Re: [O] Purpose of mk/pw?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Tim Landscheidt  writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou  wrote:
>
>>> mk/pw seems to have not been touched in a long time, and
>>> whatever it did, it does not seem to do it nowaways:
>
>> [...]
>
>>> Is it still relevant?
>
>> No it isn't.
>
>> […]
>
> John confirmed that by private mail as well, so the attached
> patch will remove it.

Applied. Thank you.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738

Re: [O] Purpose of mk/pw?

[Tim Landscheidt]

Nicolas Goaziou  wrote:

>> mk/pw seems to have not been touched in a long time, and
>> whatever it did, it does not seem to do it nowaways:

> [...]

>> Is it still relevant?

> No it isn't.

> […]

John confirmed that by private mail as well, so the attached
patch will remove it.

Tim
>From 7214e34e3104399035c523eaa28b33ad4498f3b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Landscheidt 
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:12:16 +
Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete mk/pw

* mk/pw: Remove.
---
 mk/pw | 664 --
 1 file changed, 664 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 mk/pw

diff --git a/mk/pw b/mk/pw
deleted file mode 100755
index 13df6ea5b..0
-- 
2.13.6

Re: [O] Purpose of mk/pw?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Tim Landscheidt  writes:

> mk/pw seems to have not been touched in a long time, and
> whatever it did, it does not seem to do it nowaways:

[...]

> Is it still relevant?

No it isn't.

> If it was some kind of patch queue,
> is that aspect now sufficiently handled by
> https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/pulls?

I don't think there is any plan to use that either. For the current rate
of patches, this ML is sufficient IMO.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou