RE: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-12 Thread Cook, Malcolm
Agreed, +1, yes yes, much appreciated, I look forward to your summaries, I 
always learn something useful….
~Malcolm


Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-12 Thread Bill Burdick
Just saw  this -- this is a great service to the community, thanks for
doing it!


-- Bill


On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 12:36 PM Timothy  wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> As we arrive at the end of May, I'm about to publish the 3rd issue of
> /This Month in Org/. I thought I'd share the current draft with the list
> the day before I publish to so that those of you who are interested have
> the chance to point out any errors, let me know if there's anything I
> haven't covered that you'd like to see, along with any other feedback
> you may have.
>
> For the next day, you can find the draft at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/DRAFT-2021-05-31.html
> and then once published it will live at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-05-31.html
>
> All the best,
>
> Timothy.
>
> p.s. Based on the response to this, I may or may not keep on doing this.
> If you would (or wouldn't) like to see me repeat this, let me know :)
>
>


Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-12 Thread Jeremie Juste
Hello Jack


On Thursday, 10 Jun 2021 at 05:56, Jack Kamm wrote:
> Hi Jeremie,
>
> Jeremie Juste  writes:
>
>> Just a precision async process is already available in R. Thanks again
>> to Jack Kamm for this input.
>
> I believe async evaluation in R still requires my external package:
Yes you are right. I used it so much that I wrongly thought is was part
of ob-R already.

@Timothy my apologies you were right all the way, Async is not part of
ob-R but will be soon.

>
> https://github.com/jackkamm/ob-session-async
>
> Are you sure you don't have that package enabled?
>
> I'm currently blocked on porting the R implementation here, while
> awaiting paperwork at my current job (I am making headway, but
> slowly).
Glad to hear that it is moving in the right direction. 

>
> In the meantime, feel free to go ahead and port it, if you like. It
> should be a very simple copy-paste, changing 1 or 2 variable names. All
> that code was written while at my previous job, which had signed the
> copyright disclaimer, so is safe to copy.
Thanks, I'll will keep you posted.

>
> You can also refer to my port of async sessions to ob-python, which I
> wrote before switching jobs:
>
> https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/53fd5b774e23406ed351bdb166ab35edd0c44892
Thanks this is a valuable info, I'll keep that in mind

>
> https://orgmode.org/list/87h7qi2l2m@gmail.com/

Best regards,
Jeremie Juste



Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-10 Thread Jack Kamm
Hi Jeremie,

Jeremie Juste  writes:

> Just a precision async process is already available in R. Thanks again
> to Jack Kamm for this input.

I believe async evaluation in R still requires my external package:

https://github.com/jackkamm/ob-session-async

Are you sure you don't have that package enabled?

I'm currently blocked on porting the R implementation here, while
awaiting paperwork at my current job (I am making headway, but slowly).

In the meantime, feel free to go ahead and port it, if you like. It
should be a very simple copy-paste, changing 1 or 2 variable names. All
that code was written while at my previous job, which had signed the
copyright disclaimer, so is safe to copy.

You can also refer to my port of async sessions to ob-python, which I
wrote before switching jobs:

https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/53fd5b774e23406ed351bdb166ab35edd0c44892

https://orgmode.org/list/87h7qi2l2m@gmail.com/

Best,
Jack



Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-10 Thread Jeremie Juste


Hello Timothy,

On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 01:33, Timothy wrote:

Many thanks for these highlights. I value them very much as even though
I check this list almost everyday, I missed the thread on 'Font lock for inline 
export snippets'.

Just a precision async process is already available in R. Thanks again
to Jack Kamm for this input.


#+BEGIN_SRC R :session *R* :async yes :eval yes
Sys.sleep(5)
print("I needed 5 sec to run but I didn't freeze emacs")
#+end_src

#+RESULTS:
: [1] "I needed 5 sec to run but I didn't freeze emacs"


Best regards,
Jeremie

> Hi Everyone,
>
> As we arrive at the end of May, I'm about to publish the 3rd issue of
> /This Month in Org/. I thought I'd share the current draft with the list
> the day before I publish to so that those of you who are interested have
> the chance to point out any errors, let me know if there's anything I
> haven't covered that you'd like to see, along with any other feedback
> you may have.
>
> For the next day, you can find the draft at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/DRAFT-2021-05-31.html
> and then once published it will live at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-05-31.html
>
> All the best,
>
> Timothy.
>
> p.s. Based on the response to this, I may or may not keep on doing this.
> If you would (or wouldn't) like to see me repeat this, let me know :)
>

-- 
Jeremie Juste



Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-02 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Wednesday,  2 Jun 2021 at 00:38, Timothy wrote:
> Eric S Fraga  writes:
>> I would find this quite useful as I hate typing : when entering diary
>> entries.  Where does this support exist?
>
> This is for date entry using `org-time-stamp' at the very least. I'm not
> sure if anything else is affected.

Ah, yes, it is there for inserting time stamps directly.  Thank you.  In
any case, it would be good if diary functions would also support this.

-- 
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-549-ga0a87d



Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-01 Thread Timothy


Eric S Fraga  writes:

> Thank you for this.  Your summaries are very useful.  I find out things
> that I somehow missed despite being on the mailing list.

Great to hear!

> However, there is one item that not only did I miss but I don't see it
> in org itself:
>
> * Add support for HHhMM date formats (e.g. 13h20) Gustavo Barros
>
> I would find this quite useful as I hate typing : when entering diary
> entries.  Where does this support exist?

This is for date entry using `org-time-stamp' at the very least. I'm not
sure if anything else is affected.

> Thank you,
> eric

Hope that helps,

Timothy



Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-06-01 Thread Eric S Fraga
Timothy,

thank you for this.  Your summaries are very useful.  I find out things
that I somehow missed despite being on the mailing list.

However, there is one item that not only did I miss but I don't see it
in org itself:

* Add support for HHhMM date formats (e.g. 13h20) Gustavo Barros

I would find this quite useful as I hate typing : when entering diary
entries.  Where does this support exist?

Thank you,
eric

-- 
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-549-ga0a87d



Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-05-31 Thread John Corless
Timothy,

Thanks for your work on this.  I think it is an excellent resource.

Best regards,

John


On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 12:36 PM Timothy  wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> As we arrive at the end of May, I'm about to publish the 3rd issue of
> /This Month in Org/. I thought I'd share the current draft with the list
> the day before I publish to so that those of you who are interested have
> the chance to point out any errors, let me know if there's anything I
> haven't covered that you'd like to see, along with any other feedback
> you may have.
>
> For the next day, you can find the draft at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/DRAFT-2021-05-31.html
> and then once published it will live at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-05-31.html
>
> All the best,
>
> Timothy.
>
> p.s. Based on the response to this, I may or may not keep on doing this.
> If you would (or wouldn't) like to see me repeat this, let me know :)
>
>


Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-05-30 Thread tomas
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 01:33:08AM +0800, Timothy wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> As we arrive at the end of May, I'm about to publish the 3rd issue of
> /This Month in Org/ [...]

This is *very* nice :-)

Thanks so much.

Cheers
 - t


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: TMIO Pre-release, request for feedback

2021-05-30 Thread Juan Manuel MacĂ­as
Hi Timothy,

Timothy writes:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> As we arrive at the end of May, I'm about to publish the 3rd issue of
> /This Month in Org/. I thought I'd share the current draft with the list
> the day before I publish to so that those of you who are interested have
> the chance to point out any errors, let me know if there's anything I
> haven't covered that you'd like to see, along with any other feedback
> you may have.
>
> For the next day, you can find the draft at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/DRAFT-2021-05-31.html
> and then once published it will live at:
> https://blog.tecosaur.com/tmio/2021-05-31.html

Thank you very much for your excellent work, and for all the effort and
time you put in it. I think your /This Month in Org/ conveys, above all,
something very valuable that all Org users share: an immense and
uncompromising enthusiasm for Org and Emacs :-D

I like the design of the site: very clear and readable.

Best regards,

Juan Manuel