[Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten,

Thanks a lot to you (and all others who made this happen) for this beautiful
new version!!

Carsten Dominik wrote:
 Lists handling
 ===

 Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a sublist,
 some text and then another sublist while still in the same top-level list
 item, like in the following situation:


   - Some list
 + A first sublist
 + of two elements

 A text belonging to the top-level list

 + Then another sublist
 + and a second element in it
   - End of main list

Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org Babel) from an
old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore the same way:

--8---cut here---start-8---
* How to view the results

- =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a code block.

- =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code block (first,
  you need to add =:session= to it).

  Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input variable
  pre-loaded.

  =C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant of =C-c
  C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to the
  session buffer, it splits the window between:

  + the session buffer, and
  + a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question.

  This can be convenient for using language major mode for interacting with
  the session buffer.
--8---cut here---end---8---

The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element of the first
list.

Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents, does anyone
know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to write things
down?  Or, does some possibility still exist to support this seamlessly?


 Make footnotes work correctly in message-mode
 ==
 The footnotes code now searches for the message delimiter -- in order to
 place footnotes before the signature. Thanks to Tassilo Horn for this patch.

Just a detail: the delimiter is --  (space after the dashes).

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Carsten Dominik




Make footnotes work correctly in message-mode
==
The footnotes code now searches for the message delimiter -- in  
order to
place footnotes before the signature. Thanks to Tassilo Horn for  
this patch.


Just a detail: the delimiter is --  (space after the dashes).


Really?  Is that the official delimiter?  I never knew.

- Carsten




___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Carsten Dominik

Hi Sebastian,

On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:


Hi Carsten,

Thanks a lot to you (and all others who made this happen) for this  
beautiful

new version!!

Carsten Dominik wrote:

Lists handling
===

Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a  
sublist,
some text and then another sublist while still in the same top- 
level list

item, like in the following situation:


 - Some list
   + A first sublist
   + of two elements

   A text belonging to the top-level list

   + Then another sublist
   + and a second element in it
 - End of main list


Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org Babel)  
from an
old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore the  
same way:


--8---cut here---start-8---
* How to view the results

- =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a code  
block.


- =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code block  
(first,

 you need to add =:session= to it).

 Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input variable
 pre-loaded.

 =C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant  
of =C-c

 C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to the
 session buffer, it splits the window between:

 + the session buffer, and
 + a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question.

 This can be convenient for using language major mode for  
interacting with

 the session buffer.
--8---cut here---end---8---

The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element of  
the first

list.

Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents, does  
anyone
know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to  
write things
down?  Or, does some possibility still exist to support this  
seamlessly?


It is not that this would be bad style.  In fact I do miss this kind  
of structure as well, and accepting loosing it was the biggest  
argument against Nicolas' change.


However, the trade was for much greater stability and consistency of  
plain lists, Nicolas has done some great work here.  Another issue was  
that the LaTeX exporter never had any support for these structures, so  
that was inconsistent for a long time.


- Carsten






Make footnotes work correctly in message-mode
==
The footnotes code now searches for the message delimiter -- in  
order to
place footnotes before the signature. Thanks to Tassilo Horn for  
this patch.


Just a detail: the delimiter is --  (space after the dashes).

Best regards,
 Seb

--
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


- Carsten




___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Sébastien Vauban
Hi Carsten,

Carsten Dominik wrote:
 On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
 Carsten Dominik wrote:
 Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a sublist,
 some text and then another sublist while still in the same top- level list
 item, like in the following situation:

  - Some list
+ A first sublist
+ of two elements

A text belonging to the top-level list

+ Then another sublist
+ and a second element in it
  - End of main list

 Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org Babel) from
 an old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore the same
 way:

 --8---cut here---start-8---
 * How to view the results

 - =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a code block.

 - =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code block (first,
  you need to add =:session= to it).

  Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input variable
  pre-loaded.

  =C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant of =C-c
  C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to the
  session buffer, it splits the window between:

  + the session buffer, and
  + a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question.

  This can be convenient for using language major mode for interacting with
  the session buffer.
 --8---cut here---end---8---

 The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element of the
 first list.

 Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents, does anyone
 know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to write
 things down? Or, does some possibility still exist to support this
 seamlessly?

 It is not that this would be bad style. In fact I do miss this kind of
 structure as well, and accepting loosing it was the biggest argument against
 Nicolas' change.

Does that mean that we must admit this will stay like that forever, or will
one try to look and see if it's possible to make that extension?


 However, the trade was for much greater stability and consistency of plain
 lists, Nicolas has done some great work here. Another issue was that the
 LaTeX exporter never had any support for these structures, so that was
 inconsistent for a long time.

I know that Bastien told he would fix it when he would have time. So, that did
not seem to be an impossible wish.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Oct 29, 2010, at 1:36 PM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:


Hi Carsten,

Carsten Dominik wrote:

On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:

Carsten Dominik wrote:
Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a  
sublist,
some text and then another sublist while still in the same top-  
level list

item, like in the following situation:

- Some list
  + A first sublist
  + of two elements

  A text belonging to the top-level list

  + Then another sublist
  + and a second element in it
- End of main list


Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org  
Babel) from
an old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore  
the same

way:

--8---cut here---start-8---
* How to view the results

- =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a  
code block.


