
still might ease the pain of learning.

,alex

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode