Re: [Emc-developers] Arm with PCIe -- mesa 6i25 (Peter C. Wallace)

2019-03-10 Thread Alec Ari via Emc-developers
Hello,

I would just use this:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git/log/?h=v4.14-rt

Alec


___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


Re: [Emc-developers] Arm with PCIe -- mesa 6i25 (Peter C. Wallace)

2019-03-08 Thread Alan Condit
I am not a big fan of IBM but I have to say that because they defined the PC 
bios and interrupt structure,
we all owe them a debt of gratitude for the continued degree of compatibility 
on the X86 machines.

I thought that there was already a stable rt-preempt kernel for 4.9 LTS and 
4.14 LTS and they were approaching stable on the 4.19 LTS rt-preempt kernel. 
However, I now realize that I was looking at the GitHub for rt-preempt generic.
It looks like there maybe something approaching stable for 4.9 LTS for Pine64. 
I am not sure of the relationship between the Pine64 and RockPro64. Pine64+ 
uses an Allwinner cpu, while the RockPro64 uses RK3399 which is Armv8.

I have built kernels in the past but am not an expert.

Alan

> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:56:46 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Peter C. Wallace" 
> To: EMC developers 
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Arm with PCIe -- mesa 6i25
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed
> 
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, Alan Condit wrote:
> 
>> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:34:39 -0800
>> From: Alan Condit 
>> Reply-To: EMC developers 
>> To: emc-developers 
>> Subject: [Emc-developers] Arm with PCIe -- mesa 6i25
>> 
>> I am looking at processors for my next controller. I saw yesterday that the 
>> RockPro64 has a PCIe 4x connector. It has a six core RK3399 - dual core A72 
>> - quad core Arm53. At the moment that doesn??t mean much to me.
> 
>> Anyway my question is would it be feasible to use the RockPro64 with a 6i25
>> board and if, yes, what would be required to use a 6i25 with that processor, 
>> i.e., is it just recompiling some ??C?? code or is there a bunch of assembly 
>> code that would have to be rewritten.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alan
> 
> 
> I suspect any changes (if needed) would be pretty minor, but a bigger 
> question 
> is can you get or build a reliable real time kernel for the RockPro. One 
> issue 
> with the ARM boards is that each one is different enough that its often an 
> 'adventure' to do things that are trivial on x86 because of per ARM board 
> idiosyncrasies.
> 
> Peter Wallace
> Mesa Electronics



___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers