Re: Segmentation fault using font '7x13bold'

2006-05-19 Thread Nick Roberts
 > >  > Here's a simple test case that crashes reliably for me:
 > >  > 
 > >  > $ emacs -Q -eval '(let ((f (make-temp-file "bang"))) (set-frame-font
 > >  > "9x15") (with-temp-file f (insert 27 44 98 105 27 40 66))
 > >  > (find-alternate-file f))'
 > >  > Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault
 > > 
 > > It doesn't crash for me.
 > 
 > It could be something specific with the fonts that are actually
 > installed.  Can you both tell what font gets used when you specify the
 > 9x15 font?  What is the full spec of the font Emacs uses?

This is what I get if I do C-u C-x = on the character that's displayed in the
buffer:

  character: ? (3945, #o7551, #xf69, U+00E9)
charset: latin-iso8859-15
 (Right-Hand Part of Latin Alphabet 9 (ISO/IEC 8859-15): 
ISO-IR-203.)
 code point: #x69
 syntax: w  which means: word
   category: l:Latin
buffer code: #x8E #xE9
  file code: ESC #x2C #x62 #x69 (encoded by coding system iso-2022-7bit)
display: by this font (glyph code)
 -Misc-Fixed-Medium-R-Normal--15-140-75-75-C-90-ISO8859-15 (#xE9)

 > Also, what does "M-x report-emacs-bug RET" put in the buffer as the
 > values of important variables, for both of you?

Well, as it works for me, I guess Chris's values are of more interest, but
here they are anyway:

In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.12 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
 of 2006-05-15 on kahikatea.snap.net.nz
X server distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.7000
configured using `configure 'CFLAGS=-g3''

Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: nil
  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: nil
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil
  value of $LC_TIME: nil
  value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
  locale-coding-system: utf-8
  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t

Major mode: Fundamental

Minor modes in effect:
  tooltip-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  tool-bar-mode: t
  mouse-wheel-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  blink-cursor-mode: t
  unify-8859-on-encoding-mode: t
  utf-translate-cjk-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: identity

Recent input:
 
C-u 
C-x = 

 
 C-h c C-x = C-h k C-x =   
M-x r e p o r t SPC e m a c s SPC b u f  
g 

Recent messages:
For information about the GNU Project and its goals, type C-h C-p.
Loading descr-text...done
Loading composite...done
Loading wid-edit...done
Type C-x 1 to remove help window.  
Char: ? (3945, #o7551, #xf69, file ...) point=1 of 1 (0%) column=0
C-x = runs the command what-cursor-position
Loading emacsbug...
Loading regexp-opt...done
Loading emacsbug...done


-- 
Nick   http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Segmentation fault using font '7x13bold'

2006-05-19 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 10:47:33 +1200
> Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
> 
>  > Here's a simple test case that crashes reliably for me:
>  > 
>  > $ emacs -Q -eval '(let ((f (make-temp-file "bang"))) (set-frame-font
>  > "9x15") (with-temp-file f (insert 27 44 98 105 27 40 66))
>  > (find-alternate-file f))'
>  > Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault
> 
> It doesn't crash for me.

It could be something specific with the fonts that are actually
installed.  Can you both tell what font gets used when you specify the
9x15 font?  What is the full spec of the font Emacs uses?

Also, what does "M-x report-emacs-bug RET" put in the buffer as the
values of important variables, for both of you?


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Segmentation fault using font '7x13bold'

2006-05-19 Thread Nick Roberts
 > Here's a simple test case that crashes reliably for me:
 > 
 > $ emacs -Q -eval '(let ((f (make-temp-file "bang"))) (set-frame-font
 > "9x15") (with-temp-file f (insert 27 44 98 105 27 40 66))
 > (find-alternate-file f))'
 > Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault

It doesn't crash for me.

xbacktrace is a user-defined command in .gdbinit in the src directory.  You
need to start gdb in that directory (or 'source' it).

-- 
Nick   http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Segmentation fault using font '7x13bold'

2006-05-19 Thread Chris Moore

Here's a simple test case that crashes reliably for me:

$ emacs -Q -eval '(let ((f (make-temp-file "bang"))) (set-frame-font
"9x15") (with-temp-file f (insert 27 44 98 105 27 40 66))
(find-alternate-file f))'
Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault
$


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Segmentation fault using font '7x13bold'

2006-05-19 Thread Chris Moore

On 5/18/06, I wrote:

I just updated my Emacs source tree from CVS and rebuilt.  I visited
the Changelog file and paged down 4 times and Emacs crashed.


I've found what it was in the ChangeLog file which was causing the
crash - it doesn't like the accented characters in Jérôme Marant's
name.  Jérôme's name appears 4 times in the ChangeLog, but only the
first one causes the crash.

I pulled them out into 4 separate files using this command:

 grep Marant ~/programs/emacs/ChangeLog | awk '{print $2}' | split -l1

Then ran Emacs on each of them:

$ emacs xaa
Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault
$ emacs xab
$ emacs xac
$ emacs xad

using 'od' to see the contents of the files:

$ for i in xa?; do echo $i; od -tx1 $i; done
xaa
000 4a 1b 2c 62 69 1b 28 42 72 1b 2c 62 74 1b 28 42
020 6d 65 0a
023
xab
000 4a 1b 2c 41 69 1b 28 42 72 1b 2c 41 74 1b 28 42
020 6d 65 0a
023
xac
000 4a 1b 2c 41 69 1b 28 42 72 1b 2c 41 74 1b 28 42
020 6d 65 0a
023
xad
000 4a 65 72 6f 6d 65 0a
007
$

- note that both the 'e' and the 'o' take up 7 bytes:
J (4a) e (1b 2c 62 69 1b 28 42) r (72) o (1b 2c 62 74 1b 28 42) m (6d) e (65) 0a

This happens with a one-line .emacs file, such as:

$ cat ~/.emacs
(set-frame-font "9x15")
$

It doesn't happen if I comment that line out.

Chris.


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Re: How to use xft font in unicode-xft branch

2006-05-19 Thread Svetoslav Agafonkin
Jan Djärv wrote:

>Well, that should work, it works here. The -fn switch is currently the
only way to select >a font.
>
>   Jan D.

I think that the configure script does not contain the check for --with-xft
for some reason. After rebuilding it with autoconf and configuring and 
buiding emacs with it everything works.



Best regards,
Slavi Agafonkin
www.imperia.net





___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


emacs-unicode-2 fontset bug

2006-05-19 Thread Leon
Dear all,

After many trials, I think I found another bug of emacs-unicode-2
branch. I have the following settings in ~/.Xresources:

,[ ~/.Xresources ]
| Emacs.Fontset-0: -*-*-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-unicode,\
| ascii:-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1,\
| mule-unicode-2500-33ff:-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1,\
| mule-unicode-e000-:-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1,\
| mule-unicode-0100-24ff:-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
| Emacs.Font: fontset-unicode
`

In emacs-unicode-2, the font for ascii will be a font that matches 
"-*-*-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*" instead of
"-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1".

However, emacs 21.3 will correctly pick up the font matches
"-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1". 

Here is the output of describe-fontset in emacs 23 and 21.3:

Fontset: -*-*-medium-r-*-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-unicode
CHAR RANGE (CODE RANGE)
FONT NAME (REQUESTED and [OPENED])
C-@ .. ÿ (#x43 .. #xFF)
-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
Ā .. ㏿ (#x100 .. #x33FF)
-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
㐀 .. í¿¿ (#x3400 .. #xDFFF)
-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
 .. ￿ (#xE000 .. #x)
-gnu-unifont-medium-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
𐀀 .. ÿ (#x1 .. #x3F)
-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
default
-*-terminus-medium-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1

