RE: Terminal Blocks-Field Wiring Requirements

2000-06-09 Thread George Sparacino
Don,

I am aware of only one difference - Spacing.
It is considered that larger spacing between connections are needed for
field terminals to allow for, shall we say, potentially lesser controlled
installation circumstances   practices.  Factory wiring is usually
performed in accordance with a detailed wiring spec, in a controlled
environment where wires are stripped by machine (precision strip length) and
under goes QA inspection before shipping/installation of said (wired)
product. Due to this perceived precision, less space between terminal
connections is tolerated.

So, I would guess that for a terminal to be suitable for both, the
worse-case spacing (for field connection) would apply. This would also
satisfy the less severe (factory) criteria as well.

Good Luck,
George


-Original Message-
From: don_macart...@selinc.com [mailto:don_macart...@selinc.com]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 1:01 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Terminal Blocks-Field Wiring Requirements





What's the major differences between a terminal suitable for Factory Wiring
and
one suitable for both Factory Wiring and Field Wiring?



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Terminal Blocks-Field Wiring Requirements

2000-06-09 Thread Peter Tarver
Don -

There are additional details beyond the following, but in essence, there are
pull-out and wire retention tests that are done for field wiring purposes
that may or may not have been done for factory wiring purposes.  Field
wiring terminal blocks are subjected to the full range of tests normally
applied to wire connectors, except for wire binding screw type terminals,
which are separately evaluated.

IIRC, the ranges of wire sizes, conductor types, stranding, etc., are more
prescriptive for field wiring terminal blocks, than for factory wiring
terminal blocks.

Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Homologation Engineering
Nortel Networks
ptar...@nortelnetworks.com



From: don_macart...@selinc.com [mailto:don_macart...@selinc.com]

What's the major differences between a terminal suitable for Factory Wiring
and
one suitable for both Factory Wiring and Field Wiring?


RE: Terminal Blocks-Field Wiring Requirements

2000-06-09 Thread WOODS

In general, for field wiring terminals per EN60950:

*   must accept a range of conductors sizes normally expected to be used
*   use screws or nuts - no solder, crimping or special terminal on
conductor (unless a special power cord assembly is being replaced)
*   the screw or nut cannot directly bind against the conductor in order
to prevent damage from rotation
*   a spring or similar to guard against a loose connection
*   sufficient spacing to ensure that a loose wire strand will not short
to the next conductor

variances for internal wire terminals
*   acceptance of a single size wire is sufficient
*   almost any kind of reliable terminal and fastening means may be used
*   a secondary retention method is required if a loose wire would cause
a hazard

Richard Woods

--
From:  don_macart...@selinc.com [SMTP:don_macart...@selinc.com]
Sent:  Friday, June 09, 2000 1:01 PM
To:  emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:  Terminal Blocks-Field Wiring Requirements




What's the major differences between a terminal suitable for Factory
Wiring and
one suitable for both Factory Wiring and Field Wiring?



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: EMC Symposia CD of 1955 to 1995

2000-06-09 Thread ChasGrasso

The CD is available through the IEEE EMC Society for $40 dollars. 


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org