Re: [PSES] Battery certification issue
In message <007501cfc6f7$be0b7f40$3a227dc0$@cs.com>, dated Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Pete Perkins <0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> writes: The cert lab enginer, however, wants full pedigree papers for the batteries citing which clause of which standard? - which the mfgr feels is not needed. citing which clause of which standard? Safety standards should cover everything, and most do, so there is no room for 'want' or 'feel'. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Quid faciamus nisi sit? John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)
This issue has been in effect since Jan. 1, 2010. See: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/2013/13_587.pdf or: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/2014/14_587.pdf If you are a consultant (i.e. – Self Employed), the company you performed the services for is required to send you a Form 1099-MISC if your income exceeds $600. CA requires them to to withhold 7% (certain exceptions apply). This basically means that CA wants their share of the state taxes from income sourced in CA. I can understand your frustration with the situation. It is not all that uncommon. See my other comments later. FYI, in addition to my own Engineering & Management consulting, I am also a Registered Tax Professional with both the IRS and CA. I hope that sheds some light on the situation. Regards, John Shinn, Ph.D., P.E. -Original Message- From: Ken Javor Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 7:27 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't) Unless you're in show business. There's no business like show business - it's subsidized by the taxes everyone else pays. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 > From: "Nyffenegger, Dave" > Reply-To: "Nyffenegger, Dave" > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:21:20 + > To: > Conversation: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > > So if my employer who is not CA based but does have other direct employees in > CA, sends me to CA for a few days to work, they have to take out the CA income > tax too? No. Withholding is not required if payees (YOUR COMPANY) are residents or have a permanent place of business in California. That would be the case as sited above. > > Seems like CA has put up a big closed for business sign. > -Dave > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 6:16 PM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > > Doug, > > Thank you so much for pointing this out. I have many CA customers, but > luckily to date it has all been remote. > > Rest assured that in the future it will stay that way! > > Ken Javor > Phone: (256) 650-5261 > > >> From: Doug Smith >> Organization: D. C. Smith Consultants >> Reply-To: >> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:37:05 -0700 >> To: >> Subject: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and >> got there on business!!! (Don't) >> >> Hi All, >> >> Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially >> anyone who visits California, even for a day, on business. What is happening is that they want to have whoever pays you (if they are located in CA) and your payment is CA sourced withhold a percentage of your CA sourced income. This means you would pay CA tax on income earned in CA. However, you would have to file a non-resident return in CA and a regular return in your home state. But, the income earned in CA should not be taxed in your home state, and any income earned in your home state would not be taxed in CA. >> >> CA has new rules that require companies there (they don't all know >> about it yet but will be in trouble after the first of the year if >> they don't) to withhold CA income tax from payments made to people >> from out of state if any of the work was done in CA. >> >> You need to fill out a tax form for every job/trip! It is "California >> Form 587, Nonresident Withholding Allocation Worksheet." In my case >> the client ignored the form and sent the maximum 7% of the gross >> proceeds in to CA. >> >> The company for whom you do work is required to deduct 7% from the >> gross payment to you, no allowance for expenses or, at least for the >> last job I did, the fact the job required 3 days in NV and two in CA. >> They took out 7% and sent it to the CA state government. >> >> The accounting for this is going to be tricky as you have to keep >> track and justify how much of the work was in CA and how much >> elsewhere. In the end, CA may extract up to 10% of your payment, 13% >> if you are really well off. I suspect the accounting and submitting >> tax forms will cost as much as the tax, or more. >> >> So starting now I am dividing my fee by 0.93 to cover the tax and >> probably need to at least double that to cover my time and the >> accountants time to keep track of all of this. I am thinking along the >> lines of $500/day additional to CA companies until I get a better idea >> of what this is going to cost. >> >> Although we don't have an income tax in NV they get it in other ways, >> such as $2000/year from me for a special rental car tax meant to hit >> tourists, as well as other taxes. I you come in from Massachusetts, >> for instance, you will be r
Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)
Unless you're in show business. There's no business like show business - it's subsidized by the taxes everyone else pays. Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 > From: "Nyffenegger, Dave" > Reply-To: "Nyffenegger, Dave" > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:21:20 + > To: > Conversation: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > > So if my employer who is not CA based but does have other direct employees in > CA, sends me to CA for a few days to work, they have to take out the CA income > tax too? > > Seems like CA has put up a big closed for business sign. > -Dave > > -Original Message- > From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 6:16 PM > To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG > Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got > there on business!!! (Don't) > > Doug, > > Thank you so much for pointing this out. I have many CA customers, but > luckily to date it has all been remote. > > Rest assured that in the future it will stay that way! > > Ken Javor > Phone: (256) 650-5261 > > >> From: Doug Smith >> Organization: D. C. Smith Consultants >> Reply-To: >> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:37:05 -0700 >> To: >> Subject: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and >> got there on business!!! (Don't) >> >> Hi All, >> >> Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially >> anyone who visits California, even for a day, on business. >> >> CA has new rules that require companies there (they don't all know >> about it yet but will be in trouble after the first of the year if >> they don't) to withhold CA income tax from payments made to people >> from out of state if any of the work was done in CA. >> >> You need to fill out a tax form for every job/trip! It is "California >> Form 587, Nonresident Withholding Allocation Worksheet." In my case >> the client ignored the form and sent the maximum 7% of the gross >> proceeds in to CA. >> >> The company for whom you do work is required to deduct 7% from the >> gross payment to you, no allowance for expenses or, at least for the >> last job I did, the fact the job required 3 days in NV and two in CA. >> They took out 7% and sent it to the CA state government. >> >> The accounting for this is going to be tricky as you have to keep >> track and justify how much of the work was in CA and how much >> elsewhere. In the end, CA may extract up to 10% of your payment, 13% >> if you are really well off. I suspect the accounting and submitting >> tax forms will cost as much as the tax, or more. >> >> So starting now I am dividing my fee by 0.93 to cover the tax and >> probably need to at least double that to cover my time and the >> accountants time to keep track of all of this. I am thinking along the >> lines of $500/day additional to CA companies until I get a better idea >> of what this is going to cost. >> >> Although we don't have an income tax in NV they get it in other ways, >> such as $2000/year from me for a special rental car tax meant to hit >> tourists, as well as other taxes. I you come in from Massachusetts, >> for instance, you will be required to pay MA and CA income taxes! That >> plus Federal will be over 50% for most engineers (CA is 10% at $44,000 >> per year). >> >> I am interested to find out if I am the first person to run into this. >> If you go into CA for work purposes you will be hit for this. I plan >> to ask the CA tax people which precinct they are going to allow me to vote >> in. >> >> Doug >> >> -- >> University of Oxford Tutor >> Department for Continuing Education >> Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom >> -- >> ___ _Doug Smith >>\ / ) P.O. Box 60941 >> = Boulder City, NV 89006-0941 >> _ / \ / \ _TEL/FAX: 702-570-6108/570-6013 >>/ /\ \ ] / /\ \ Mobile: 408-858-4528 >> | q-( ) | o | Email: d...@dsmith.org >>\ _ /]\ _ / Web: http://www.dsmith.org >> -- >> >> - >> >> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society >> emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your >> e-mail to >> >> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: >> http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html >> >> Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities >> site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for >> graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. >> >> Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ >> Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
Re: [PSES] Battery certification issue
Hi Pete, If it is for CB Scheme, that rule was put out by IECEE in 2011 with exemption to TC108 standards. For others, unless it is Hazardous Location or Intrinsic Safety, it is probably based on the lab exactly how the situation is handled. Best Regards, Jody Leber Consumer Testing Services Global Battery and Accumulator Technical Manager Battery, Energy Efficiency and Safety Laboratory Manager Direct: 770.570.1838 Main: 770.570.1800 Mobile: 678.469.9835 -Original Message- From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 5:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Battery certification issue PSNet, Working with a client who is caught in a battery certification issue during a product certification. This product uses Ni-metal hydride rechargable batteries. All the certification focus seemed to have moved to Li based batteries with not a lot of concern for older constructions. The cert lab enginer, however, wants full pedigree papers for the batteries - which the mfgr feels is not needed. Wot's the experience of others on this net? :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety Engineer PO Box 23427 Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 503/452-1201 fone/fax p.perk...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald: Information in this email and any attachments is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed or otherwise directed. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The Company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. All SGS services are rendered in accordance with the applicable SGS conditions of service available on request and accessible at http://www.sgs.com/en/Terms-and-Conditions.aspx - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)