  --
C-@ .. DEL
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-2
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-3
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-4
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-9
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-10
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-13
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-14
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-15
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-viscii1.1-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
€ .. Ÿ (#x80 .. #x9F)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-gb2312.1980*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0208*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ksc5601.1987*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-2
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-3
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-4
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-5
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-6
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-7
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-big5*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0213.2000-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0213.2004-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0212*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
-gnu-unifont-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
-mutt-clearlyu-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
  .. ͯ (#xA0 .. #x36F)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-2
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-3
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-4
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-9
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-10
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-13
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-14
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-15
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-viscii1.1-1
Í° .. Ï¡ (#x370 .. #x3E1)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-7
Ϣ .. ϯ (#x3E2 .. #x3EF)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-gb2312.1980*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0208*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ksc5601.1987*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-2
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-3
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-4
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-5
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-6
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-7
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-big5*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0213.2000-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0213.2004-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0212*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
-gnu-unifont-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
-mutt-clearlyu-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
ϰ .. ϳ (#x3F0 .. #x3F3)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-7
Ï´ .. Ï¿ (#x3F4 .. #x3FF)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-gb2312.1980*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0208*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-ksc5601.1987*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-2
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-3
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-4
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-5
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-6
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-cns11643.1992-7
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-big5*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0213.2000-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0213.2004-1
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0212*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
-gnu-unifont-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
-mutt-clearlyu-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1
Ѐ .. ӿ (#x400 .. #x4FF)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-5
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-microsoft-cp1251
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-koi8-r
Ԁ .. ֏ (#x500 .. #x58F)
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-gb2312.1980*
-*-*-*-*-*

Re: gud-tooltip-mode: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments

2006-05-19 Thread Klaus Zeitler
> "Nick" == Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nick> 
Nick> Are you suggesting that I remove one so that the user isn't confused?

The problem is that both commands gdb and gdba print the same command in
the mini-buffer. I think a user would accept/understand that
"M-x gdb -> gdb --annotate=3" and "M-x gdb -> gdb --fullname"
behave differently. 
But now we have "M-x gdba -> gdb --annotate=3  core"
which works and "M-x gdb -> gdb --annotate=3  core"
that doesn't work.
Besides it's incompatible to older emacs versions and how the user would
call gdb in the shell.

>> BTW when I strip "source " from the filename by adding:
>> (if (and file (string-match "^source " file))
>> (setq file (replace-match "" t t file)))

Nick> You can use that as a local patch, if you like, but I don't want to
Nick> install such a hack.  What happens if the file is called  "source
Nick> filenames can have spaces.c" for example?

Very unlikely IMHO: no directory, white space in filename and "source" as
first part of the filename. I make that a defadvice for me.

Nick> Yes, the new interface is too inefficient at times.  Its an ongoing
Nick> process, but after the release (we're already two years nearer than
Nick> we were two years ago),

the real question is not how much nearer, but how far away :-(.

Nick> Well it's caused by the way Emacs uses the annotations.  Maybe it
Nick> could be done better, but its the best that I could do.  For such a
Nick> large image and core you're probably better off using "gdb
Nick> -fullname".

I guess I have to go back to --fullname and wait for GDB/MI.
Thanks for your detailed explanations.

Klaus

-- 
 --
|  Klaus Zeitler  Lucent Technologies  |
|  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
 --
---
Committee, n.:  A group of men who individually can do
nothing but as a group decide that nothing can be done.


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: gud-tooltip-mode: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments

2006-05-19 Thread Nick Roberts
 > Not sure what you mean with old behaviour. 

"gdb --fullname" which is what Emacs 21 (and earlier) uses, although the
fullname option was never visible in the command in the minibuffer.

 > Should I see a difference (as
 > long I don't set gdb-many-windows) between "M-x gdb" and "M-x gdba". Both
 > start by printing "gdb -annotate=3 " and then give me a gdb and
 > a source window.

The only difference is at startup.  'M-x gdba' presupposes "-annotate=3" and
is therefore ready for the "source" annotation that you see, whereas 'M-x gdb'
has to look at the markup output to work out whether gdb has been invoked
with "-annotate=3" or "-fullname" and gets caught out because "source" is
not usually the first annotation.  I'm sure the code could be further hacked
to deal with this case but I don't think the benefits justify the risks at
this point in the development cycle.

 > Isn't that confusing for the user when "gdb -annotate=3  core"
 > works in one case, but not the other?

M-x gdb works with "-fullname" and, in almost all cases, with "-annotate=3".
M-x gdba doesn't work with "-fullname", but in all cases with "-annotate=3".

Are you suggesting that I remove one so that the user isn't confused?

 > BTW when I strip "source " from the filename by adding:
 >   (if (and file (string-match "^source " file))
 >   (setq file (replace-match "" t t file)))
 > to the beginning gud-find-file, I can call gdb the usual way, i.e. with
 >  and core like I would do in the shell.

You can use that as a local patch, if you like, but I don't want to install
such a hack.  What happens if the file is called 
"source filenames can have spaces.c" for example?

 > I also have serious performance issues with the new gdb interface, e.g.
 >  gdb --fullname  core
 > and then "up" or "bt" in gdb takes a bit more than 20 seconds, whereas
 >  gdba -annotate=3  core
 > and then "up" or "bt" needs 2 and a half minutes.

Yes, the new interface is too inefficient at times.  Its an ongoing process,
but after the release (we're already two years nearer than we were two
years ago), things should get better when we move from annotations to GDB/MI.

 > This is almost certainly not an emacs problem, but seems to be caused by
 > the --annotate=3 option for gdb and of course our image size (125 MB and
 > 155 for the core file).

Well it's caused by the way Emacs uses the annotations.  Maybe it could be
done better, but its the best that I could do.  For such a large image and
core you're probably better off using "gdb -fullname".

 > Does "--annotate" even make sense when analyzing a core?

Well you can't step through the program or set breakpoints, but if you want to
see the stack, the locals, examine memory... certainly it does.

-- 
Nick   http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: gud-tooltip-mode: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments

2006-05-19 Thread Klaus Zeitler
> "Nick" == Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nick> 
Nick> I can suggest two workarounds:
Nick> 
Nick> 1) Specify the core file later:
Nick> 
Nick>Run gdb (like this): gdb --annotate=3 emacs
Nick> 
Nick>Then in the GUD buffer:
Nick> 
Nick>(gdb) core ~/emacs/src/core.3491
Nick> 
Nick> 2) Use 'M-x gdba', which should work how you want but won't give you
Nick>the old behaviour.

Yes both your 2 suggested methods work fine, but this doesn't look like
a consistent user interface.

Not sure what you mean with old behaviour. Should I see a difference (as
long I don't set gdb-many-windows) between "M-x gdb" and "M-x gdba". Both start
by printing "gdb -annotate=3 " and then give me a gdb and a source
window. 

Isn't that confusing for the user when "gdb -annotate=3  core"
works in one case, but not the other?

BTW when I strip "source " from the filename by adding:
  (if (and file (string-match "^source " file))
  (setq file (replace-match "" t t file)))
to the beginning gud-find-file, I can call gdb the usual way, i.e. with
 and core like I would do in the shell.

I also have serious performance issues with the new gdb interface, e.g.
 gdb --fullname  core
and then "up" or "bt" in gdb takes a bit more than 20 seconds, whereas
 gdba -annotate=3  core
and then "up" or "bt" needs 2 and a half minutes.
This is almost certainly not an emacs problem, but seems to be caused by
the --annotate=3 option for gdb and of course our image size (125 MB and
155 for the core file).

Does "--annotate" even make sense when analyzing a core?

Klaus


-- 
 --
|  Klaus Zeitler  Lucent Technologies  |
|  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
 --
---
The purpose of a windowing system is to put some amusing
fluff around your one almighty emacs window.


___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Fontification problem with fancy diary display

2006-05-19 Thread Glenn Morris

After getting some help on emacs-devel re multiline font-lock
patterns, I've checked in what I think is a fix for this.



___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug


Re: Click on fancy diary entry cause error if diary buffer was killed

2006-05-19 Thread Glenn Morris

I think this is fixed now.



___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug