Re: [Orgmode] multiple agenda buffers
Hi Suvayu, Suvayu Ali writes: > This is exactly how I was expecting things to work when I proposed the > idea! Wonderful work, lots and lots of thank yous. :) Well, this command turned out to be trivial -- so thanks to the design of org-agenda.el ;) -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] multiple agenda buffers
Hi Bastien, On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:20:28 +0100 Bastien wrote: > Hi all, > > Suvayu Ali writes: > > > However I was wondering, block agenda commands might work at least > > for doing multiple searches. But I don't think there is any > > interactive interface to it. > > inspired by this conversation, I have add a new agenda command: > > M-x org-agenda-append-agenda RET > > It is bound to `A' in the agenda buffer and lets you append any > agenda to the currently displayed one, thus providing some kind > of interactive interface to build block agendas from simple ones. > > I think it's a neat addition -- especially useful when you want > to compare to _small_ list of items. > > Let me know what you think - and thanks Suvayu for the idea! > This is exactly how I was expecting things to work when I proposed the idea! Wonderful work, lots and lots of thank yous. :) -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] multiple agenda buffers
Hi all, Suvayu Ali writes: > However I was wondering, block agenda commands might work at least for > doing multiple searches. But I don't think there is any interactive > interface to it. inspired by this conversation, I have add a new agenda command: M-x org-agenda-append-agenda RET It is bound to `A' in the agenda buffer and lets you append any agenda to the currently displayed one, thus providing some kind of interactive interface to build block agendas from simple ones. I think it's a neat addition -- especially useful when you want to compare to _small_ list of items. Let me know what you think - and thanks Suvayu for the idea! -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] multiple agenda buffers
Hi Bastien, On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:20:08 +0100 Bastien wrote: > I reckon your use-case makes sense, but I'm not sure how useful it > would be in general. > > It would be a bit like being able to open several email inboxes at the > same time, for the sake of comparing informations from various > folders. > > Email inboxes and agenda views are made to be _processed_: having more > than one open at the same time might lead to the bad habit of fiddling > with buffers instead of processing agenda items... > > Not a strong opinion, just a thought, This is indeed very true. I do fall prey to that sometimes. However I was wondering, block agenda commands might work at least for doing multiple searches. But I don't think there is any interactive interface to it. If we could have some syntax for specifying prompts for custom agenda commands (something like capture templates) then it might be possible. Is that a feasible request? -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] multiple agenda buffers
Hi Suvayu, suvayu ali writes: > I was wondering whether it was possible to have multiple agenda buffers > at the same time. My use case is when I want to look for two differnt > but related things, or when I want to search while having my daily (or > weekly) agenda visible. I found references in the archives[fn:1] stating > that it was not possible at the time. Has the situation changed? No, the situation has not changed to this respect. I reckon your use-case makes sense, but I'm not sure how useful it would be in general. It would be a bit like being able to open several email inboxes at the same time, for the sake of comparing informations from various folders. Email inboxes and agenda views are made to be _processed_: having more than one open at the same time might lead to the bad habit of fiddling with buffers instead of processing agenda items... Not a strong opinion, just a thought, -- Bastien ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Multiple agenda buffers
Hi, On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Desmond Rivet wrote: Hi all, A brief search through the mailing list did not reveal anything obvious... Is it possible to have multiple Org Agenda buffers open say, if you want different search results side by side? I know you can put different search results in the *same* agenda buffer, but that wasn't quite what I had in mind (though I will fall back on this if two agenda buffers is unfeasible) For various technical reasons such as markers that are removed when a new agenda buffer is produced and many other details, several agenda buffers are not supported currently. You could consider making a block agenda with several parts, and then use side-by-side windows to look at different places in that same buffer. Hope this helps! - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Multiple agenda buffers
Desmond Rivet wrote: > Is it possible to have multiple Org Agenda buffers open say, if you want > different search results side by side? For the use case of simply viewing two search results side by side, renaming an agenda buffer seems to work: - open the agenda view: C-c a a - M-x rename-buffer RET new.name RET - open a second agenda view: C-c a t The problem with this approach is that any agenda command you use in the renamed agenda buffer will be confused and probably not work. A solution to this might be to make some variables (including org-agenda-buffer-name and org-agenda-type) buffer-local to this renamed buffer, but I have no idea if this could work or what other variables would have to be included. HTH, Jan ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode