Re: [O] Org-babel: can evaluation confirmation be disabled (e.g., set to always yes)?
Torsten Anders torsten.and...@beds.ac.uk wrote: Dear Babel developers, As you know, whenever I hit C-c C-c in a code block, I get the following question. Evaluate this LANGUAGE code block on your system? (y or n) In the case of nested calls (using noweb) there can even be many queries like that before some code is actually executed. Can this be disabled by setting it to yes by default? I don't do any coding in my blocks that could in any ways adversely affect my system... I could not find anything related in the documentation, apologies if I missed it. Best, Torsten It is documented in the Org manual, sec. 14.5, Evaluating code blocks, footnote 1, which points you to sec. 15.4, Code evaluation and security issues. Nick
Re: [O] Org-babel: can evaluation confirmation be disabled (e.g., set to always yes)?
It's under Miscellaneous in the manual. See the description of org-confirm-babel-evaluate at http://orgmode.org/manual/Code-evaluation-security.html#Code-evaluation-security Best, Ista On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Torsten Anders torsten.and...@beds.ac.uk wrote: Dear Babel developers, As you know, whenever I hit C-c C-c in a code block, I get the following question. Evaluate this LANGUAGE code block on your system? (y or n) In the case of nested calls (using noweb) there can even be many queries like that before some code is actually executed. Can this be disabled by setting it to yes by default? I don't do any coding in my blocks that could in any ways adversely affect my system... I could not find anything related in the documentation, apologies if I missed it. Best, Torsten -- Ista Zahn Graduate student University of Rochester Department of Clinical and Social Psychology http://yourpsyche.org
Re: [O] Org-babel: can evaluation confirmation be disabled (e.g., set to always yes)?
Dear Nick, It is documented in the Org manual, sec. 14.5, Evaluating code blocks, footnote 1, which points you to sec. 15.4, Code evaluation and security issues. Thanks for your help (and apologies for missing this footnote). Best, Torsten