So if my employer who is not CA based but does have other direct employees in CA, sends me to CA for a few days to work, they have to take out the CA income tax too? Seems like CA has put up a big closed for business sign. -Dave -Original Message- From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 6:16 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't) Doug, Thank you so much for pointing this out. I have many CA customers, but luckily to date it has all been remote. Rest assured that in the future it will stay that way! Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 > From: Doug Smith > Organization: D. C. Smith Consultants > Reply-To: > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:37:05 -0700 > To: > Subject: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and > got there on business!!! (Don't) > > Hi All, > > Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially > anyone who visits California, even for a day, on business. > > CA has new rules that require companies there (they don't all know > about it yet but will be in trouble after the first of the year if > they don't) to withhold CA income tax from payments made to people > from out of state if any of the work was done in CA. > > You need to fill out a tax form for every job/trip! It is "California > Form 587, Nonresident Withholding Allocation Worksheet." In my case > the client ignored the form and sent the maximum 7% of the gross > proceeds in to CA. > > The company for whom you do work is required to deduct 7% from the > gross payment to you, no allowance for expenses or, at least for the > last job I did, the fact the job required 3 days in NV and two in CA. > They took out 7% and sent it to the CA state government. > > The accounting for this is going to be tricky as you have to keep > track and justify how much of the work was in CA and how much > elsewhere. In the end, CA may extract up to 10% of your payment, 13% > if you are really well off. I suspect the accounting and submitting > tax forms will cost as much as the tax, or more. > > So starting now I am dividing my fee by 0.93 to cover the tax and > probably need to at least double that to cover my time and the > accountants time to keep track of all of this. I am thinking along the > lines of $500/day additional to CA companies until I get a better idea > of what this is going to cost. > > Although we don't have an income tax in NV they get it in other ways, > such as $2000/year from me for a special rental car tax meant to hit > tourists, as well as other taxes. I you come in from Massachusetts, > for instance, you will be required to pay MA and CA income taxes! That > plus Federal will be over 50% for most engineers (CA is 10% at $44,000 > per year). > > I am interested to find out if I am the first person to run into this. > If you go into CA for work purposes you will be hit for this. I plan > to ask the CA tax people which precinct they are going to allow me to vote in. > > Doug > > -- > University of Oxford Tutor > Department for Continuing Education > Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom > -- > ___ _Doug Smith >\ / ) P.O. Box 60941 > = Boulder City, NV 89006-0941 > _ / \ / \ _TEL/FAX: 702-570-6108/570-6013 >/ /\ \ ] / /\ \ Mobile: 408-858-4528 > | q-( ) | o | Email: d...@dsmith.org >\ _ /]\ _ / Web: http://www.dsmith.org > -- > > - > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society > emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your > e-mail to > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities > site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for > graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell > > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher: > David Heald: - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the
Re: [PSES] Battery certification issue
Dunno, depends on safety standard for the end-use equipment, and where placed on market. For example, both 60950 and 60065 talk about equipment with installed batteries, where some of the clauses apply to any battery chemistry. Generic requirements for US would be UL2054 for much non-industrial stuff, and IEC62133 (but seems focused on Li) most elsewhere. For medical stuff, FDA wants you to have either 1642 (Li only) or 2054 certification. The other biggie for batteries is UN/IATA transport requirements. Brian -Original Message- From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:49 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Battery certification issue PSNet, Working with a client who is caught in a battery certification issue during a product certification. This product uses Ni-metal hydride rechargable batteries. All the certification focus seemed to have moved to Li based batteries with not a lot of concern for older constructions. The cert lab enginer, however, wants full pedigree papers for the batteries - which the mfgr feels is not needed. Wot's the experience of others on this net? :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety Engineer PO Box 23427 Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 503/452-1201 fone/fax p.perk...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
Re: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)
Doug, Thank you so much for pointing this out. I have many CA customers, but luckily to date it has all been remote. Rest assured that in the future it will stay that way! Ken Javor Phone: (256) 650-5261 > From: Doug Smith > Organization: D. C. Smith Consultants > Reply-To: > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:37:05 -0700 > To: > Subject: [PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there > on business!!! (Don't) > > Hi All, > > Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially > anyone who visits California, even for a day, on business. > > CA has new rules that require companies there (they don't all know about > it yet but will be in trouble after the first of the year if they don't) > to withhold CA income tax from payments made to people from out of state > if any of the work was done in CA. > > You need to fill out a tax form for every job/trip! It is "California > Form 587, Nonresident Withholding Allocation Worksheet." In my case the > client ignored the form and sent the maximum 7% of the gross proceeds in > to CA. > > The company for whom you do work is required to deduct 7% from the gross > payment to you, no allowance for expenses or, at least for the last job > I did, the fact the job required 3 days in NV and two in CA. They took > out 7% and sent it to the CA state government. > > The accounting for this is going to be tricky as you have to keep track > and justify how much of the work was in CA and how much elsewhere. In > the end, CA may extract up to 10% of your payment, 13% if you are really > well off. I suspect the accounting and submitting tax forms will cost as > much as the tax, or more. > > So starting now I am dividing my fee by 0.93 to cover the tax and > probably need to at least double that to cover my time and the > accountants time to keep track of all of this. I am thinking along the > lines of $500/day additional to CA companies until I get a better idea > of what this is going to cost. > > Although we don't have an income tax in NV they get it in other ways, > such as $2000/year from me for a special rental car tax meant to hit > tourists, as well as other taxes. I you come in from Massachusetts, for > instance, you will be required to pay MA and CA income taxes! That plus > Federal will be over 50% for most engineers (CA is 10% at $44,000 per > year). > > I am interested to find out if I am the first person to run into this. > If you go into CA for work purposes you will be hit for this. I plan to > ask the CA tax people which precinct they are going to allow me to vote in. > > Doug > > -- > University of Oxford Tutor > Department for Continuing Education > Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom > -- > ___ _Doug Smith >\ / ) P.O. Box 60941 > = Boulder City, NV 89006-0941 > _ / \ / \ _TEL/FAX: 702-570-6108/570-6013 >/ /\ \ ] / /\ \ Mobile: 408-858-4528 > | q-( ) | o | Email: d...@dsmith.org >\ _ /]\ _ / Web: http://www.dsmith.org > -- > > - > > This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc > discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to > > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html > > Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at > http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used > formats), large files, etc. > > Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ > Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to > unsubscribe) > List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Scott Douglas > Mike Cantwell > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Jim Bacher: > David Heald: - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
[PSES] Battery certification issue
PSNet, Working with a client who is caught in a battery certification issue during a product certification. This product uses Ni-metal hydride rechargable batteries. All the certification focus seemed to have moved to Li based batteries with not a lot of concern for older constructions. The cert lab enginer, however, wants full pedigree papers for the batteries - which the mfgr feels is not needed. Wot's the experience of others on this net? :>) br, Pete Peter E Perkins, PE Principal Product Safety Engineer PO Box 23427 Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 503/452-1201 fone/fax p.perk...@ieee.org - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
[PSES] Caution to those who live outside of California and got there on business!!! (Don't)
Hi All, Just a note to those of you, especially consultants, but potentially anyone who visits California, even for a day, on business. CA has new rules that require companies there (they don't all know about it yet but will be in trouble after the first of the year if they don't) to withhold CA income tax from payments made to people from out of state if any of the work was done in CA. You need to fill out a tax form for every job/trip! It is "California Form 587, Nonresident Withholding Allocation Worksheet." In my case the client ignored the form and sent the maximum 7% of the gross proceeds in to CA. The company for whom you do work is required to deduct 7% from the gross payment to you, no allowance for expenses or, at least for the last job I did, the fact the job required 3 days in NV and two in CA. They took out 7% and sent it to the CA state government. The accounting for this is going to be tricky as you have to keep track and justify how much of the work was in CA and how much elsewhere. In the end, CA may extract up to 10% of your payment, 13% if you are really well off. I suspect the accounting and submitting tax forms will cost as much as the tax, or more. So starting now I am dividing my fee by 0.93 to cover the tax and probably need to at least double that to cover my time and the accountants time to keep track of all of this. I am thinking along the lines of $500/day additional to CA companies until I get a better idea of what this is going to cost. Although we don't have an income tax in NV they get it in other ways, such as $2000/year from me for a special rental car tax meant to hit tourists, as well as other taxes. I you come in from Massachusetts, for instance, you will be required to pay MA and CA income taxes! That plus Federal will be over 50% for most engineers (CA is 10% at $44,000 per year). I am interested to find out if I am the first person to run into this. If you go into CA for work purposes you will be hit for this. I plan to ask the CA tax people which precinct they are going to allow me to vote in. Doug -- University of Oxford Tutor Department for Continuing Education Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom -- ___ _Doug Smith \ / ) P.O. Box 60941 = Boulder City, NV 89006-0941 _ / \ / \ _TEL/FAX: 702-570-6108/570-6013 / /\ \ ] / /\ \ Mobile: 408-858-4528 | q-( ) | o | Email: d...@dsmith.org \ _ /]\ _ / Web: http://www.dsmith.org -- - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
Re: [PSES] TCB Application in USA
Hi Dear Technical Colleagues I wonder if any of you know TCB Application in the US. Many thanks Eunice Yang CEM International Westmead House Westmead, Farnborough Hampshire, UK GU14 7LP Telephone:+44 (0)1252 547721 Email: i...@cem-international.co.uk - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas Mike Cantwell For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: David Heald:
