[PSES] ELP devices in Japan

2020-10-02 Thread MARIO DE ARANZETA
I've read information on several websites about extremely low power devices for 
Japan.  The fundamental limit being 500uV/m@3m for frequencies below 322 MHz.  
Does anyone know if this is a Q-P or Average.Also what is the limit for 
harmonics?
Thanks to all in advance,Mario de Aranzeta

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 


[PSES] intentional radiator in Europe

2020-06-04 Thread Mario de Aranzeta
In the US we can have an intentional radiator of a very low output power 
in any band except the restricted bands of 15.205 and 15.209.


This allowed under 15.209(a),(c). That is if you can keep the 
fundamental and harmonics under the radiated limits of 15.209.  Is this 
sort of thing possible in Europe.


The device in mind is a medical device that is ingested with the 
fundamental at 300 MHz and a field strength under 47 dBuV/m @3m I've 
looked through EN55011: 2016  Table 1 and footnotes and can't see that 
it is or isn't.


Thanks,

Mario de Aranzeta, N4TSV


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas 
Mike Cantwell 

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  
David Heald: 


[PSES] RF test cables

2014-01-27 Thread Mario De Aranzeta
I've always found Semflex to be a good choice for the money.  I believe
they have changed names but they should be still searchable.



The last cable I bought was their HP305.  Good to 18 GHz.  I wanted the
lowest loss with the widest bandwidth.



I have no  financial interest in the company.



Mario N4TSV

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@radiusnorth.net
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com