- =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code  
block (first,

you need to add =:session= to it).

Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input  
variable

pre-loaded.

=C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant  
of =C-c
C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to  
the

session buffer, it splits the window between:

+ the session buffer, and
+ a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question.

This can be convenient for using language major mode for  
interacting with

the session buffer.
--8---cut here---end---8---

The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element  
of the

first list.

Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents,  
does anyone
know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to  
write

things down? Or, does some possibility still exist to support this
seamlessly?


It is not that this would be bad style. In fact I do miss this kind  
of
structure as well, and accepting loosing it was the biggest  
argument against

Nicolas' change.


Does that mean that we must admit this will stay like that forever,  
or will

one try to look and see if it's possible to make that extension?


I am not against it if it can be done in a clean way that is in  
keeping with the structure and philosophy Nicolas has implemented.


I think this will mean that we would not use just indentation to  
define this,

but some explicit piece of syntax.

Patches and discussions about this will always be welcome, no need to  
close any door for good.






However, the trade was for much greater stability and consistency  
of plain
lists, Nicolas has done some great work here. Another issue was  
that the
LaTeX exporter never had any support for these structures, so that  
was

inconsistent for a long time.


I know that Bastien told he would fix it when he would have time.  
So, that did

not seem to be an impossible wish.


Trust me, it is not something I can do in a day or two, or I would  
have done it a long time ago.  I don't know why Bastien has never done  
it.  bastien, did you ever try?


- Carsten


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:

 Make footnotes work correctly in message-mode
 ==
 The footnotes code now searches for the message delimiter -- in
 order to
 place footnotes before the signature. Thanks to Tassilo Horn for
 this patch.

 Just a detail: the delimiter is --  (space after the dashes).

 Really?  Is that the official delimiter?  I never knew.

I suppose so, it's mentioned in the RFC[1]

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3676#section-4.3
-- 
Miłego dnia,
Łukasz Stelmach


___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Eric S Fraga
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:



 Make footnotes work correctly in message-mode
 ==
 The footnotes code now searches for the message delimiter -- in
 order to
 place footnotes before the signature. Thanks to Tassilo Horn for
 this patch.

 Just a detail: the delimiter is --  (space after the dashes).

 Really?  Is that the official delimiter?  I never knew.

 - Carsten

More precisely: ^-- $ in a regex form.  That is, a single line
consisting of exactly two dashes and one space indicates the start of
the signature.  Nothing else does.

-- 
Eric S Fraga
GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29  570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Jambunathan K
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:

 Dear all,

 I have release version 7.02 or Org-mode.  Thanks to all who
 have contributed!

 Enjoy

 - Carsten


 Changes in version 7.02


1. Would be nice if Babel specific changes are in a separate headline.
2. Please mention support for Speed Keys on Babel header lines.

The entry titled 'Support for user-extensible speed commands' could
either be subsumed in to (2) or kept separately. I would personally
prefer the later option.

Jambunathan K.

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Bastien
Łukasz Stelmach lukasz.stelm...@iem.pw.edu.pl writes:

 Thanks to Lukasz Setmann for a patch to this effect.
 ^^
 Who's that guy? ;-)

Fixed :)  

You even obtained a proper Ł in your first name.

-- 
 Bastien

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Eric Schulte
Hi,

Sorry about this oversight, I must have missed it when trolling through
the git logs.  I've now added an entry on the Babel speed commands.

Thanks -- Eric

Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:

 Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:

 Dear all,

 I have release version 7.02 or Org-mode.  Thanks to all who
 have contributed!

 Enjoy

 - Carsten


 Changes in version 7.02


 1. Would be nice if Babel specific changes are in a separate headline.
 2. Please mention support for Speed Keys on Babel header lines.

 The entry titled 'Support for user-extensible speed commands' could
 either be subsumed in to (2) or kept separately. I would personally
 prefer the later option.

 Jambunathan K.

 ___
 Emacs-orgmode mailing list
 Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
 Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


[Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Carsten Dominik


On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Jambunathan K wrote:


Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:


Dear all,

I have release version 7.02 or Org-mode.  Thanks to all who
have contributed!

Enjoy

- Carsten


Changes in version 7.02



1. Would be nice if Babel specific changes are in a separate headline.
2. Please mention support for Speed Keys on Babel header lines.

The entry titled 'Support for user-extensible speed commands' could
either be subsumed in to (2) or kept separately. I would personally
prefer the later option.


Please send me a patch!

- Carsten

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode


Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release 7.02

2010-10-29 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello,

 Sébastien Vauban writes:

 Does that mean that we must admit this will stay like that forever,
 or will one try to look and see if it's possible to make that
 extension?

Nobody said it was impossible. For now, it is unavailable because not
satisfying enough.

The main difficulty isn't coming from exporters or even to make Org
recognize such constructs. It is, as I already said, about user
interface. How do you create such lists? How does Org is supposed to
react when you ask to indent such lists? I asked others practical
questions about it in a previous thread.

Did you read them? Do you have some answers? What do you think about
Carsten's idea to use - @?

Regards,

-- Nicolas

___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode