Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+]
Trying to answer waterloo's question about strike-through, I tried
LaTeX-exporting the following:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
* Emphasis and monospace
- *bold*
- /italic/
- _underlined_
- =code=
- ~verbatim~
- +strike-through+
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
but the resulting LaTeX file has the wrong markup for strike-through:
,
| ...
| \begin{itemize}
| \item \textbf{bold}
| \item \emph{italic}
| \item \underline{underlined}
| \item \texttt{code}
| \item \texttt{verbatim}
| \item \texttt{strike-through}
| \end{itemize}
| ...
`
The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike,
is obtained using the ulem package:
\usepackage{ulem}
...
\sout{strike-through}
...
The change for \sout is trivial (just change
org-export-latex-emphasis-alist), but adding the ulem package
conditionally is perhaps more difficult. Maybe it should be
added unconditionally? AFAIK, there is no mechanism for including
\usepackages conditionally, is there?
Thanks,
Nick
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+]
Nick Dokos wrote:
> ...
> The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ:
>
> http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike,
>
> is obtained using the ulem package:
>
>
> \usepackage{ulem}
>
> ...
> \sout{strike-through}
> ...
>
>
...or as the FAQ clearly states but I omitted to mention:
\usepackage{soul}
...
\st{strike-through}
...
I don't know which of the two packages is "better", but as far
as the LaTeX exporter is concerned, they both present the same
problem.
Nick
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: Small bug in the LaTeX exporter? [was: Re: [Orgmode] I_can_not_understand_ +strike-through+]
Hi Nick and waterloo,
I have now added the ulem package to support strike-through emphasis.
Thanks for looking this up in the TeX docs.
- Carsten
On Aug 17, 2009, at 3:55 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Nick Dokos wrote:
...
The correct markup, according to the TeX FAQ:
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=overstrike,
is obtained using the ulem package:
\usepackage{ulem}
...
\sout{strike-through}
...
...or as the FAQ clearly states but I omitted to mention:
\usepackage{soul}
...
\st{strike-through}
...
I don't know which of the two packages is "better", but as far
as the LaTeX exporter is concerned, they both present the same
problem.
Nick
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
