RE: RJ45 filtered connector

2001-12-26 Thread Reginald Henry
FYI,

 

This is an interesting web site for connectors et al 

 

http://www.mouse.demon.nl/ckp/misc/conchart.htm
http://www.mouse.demon.nl/ckp/misc/conchart.htm 

 

RH

 

 

-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 6:10 PM
To: 'Bill Owsley'; 'John Shinn'; 'Reginald Henry';
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: RJ45 filtered connector


Acutally, the term RJ is used by the FCC for designating 
connectors that are part of the registration (now approval) 
process.  So why would you want to call a ethernet connector 
by a designation used by the telephone industry?
 
I am not going to police the use of the term, but I wanted 
to put that information out to everyone. 
 
Regards, 
 
John Shinn

-Original Message-
From: Bill Owsley [mailto:ows...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:32 PM
To: John Shinn; 'Reginald Henry'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: RJ45 filtered connector


so if we called it an RJ-48C, would that be better ??


At 04:56 PM 12/20/2001 , John Shinn wrote:



Although it may suprise some, and I may get flak, but
an RJ45 connector is an specific configuration used
exclusively for a programmable data connection.  It
has a specific wiring configuration.  The RJ
stands for Registered Jack.  This is an FCC designation
of that specific configuration.

There is nothing against using an 8-pin modular plug/jack
for 10Base-Tor 100Base-T, or even microphone inputs
to my Ham radio, but do not call it a RJ45.

Now, yes, there are several vendors that produce shielded and
filtered 8-pin modular jacks.  I remember using them and
working with several vendors a few years ago, but I would
suggest you look at the website or catalogs of the major
connector suppliers.

John Shinn, P.E.
Manager, Lab. Operations.
Sanmina-SCI


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[ mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On
mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org%5DOn  Behalf Of Reginald Henry
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:51 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE:RJ45 filtered connector



To All,

Can anyone out there tell me where I would be able to purchase a fully
shielded and filter
RJ45 connector that is Bulkhead mountable.

The RJ45 must be able to handle data rates from 10Base T to 100Base T

I will be performing CE testing in the chamber so it must be bulkhead
mountable !


Thanks and Happy Holidays to YOU ALL !

Reg

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ 

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ 

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server. 



Bill Owsley,   ows...@cisco.com 
919) 392-8341

Compliance Engineer
Cisco Systems
7025 Kit Creek Road
POB 14987
RTP. NC. 27709





Re: noise figure

2001-12-26 Thread Robert Macy

NoiseFigure new
  = sqrt (  ( NF1^2 - 1 )  + ( NF2^2 - 1 ) + ( NF3^2 - 1 ) + ... + 1 )
 where all noise figures are ratios and referenced to a
single location.


A few points:

1  Definition:
Noise Figure is the ratio of increased noise in a system above the expected
level of Johnson noise.  For our 50 ohm system that will give a voltage of
sqrt(4KTRBw)  where K is Boltzmann's constant, T is temperature in absolute
Kelvin, R is the resistance of the system (for our case 25 ohms {50 ohms in
parallel with 50 ohms}), and Bw is the bandwidth of interest in Hertz.  For
a Bw of 1 MHz that yields a noise floor of around 0.641uV, or -3.9dBuV


2  Relate noise figure to some place in your system.
For simplicity (and ease of using specs) relate to the front end  Noise
figure specs relate to the front end of a system block.  The noise is
amplified, or attenuated, along with the signal and therefore track
together.  As you go from the output to the input of each system block, gain
subtracts from the NF and attenuation adds to the NF.  Modify the Noise
Figure by each block you must go through to get to the input.  For example,
through cable loss, add the few dB.  For gain, subtract the gain.

3  Make up a list (Use Excell spread sheets)  You will end up with
contributions from every block now referenced to the front end.  then...

4  Remember that uncorrelated noise does not add, but adds as the square
root of the sum of squares.  However! you must only take into consideration
the noise contribution from each additional noise source.  You cannot keep
adding in the contribution from the 50 ohm source impedance.  Therefore,
each Noise Figure ratio must be squared and then have 1 subtracted from it.
After combining all the contributions, you will add the 1 back.  Simply take
the square root of that total sum and find the 20log value and you will have
your total system's new NoiseFigure.


For example, let's find the noise figure for a receiving system that
attaches to an antenna consisting of long cable, amp, cable, and spectrum
analyzer (SA).

Passive devices have 0 dB noise figure (they do not add any noise)

Antenna is passive, but converts volts per meter into volts in a 50 ohm
system.  Since it does not add any noise, there is no difference between
minimizing the NF at the antenna port or at the field that it measures.



So let's find out the NF of our system  at 200MHz

long cable 3dB attenuation
amp24dB   6 dB NF
cable   -
SA  32dB

Note:  You could have a perfect receiver that contributes no noise located
after the long cable and you would still have a 3 dB NF   That's why
amplifiers are placed near the signal source.

Check your particular SA.  It can have a Noise Figure from 26dB to 36dB
depending on its design.  That means for a 1 MHz bandwidth you can only see
down to around -80dBm.

So let's move the amplifier out to the antenna and change the order of the
list:

cable   -
amp   gain 24dB with NF = 6 dB
long cable atten  3dB
SA with NF = 32dB

The list would show 6 dB NF at the input  and (32-24+3=11) 11dB from the SA.
That is a ratio of 2 and a ratio of 3.55.


New Noise Figure is sqrt(  (2^2-1) + (3.55^2-1) + 1 ) = 4 or 12dB
See how the SA still dominates?



To rewrite the equation:

NoiseFigure new
 = sqrt (  ( NF1^2 - 1 )  + ( NF2^2 - 1 ) + ( NF3^2 - 1 ) + ... +
1 )
 where all noise figures are ratios and referenced to a
single location.

  - Robert -

   Robert A. Macy, PEm...@california.com
   408 286 3985  fx 408 297 9121
   AJM International Electronics Consultants
   619 North First St,   San Jose, CA  95112


-Original Message-
From: KC CHAN [PDD] kcc...@hkpc.org
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:46 PM
Subject: noise figure



Hi all

It may not be purely EMC question, actually it is RF related, but I am sure
the experts here can answer my questions.

We all know that we need to have a pre-amp. that is as lower noise figure
as possible, but how low it is enough or how it is related to the noise
floor viewed by a receiver or spectrum analyzer.

Thank you
KC Chan




---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:  

RE: RJ45 filtered connector

2001-12-26 Thread David_Sterner
John,
 
The pertinent specification, ANSI/IEEE 802.3 (a.k.a. ISO/IEC8802.3),
describes the Ethernet physical layer plug/jack as an RJ-45.  ArcNet
twisted pair was RJ-11.
 
If you purchase jacks that include internal filters, be sure the filters are
designed for Ethernet/F-E (10BaseT  100BaseTX).  Some ferrite filters are
designed to suppress digital noise in voice telephone lines.  These ferrites
can cause 'back pressure' on the digital signal, resulting in cable-length
sensitivity;  i.e. the impedance curve no longer meets 802.3. You can live
with cable-length sensitivity on emissions (to 'isolate' the EUT), but
expect diminished RF immunity with certain cable lengths when filters are
inserted in the T-P line.
 
Ethernet components are rigorously tested for 802.3 compliance (waveforms,
jitter, SQE, bit-error rate) and for compatibility with components from
other manufacturers.  These compatibility-suite tests are performed without
any additional T-P line filters.  Any altered interface is your
responsibility;  results may or may not represent real world installations.
 
David
 

-Original Message-
From: John Shinn [mailto:john.sh...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 6:10 PM
To: 'Bill Owsley'; 'John Shinn'; 'Reginald Henry';
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: RJ45 filtered connector


Acutally, the term RJ is used by the FCC for designating 
connectors that are part of the registration (now approval) 
process.  So why would you want to call a ethernet connector 
by a designation used by the telephone industry?
 
I am not going to police the use of the term, but I wanted 
to put that information out to everyone. 
 
Regards, 
 
John Shinn

-Original Message-
From: Bill Owsley [mailto:ows...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:32 PM
To: John Shinn; 'Reginald Henry'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: RJ45 filtered connector


so if we called it an RJ-48C, would that be better ??


At 04:56 PM 12/20/2001 , John Shinn wrote:



Although it may suprise some, and I may get flak, but
an RJ45 connector is an specific configuration used
exclusively for a programmable data connection.  It
has a specific wiring configuration.  The RJ
stands for Registered Jack.  This is an FCC designation
of that specific configuration.

There is nothing against using an 8-pin modular plug/jack
for 10Base-Tor 100Base-T, or even microphone inputs
to my Ham radio, but do not call it a RJ45.

Now, yes, there are several vendors that produce shielded and
filtered 8-pin modular jacks.  I remember using them and
working with several vendors a few years ago, but I would
suggest you look at the website or catalogs of the major
connector suppliers.

John Shinn, P.E.
Manager, Lab. Operations.
Sanmina-SCI


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[ mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On
mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org%5DOn  Behalf Of Reginald Henry
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:51 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE:RJ45 filtered connector



To All,

Can anyone out there tell me where I would be able to purchase a fully
shielded and filter
RJ45 connector that is Bulkhead mountable.

The RJ45 must be able to handle data rates from 10Base T to 100Base T

I will be performing CE testing in the chamber so it must be bulkhead
mountable !


Thanks and Happy Holidays to YOU ALL !

Reg

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ 

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ 

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online 

RE: RJ45 filtered connector

2001-12-26 Thread Reginald Henry

Ron,

Thank you for your assistance in getting me closer to completing my task at
hand !

I really like the different alternative solutions that you have provided for
me.

I also tend to agree with you, in terms of the speeds ( Category 3 aka ...
Cat 3 for 10 Base  T, 

Category 5 aka  Cat 5 for 100Base T)I will be working with, does not lend
itself well to traverse 

thru mixed connectors ( terminations , DB connectors, etc ).

My understanding in the little education that I have gotten since I first
started investigating 

these connectors,is that the degree in which the wires are twisted ( number
of twist per xxx 

distance )will make all the difference in the world if the information
(data) gets thru or not.

Once again thanks a million.

PS. I loved your comment about the flames... very appropriate ! LOL


Reg


-Original Message-
From: Ron Pickard [mailto:rpick...@hypercom.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 5:40 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: rhe...@vicon-cctv.com
Subject: RE: RJ45 filtered connector




Hi Reg,

Trying to find a bulkhead RJ45 (shielded  filtered) connector for an EMC
chamber may prove to be an
impossible task as, IMHO, this type of connector might be fairly fragile and
hard to install for
such use. To that end, I will offer some suggestions:

1. Talk to chamber manufacturers. I am quite sure that they would know about
such a connector if one
exists.

2. A bulkhead mounted DB25 connector might work. These can come filtered,
however, the filtering
involved should not impact the communication speeds you will be working
with. To connect to standard
ethernet cables, use 2x(DB25-RJ45) adapters (1 inside  1 outside). The
whole thing would be
connected as Outside Cable - Adapter - Bulkhead DB Connector - Adapter -
Inside Cable. These
adapters are quite common and shouldn't need to be filtered as the DB
connectors would do that and
if extra filtering is needed, a simple clip-on ferrite might be all that's
needed (the ferrite might
even be put inside the adapter backshell). And, the DB25 connector might be
used for other
interfaces during testing, as well.

3. You shouldn't need any connector if your EMC chamber has a ventilation
opening. Just fit a cable
thru the opening and put enough ferrite around the cable (inside and
outside) to suppress any common
mode interference.

These suggestions are intended to get all those neurons firing to think of
some connector
alternatives to the one you're seeking. I hope this helps.

Comments anyone? Bring on the flames.  :-)

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
rpick...@hypercom.com





 

JK15@exchange.SanDiego

CA.NCR.comTo:
rhe...@vicon-cctv.com, emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org   
Sent by:  cc:

owner-emc-pstc@majordomo.iSubject: RE: RJ45
filtered connector 
eee.org

 

 

12/20/01 12:34 PM

Please respond to JK15

 

 






Reg,

Look at Regal Electronics at http://www.regalusa.com.  They have board
mounted RJ-45 that have gasketing appropriate for a panel.

Jim


Jim Knighten, Ph.D.
Teradata, a Division of NCRhttp://www.ncr.com
17095 Via Del Campo
San Diego, CA 92127
USA
Tel: 858-485-2537
Fax: 858-485-3788
jim.knigh...@ncr.com

 -Original Message-
From:   Reginald Henry [mailto:rhe...@vicon-cctv.com]
Sent:   Thursday, December 20, 2001 10:51 AM
To:emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:RE:RJ45 filtered connector


To All,

Can anyone out there tell me where I would be able to purchase a fully
shielded and filter
RJ45 connector that is Bulkhead mountable.

The RJ45 must be able to handle data rates from 10Base T to 100Base T

I will be performing CE testing in the chamber so it must be bulkhead
mountable !


Thanks and Happy Holidays to YOU ALL !

Reg

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To 

Portable Fire Extinguishers

2001-12-26 Thread Peter Merguerian

Hello Group,

Does anyone know the CE Directives and standards for portable fire
extinguishers?

This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate,
distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you
received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the
message and its attachments to the sender.






PETER S. MERGUERIAN
Technical Director
I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd.
26 Hacharoshet St., POB 211
Or Yehuda 60251, Israel
Tel: + 972-(0)3-5339022  Fax: + 972-(0)3-5339019
Mobile: + 972-(0)54-838175






---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.