Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+]
Trying to answer waterloo's question about strike-through, I tried LaTeX-exporting the following: --8<---cut here---start->8--- * Emphasis and monospace - *bold* - /italic/ - _underlined_ - =code= - ~verbatim~ - +strike-through+ --8<---cut here---end--->8--- but the resulting LaTeX file has the wrong markup for strike-through: , | ... | \begin{itemize} | \item \textbf{bold} | \item \emph{italic} | \item \underline{underlined} | \item \texttt{code} | \item \texttt{verbatim} | \item \texttt{strike-through} | \end{itemize} | ... ` The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike, is obtained using the ulem package: \usepackage{ulem} ... \sout{strike-through} ... The change for \sout is trivial (just change org-export-latex-emphasis-alist), but adding the ulem package conditionally is perhaps more difficult. Maybe it should be added unconditionally? AFAIK, there is no mechanism for including \usepackages conditionally, is there? Thanks, Nick ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+]
Nick Dokos wrote: > ... > The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ: > > http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike, > > is obtained using the ulem package: > > > \usepackage{ulem} > > ... > \sout{strike-through} > ... > > ...or as the FAQ clearly states but I omitted to mention: \usepackage{soul} ... \st{strike-through} ... I don't know which of the two packages is "better", but as far as the LaTeX exporter is concerned, they both present the same problem. Nick ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+]
Hi Nick and waterloo, I have now added the ulem package to support strike-through emphasis. Thanks for looking this up in the TeX docs. - Carsten On Aug 17, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: Nick Dokos wrote: ... The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike, is obtained using the ulem package: \usepackage{ulem} ... \sout{strike-through} ... ...or as the FAQ clearly states but I omitted to mention: \usepackage{soul} ... \st{strike-through} ... I don't know which of the two packages is "better", but as far as the LaTeX exporter is concerned, they both present the same problem. Nick ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode