RE: Equipment Rental

2000-07-10 Thread Joe Finlayson

Bob,

I just sent mine back.  

Electro Rent
(770) 813-7081

I dealt with a gentleman by the name of Barry Kennedy and he shipped
the equipment out same day when I needed it.  The price was about $3,400.00
for the first month and broken down per day after that (same as monthly
price).

Good Luck,


Joe


Joe Finlayson
Manager, Compliance Engineering
Telica, Inc.
734 Foster Street, Bldg. G, Suite 100
Marlboro, MA 01752
Tel:(508) 480-0909 x212
Fax:(508) 480-0922
Email:  jfinlay...@telica.com



-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:28 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Equipment Rental





I need to rent the following equipment (preferrably in Darlington, U.K.):

* Antennas (EMC 30-1000 MHz)
* Spectrum Analyzer/EMI Receiver
* Pre-amp (30-1000 MHz)

Anyone know of a company?

Regards,
Bob Heller



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment-short life of li ght bulbs

2000-07-10 Thread Jim Eichner

In the spirit of trying the simplest thing first, I'll swap the light switch
out for a new one and see what happens.

Thanks for the tip,

Jim 

-Original Message-
From: Robert Macy [mailto:m...@california.com]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 12:49 PM
To: Jim Eichner; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment-short life of
light bulbs


The subject of short life of light bulbs appears often on the
alt.home.repairnewsgroup.

People come up with potential sources of problems like on the same branch
with the sump pump(or well pump), and long lines to the light bulb.
Their solutions were to put in those dimmer switches that cause the light
bulb to only get power at crossover gently turning them on.  And lower
the voltage, and ... but the consensus of the true source of short
lived light bulbs is either a poor neutral termination or the light switch
needs to be replaced!

I thought this a suspect answer until after this experience.  My bathroom
fixture took out light bulbs at the rate of about 1 per month, but that made
sense with the concentration of heat inside its housing and with the ON/OFF
cycling it is subjected to.

Then one day the switch jammed up and had to be replaced.  After that
replacement, the fixture will keep bulbs for almost a year.

Evidently, the bouncing contacts really do a trip on the cold filaments.
You might be right in that an NTC (Negative Temperature Coefficient
Resistor) will make up for it.  But it hardly seems worth the effort.  (Plus
if it's not the switch, a potential of a poor neutral could really mean a
major problem in your system. )

  - Robert -

   Robert A. Macy, PEm...@california.com
   408 286 3985  fx 408 297 9121
   AJM International Electronics Consultants
   619 North First St,   San Jose, CA  95112

-Original Message-
From: Jim Eichner jim.eich...@xantrex.com
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Monday, July 10, 2000 12:22 PM
Subject: RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



On the subject of NTC's, please allow me a slight detour from the
compliance
world to the real world.

I have a circuit in my house that blows light bulbs far more often than any
other.  I can't determine any reason for this - the voltage seems normal
and
there aren't any transient-producers on that same circuit (that I'm aware
of).  Long life and rural-duty bulbs make little or no difference.

Instead of figuring out the root cause, I'm considering resorting to trying
to deal with the symptom (blown bulbs) by putting an NTC in series with the
light fixture somewhere.  My thinking is that the mechanism that blows an
incandescent bulb filament is related to the high inrush current into the
cold (and therefore low R) filament, and the physical and thermal stresses
that that inrush causes.

Any comments on how likely this is to help, and whether or not I can safely
put an NTC in an junction box full of wires?  I'd check the NTC's
temperature under load (they get hot) and compare that the the temp. rating
of the wires in the box.  I'd also insulate the bare legs of the NTC and
try
to make sure it isn't touching anything else.  Anyone familiar with the
failure modes of these things?

Thanks,

Jim

-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 7:58 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



Dear All,

I have seen some design where NTCs are used to limit inrush currents in
motion controllers.

Q. Are NTCs safe and reliable as means to limit inrush currents?

Q. Are there safety considerations to consider for circuits employing NTCs?

Q. Are there any Approved (previously evaluated) NTC components out there?


I appreciate all of your comments and/or links regarding the use of NTCs in
electrical equipment.

Thanks

Peter Merguerian
Managing Director
Product Testing Division
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
Hacharoshet 26, POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel

Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019
e-mail: pmerguer...@itl.co.il
website: http://www.itl.co.il






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 

RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment

2000-07-10 Thread Jim Eichner

On the subject of NTC's, please allow me a slight detour from the compliance
world to the real world.

I have a circuit in my house that blows light bulbs far more often than any
other.  I can't determine any reason for this - the voltage seems normal and
there aren't any transient-producers on that same circuit (that I'm aware
of).  Long life and rural-duty bulbs make little or no difference.

Instead of figuring out the root cause, I'm considering resorting to trying
to deal with the symptom (blown bulbs) by putting an NTC in series with the
light fixture somewhere.  My thinking is that the mechanism that blows an
incandescent bulb filament is related to the high inrush current into the
cold (and therefore low R) filament, and the physical and thermal stresses
that that inrush causes.

Any comments on how likely this is to help, and whether or not I can safely
put an NTC in an junction box full of wires?  I'd check the NTC's
temperature under load (they get hot) and compare that the the temp. rating
of the wires in the box.  I'd also insulate the bare legs of the NTC and try
to make sure it isn't touching anything else.  Anyone familiar with the
failure modes of these things?

Thanks,

Jim 

-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 7:58 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



Dear All,

I have seen some design where NTCs are used to limit inrush currents in
motion controllers. 

Q. Are NTCs safe and reliable as means to limit inrush currents?

Q. Are there safety considerations to consider for circuits employing NTCs?

Q. Are there any Approved (previously evaluated) NTC components out there?


I appreciate all of your comments and/or links regarding the use of NTCs in
electrical equipment.

Thanks 

Peter Merguerian
Managing Director
Product Testing Division
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
Hacharoshet 26, POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel

Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019
e-mail: pmerguer...@itl.co.il
website: http://www.itl.co.il 






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Equipment Rental

2000-07-10 Thread reheller



I need to rent the following equipment (preferrably in Darlington, U.K.):

* Antennas (EMC 30-1000 MHz)
* Spectrum Analyzer/EMI Receiver
* Pre-amp (30-1000 MHz)

Anyone know of a company?

Regards,
Bob Heller



---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment

2000-07-10 Thread Dick Grobner

Raychem (www.raychem.com)is one manufacturer that have PTC's that are UL
Recognized. I'm not sure if they have NTC's. We use their PTC's as
resettable overload devices (in transformers mainly) in our UL Certified
product line (medical). We have never had a problem with UL evaluating the
devices with PTC's. We have been using them successfully for 5 years. No
experience with NTC's but do know they can be used as a limiter for in-rush
currents.
List of companies that Mfg NTC's (UL recognized?)
Western Electronic Corp 805-482-8002
Sensor Scientific 800-524-1610 (www.sensorsci.com)
Ketema 714-630-0081 

FYI: Sensor Scientific has a planning guide for NTC's

Good Luck!

-Original Message-
From: Peter Merguerian [mailto:pmerguer...@itl.co.il]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 9:58 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment



Dear All,

I have seen some design where NTCs are used to limit inrush currents in
motion controllers. 

Q. Are NTCs safe and reliable as means to limit inrush currents?

Q. Are there safety considerations to consider for circuits employing NTCs?

Q. Are there any Approved (previously evaluated) NTC components out there?


I appreciate all of your comments and/or links regarding the use of NTCs in
electrical equipment.

Thanks 

Peter Merguerian
Managing Director
Product Testing Division
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
Hacharoshet 26, POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel

Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019
e-mail: pmerguer...@itl.co.il
website: http://www.itl.co.il 






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



New Spread Spectrum-Blue Tooth Workshop

2000-07-10 Thread Robert Jones


Hello Group,
This is to let you know that there is a workshop/seminar dealing with spread 
spectrum and bluetooth given by HH enterprise, led by Don Heirman.  Today 
is the last day for the discount.  Click on the link below to access the 
description and registration form.

   http://www.telecom-info-services.com/ssbtad.pdf
Robert.

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



New Spread Spectrum/

2000-07-10 Thread Robert Jones




Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Offre d'emploi

2000-07-10 Thread Jean-Pierre ORY

Dans le cadre de son développement  La société SMEE, située à VOIRON (38),
recherche  deux personnes dans les domaines suivants : 
1 - LABORATOIRE CEM et Sécurité ACTIONS MESURES
Laboratoire spécialisé dans les domaines de la Compatibilité
Electromagnétique et de la Sécurité Basse Tension.
Nous intervenons sur le plan européen (marquage CE) , mais aussi sur le
plan international (FCC, UL, CSA, GS,…).

2 - Définition des postes
1.  Fonction : Technicien d'essais (compatibilité électromagnétique)
Réaliser les essais confiés au laboratoire dans le domaine de la
Compatibilité Electromagnétique (CEM)
Réalise les essais CEM en accord avec les modes opératoires et le manuel
qualité.
Rédaction des comptes-rendus d'essai suivant les formes pré - définies du
laboratoire (français et/ou anglais).
Développer une expertise dans l'interprétation et la résolution des
problèmes en CEM .

2.  Fonction : Technicien d'essais (sécurité électrique)
Réaliser les essais confiés au laboratoire dans le domaine de la Sécurité
électrique
Réalise les essais de sécurité en accord avec les modes opératoires et le
manuel qualité.
Rédaction des comptes-rendus d'essai suivant les formes pré - définies du
laboratoire (français et/ou anglais).
Développer une expertise dans l'interprétation et la résolution des
problèmes en sécurité.

3 - Profil recherché

-   Bac +2 minimum
-   Un minimum d'expérience dans la CEM ou la sécurité  
-   Domaine électronique ou physique
-   Bonne connaissance de l'anglais
-   Bonne maîtrise de l'outil informatique 
-   Disponibilité
-   Sens de l'organisation

4 - Conditions 

-   Salaire suivant expérience
-   Contrat CDI après une période de 6 mois en CDD
-   Adaptation du candidat aux postes proposés



Contact  Jean-Pierre ORY  Tél :  04 76 65 76 50 

E-mail : or...@aol.com

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



CPSTC safety meeting notice for July 13, 2000

2000-07-10 Thread RichardG
Greetings,

For those of you who are interested in attending the Colorado Product Safety
Technical Committee (CPSTC) meeting, please read on.

Quick summary:

NOTE Date change.
1. Next meeting: Thursday July 13, 2000 
   Location:Exabyte, 
1685 38th Street
Boulder, CO
   Start time will be 6:30pm.

2. Future technical paper topics.

3. Agenda for year 2000.

4. Bill LaFollette, Ron Duffy and Richard Georgerian next paper on
transformers.

5. Mark Hassebrock is thinking about writing a paper also.

If you plan on attending, please let me know so I can plan accordingly with
the food and drinks. If you need a map, let me know.

For more details please visit the Product Safety News web site:  
 http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/index.htm

 
Thanks in advance.

Richard Georgerian
CPSTC Chairman
Product Compliance Engineer
Exabyte
1685 38th Street
Boulder, CO  80301
USA



Product Safety Opening in N. California

2000-07-10 Thread Volgstadt, Roger

Ladies and Gentlemen,


Compaq Computer Corporation is looking for a Senior Product Safety
Engineer to join its Tandem Division in Cupertino, California. The qualified
engineer should have at least 5 to 8 years of hands-on product safety
compliance experience and have worked within Canadian Standards
Association's (CSA) category certification and TUV's ACT programs. The work
requires an excellent knowledge of ITE safety standards and good lab skills.
The ideal candidate should be creative, technically competent,
self-motivated and results oriented. He needs to be skilled at building
positive relationships as an interactive team player, have strong
presentation skills, be able to multi-task, fulfill commitments and develop
practical solutions to problems. The position will support the development
of Compaq's high availability products, from conception to production. The
safety test lab facilities are excellent.

Compaq has great benefits.  Interested persons should reply directly
to Chan Moore (chan.mo...@compaq.com mailto:chan.mo...@compaq.com , or by
fax to 408-285-2553).


Roger Volgstadt

Tandem Division
Compaq Computer Corporation




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Are NTCs Safe to Use in Electrical Equipment

2000-07-10 Thread Peter Merguerian

Dear All,

I have seen some design where NTCs are used to limit inrush currents in
motion controllers. 

Q. Are NTCs safe and reliable as means to limit inrush currents?

Q. Are there safety considerations to consider for circuits employing NTCs?

Q. Are there any Approved (previously evaluated) NTC components out there?


I appreciate all of your comments and/or links regarding the use of NTCs in
electrical equipment.

Thanks 

Peter Merguerian
Managing Director
Product Testing Division
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
Hacharoshet 26, POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel

Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019
e-mail: pmerguer...@itl.co.il
website: http://www.itl.co.il 






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Notified Body Number

2000-07-10 Thread WOODS
I just discovered the Commission's statement on marking in the Sept. 1999
publication Guide to the implementation of directives based upon the New
Approach and the Global Approach. Section 7.3 says, A notified body may be
involved in the design phase, the production phase, or both, depending on
the conformity assessment procedures applied. The CE marking shall only be
followed by the identification number of the notified body if it is involved
in the production phase. Thus the identification number of a notified body
involved in conformity assessment according to Module B does not follow the
CE marking.

Therefore, it appears that a product subject to Annex III or IV of the RTTE
must have a NB marking but, according to the above, it cannot follow the CE
marking since the NB is not involved in the production phase.

Richard Woods

--
From:  prob...@nmi.nl [SMTP:prob...@nmi.nl]
Sent:  Monday, July 10, 2000 10:52 AM
To:  wo...@sensormatic.com
Cc:  emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; t...@world.std.com
Subject:  Re: Notified Body Number



Richard,

Directive 93/68/EC (Article 5), which linked the CE marking to the
EMC
directive, states that the minimum height of the CE marking must be
5 mm. The
Maritime Directive requires a CE marking which also includes the NB
number. From
the example drawing in the directive it shows that the height of the
NB number
is identical to the height of the CE marking. The distance of the NB
number to
the CE marking is based on the distance between the characters C and
E.

The marking for the RTTE Directive would then look like: CE XXX,
where XXX is
the NB number.

Best regards,
NMi Certin B.V.

Pieter Robben
Department of EMC, Telecommunications and Electrical Safety

Web: www.nmicertin.com / www.nmicertin.nl






wo...@sensormatic.com on 10/07/2000 14:54:46

Please respond to wo...@sensormatic.com

To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org, t...@world.std.com
cc:(bcc: Pieter Robben/Nmi)

Subject:  Notified Body Number




Neither the LV nor the RTTE Directive indicates the minimal size for
the
Notified Body number nor do they indicate the placement of the
number
relative to the CE marking. Do any of the other directives or any
other
documents from the Commission indicate the proper way to size and
place the
Notified Body number?

Richard Woods







Re: Notified Body Number

2000-07-10 Thread probben


Richard,

Directive 93/68/EC (Article 5), which linked the CE marking to the EMC
directive, states that the minimum height of the CE marking must be 5 mm. The
Maritime Directive requires a CE marking which also includes the NB number. From
the example drawing in the directive it shows that the height of the NB number
is identical to the height of the CE marking. The distance of the NB number to
the CE marking is based on the distance between the characters C and E.

The marking for the RTTE Directive would then look like: CE XXX, where XXX is
the NB number.

Best regards,
NMi Certin B.V.

Pieter Robben
Department of EMC, Telecommunications and Electrical Safety

Web: www.nmicertin.com / www.nmicertin.nl






wo...@sensormatic.com on 10/07/2000 14:54:46

Please respond to wo...@sensormatic.com

To:   emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org, t...@world.std.com
cc:(bcc: Pieter Robben/Nmi)

Subject:  Notified Body Number




Neither the LV nor the RTTE Directive indicates the minimal size for the
Notified Body number nor do they indicate the placement of the number
relative to the CE marking. Do any of the other directives or any other
documents from the Commission indicate the proper way to size and place the
Notified Body number?

Richard Woods







Re: EU Requirements for PSTN Equipment

2000-07-10 Thread Don Moncion

from 1999/5/EC article 10;

3. Telecommunications terminal equipment which does not make use of the
spectrum allocated to  terrestrial/space radio communication and receiving parts
of radio equipment shall be subject to the  procedures described in any one of
Annexes II, IV or V at the choice of the manufacturer.

suggest you read the relevant annexes of RTTE directive to determine best
approach

list of Harmonized Standards, Notified Bodies and copy of directive are
available at European Union website http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rtte/

regards,

Don Moncion
Director Eng Services
Cadence Design Systems

Loop, Robert wrote:

 Group:

 I need detailed information on (a) which standards would apply to test a
 switching device (similar to a PBX machine) that connects to the PSTN on a
 customer site under the R  TTE Directive (b) the process by which a
 manufacturer contacts a Notified Body in the EU for approval (c) where I can
 locate a list of Notified Bodies for said directive (d) is the manufacturer
 required to have their QA, manufacturing and design processes approved to EN
 29003?

 My underlying assumption is that the product, which uses a cross-connect
 robot, would fall under the EMC, LVD and Machinery Directives also.  My
 knowledge of the R  TTE Directive is limited.

 As always, one cannot be an expert in everything.  My thanks to those who
 respond in advance.

 Sincerely,
 Robert Loop
 Engineering Supervisor
 Wyle Laboratories
 Product Safety
 ph - (256) 837-4411 x313
 fax- (256) 721-0144
 e-mail: rl...@hnt.wylelabs.com

 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: Notified Body Number

2000-07-10 Thread Andrea Bishop

Richard,

If you look on the Commission RTTE pages there is a section in the FAQs
which relates to marking.

This states with respect to radio equipment that uses non-harmonised
frequency bands :

With regard to the putting into service of these types of equipment the
alert sign shall be added to the CE marking:

Depending on the conformity assessment procedure followed by the
manufacturer the identification numbers of the relevant Notified Bodies
shall be included in the CE marking

By saying that the NB number must be included in the CE marking implies that
the rules governing its size, given in Annex VII of the Directive, apply to
the complete marking.

(Mrs) Andrea Bishop
Compliance Manager
BABT Product Service Ltd
Segensworth Road
Fareham, Hants
PO15 5RH, UK
Tel: +44 1329 443486



-Original Message-
From: wo...@sensormatic.com [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com]
Sent: 10 July 2000 13:55
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; t...@world.std.com
Subject: Notified Body Number


Neither the LV nor the RTTE Directive indicates the minimal size for the
Notified Body number nor do they indicate the placement of the number
relative to the CE marking. Do any of the other directives or any other
documents from the Commission indicate the proper way to size and place the
Notified Body number?

Richard Woods

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: MIL STD 461

2000-07-10 Thread Price, Ed

The DAPS link will get you only the latest release; i.e., 461E (462 is now
merged into 461E). But not very many programs have reached the testing stage
yet, so I still see a lot of 461D/462D requirements. You can get 461D, 462D
and 464 at the SPAWAR link:

http://www-chas.nosc.mil/spawar/pdf/MIL461D.PDF


Ed


:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Ed  Price
ed.pr...@cubic.com
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA.  USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (Fax)
Military  Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)



 -Original Message-
 From: Gonzalez, Rocky (Kenneth P) [mailto:kpgon...@ingr.com]
 Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:00 PM
 To: lfresea...@aol.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: RE: MIL STD 461
 
 
 
 Derek,
   This link worked for me.
 http://astimage.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
 
 Rocky
 -)-(-
 
 -Original Message-
 From: lfresea...@aol.com [mailto:lfresea...@aol.com]
 Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 9:35 AM
 To: emc-p...@ieee.org
 Subject: MIL STD 461
 
 
 
 Hi,
 
 can anyone remind me where the MIL STD 461 can be download from?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Derek.
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 
 
 ---
 This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
 Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
 
 To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
  majord...@ieee.org
 with the single line:
  unsubscribe emc-pstc
 
 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 
 For policy questions, send mail to:
  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 
 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Notified Body Number

2000-07-10 Thread WOODS

Neither the LV nor the RTTE Directive indicates the minimal size for the
Notified Body number nor do they indicate the placement of the number
relative to the CE marking. Do any of the other directives or any other
documents from the Commission indicate the proper way to size and place the
Notified Body number?

Richard Woods

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: EU Requirements for PSTN Equipment

2000-07-10 Thread Corinne SALINGRE
Hello,
My answers hereunder.

Loop, Robert wrote :

 Group:

 I need detailed information on (a) which standards would apply to test a
 switching device (similar to a PBX machine) that connects to the PSTN on a
 customer site under the R  TTE Directive

a) You can use TBR21 standard to get part of the answer. But this test is not
regulated by RTTE Directive. This directive only includes EMC and safety
aspects as essential requirmeents for non-radio products. Interworking with the
network (as tested by former non radio TBR) is no longer essential requirement
for non radio terminal equipment.

 (b) the process by which a
 manufacturer contacts a Notified Body in the EU for approval

b) If there is no radio in your product or if there is only radio receptor in
it, the normal way under RTTE is to go through the Declaration of Conformity.
You don't need any NB or other external authority (you can go to NB if you want
but you do not have to).

 (c) where I can
 locate a list of Notified Bodies for said directive

c) No list for the moment. The RTTE directive is not yet translated into
national law throughout EU. It is expected that DG Entreprise will publish such
a list on its web site.
Useful information on :
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rtte/index.htm

 (d) is the manufacturer
 required to have their QA, manufacturing and design processes approved to EN
 29003?

d) You can but you do not have to.
The manufacturer (if located in EU) or the person responsible for the entry on
the EU market will have to declare the conformity of the product and have
internal processes to ensure that any product coming on the market is compliant
with the essential requirements.
I would suggest to have a QA but it is not mandatory under RTTE.
(this can be considered as a quality issue regarding  customers = i.e. a
marketing issue not a regulatory issue!).



 My underlying assumption is that the product, which uses a cross-connect
 robot, would fall under the EMC, LVD and Machinery Directives also.  My
 knowledge of the R  TTE Directive is limited.

If your product falls under RTTE directive, this directive includes EMC and
LVD.
Concerning Machinery, I would appreciate if specialists can answer, including
relations between Machinery and RTTE, which I am not familiar at all with. And
especially if there are any other safety and/or EMC issues included in the
machinery directive.

Regards.
Corinne SALINGRE
CS TELECOM, Paris, France