Re: help with rcp problem?
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Tom Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW: to improve/ease support, perhaps it would be wise to implement something like ramp-submit-problem-report, and then upgrade the "Daniel Pittman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/31/00 9:35:25 PM M-x rcp-bug is your friend. Your documented friend, at that. doh! That hollow sound you hear is the resonant frequency of my skull after self-applied dope slap. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: help with rcp problem?
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: FWIW: to improve/ease support, perhaps it would be wise to implement something like ramp-submit-problem-report, and then upgrade the docs. What do you think about M-x tramp-bug RET? kai -- I like BOTH kinds of music.
Re: help with rcp problem?
Can you please (setq rcp-debug-buffer t), then try again and send the contents of the *debug rcp/foo* buffer? kai -- I like BOTH kinds of music.
Re: help with rcp problem?
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Tom Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/31/00 3:26:03 PM Can you please (setq rcp-debug-buffer t), then try again and send the contents of the *debug rcp/foo* buffer? FWIW: to improve/ease support, perhaps it would be wise to implement something like ramp-submit-problem-report, and then upgrade the docs. M-x rcp-bug is your friend. Your documented friend, at that. OTOH, it just sets up the mail. What we often need is the output of the debug run added to the mail. Hrm. I might try extending the documentation to cover that as well. Daniel -- Cease to be a drudge; seek to be an artist. -- Mary McLeod Bethune
