Re: NEC Question

2002-03-20 Thread MikSherman

Manufacturers of capital equipment for the semiconductor industry have been 
wrestling with these complicated listing problems for a while.

We sponsored an all-day meeting on the topic last summer, and the 207 pages 
of handouts from that meeting can be found at

http://www.semi.org/web/winitiatives.nsf/url/ehsW01NRTLpresent

which is on the web site of SEMI, our trade organization.

Mike Sherman
FSI International

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Ron Pickard:  emc-p...@hypercom.com
 Dave Heald:   davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
Click on browse and then emc-pstc mailing list


Re: Product Safety: A Matter of Law or Litigation?

2001-06-06 Thread MikSherman

Folks --

I've seen a lot of assertions in this email chain, some of which I'd like to 
challenge on a factual basis. Note that I am not disagreeing with what a 
prudent business decision might be, but am rather challenging the assertions 
of what the laws state.

1.  The General Product Safety Directive contains language right up front 
describing it as applying to consumer as opposed to other (commercial or 
industrial, I believe) products. It seems to me that this directive, then, 
does not apply by default, as asserted by some, if your product is for 
commercial or industrial use only.


2.  I believe that it's very clear that the Low Voltage Directive does not 
require use of EN standards.

3.  I believe that the concept of strict liability i.e., that one only has 
to prove that a product is defective, as opposed to proving negligence, is 
well-established in the USA.

Mike Sherman
FSI International

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
 Dave Healddavehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
 Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/  click on Virtual Conference Hall,




Re: Label Symbols?

2001-02-01 Thread MikSherman

In a message dated 1/31/2001 8:07:50 PM Central Standard Time, 
ggars...@us.tuv.com writes:

 According to EN 61010-1 (test equipment), which uses it,  exclamation
 point in a triangle  is symbol B.3.1, Caution (refer to accompanying
 documents), from ISO 3864: SAFETY COLOUR AND SAFETY SIGNS. 

Be aware of a small distinction here: the interpretation of Caution (refer 
to accompanying documents) comes from 61010-1, not ISO 3864, which merely 
calls the symbol General warning, caution, risk of danger. That is, the 
official meaning assigned to the symbol in 3864 does NOT include the concept 
of refering to separate documents.

Mike Sherman
FSI International

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Risk assessment

2000-12-08 Thread MikSherman

Deep within a very interesting paper on EMC and Functional Safety by the 
IEE at

http://www.iee.org.uk/PAB/EMC/core.htm

in section 13.5 (page 49 on my copy) are pretty classic descriptions of 
probability and severity. These probably are descendents of MILSTD1442, and 
are probably also treated in EN1050.

By the way, I ran across this when it was mentioned at www.conformity.com, a 
quite useful site, and one at which you can sign up for a weekly email of 
conformity issues.

Mike Sherman
FSI International

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Rechargeable Batteries

2000-11-27 Thread MikSherman

In a message dated 11/23/2000 5:50:28 PM Central Standard Time, 
cdup...@cs.com writes:

 The short circuit thing is interesting.  My son has a radio controlled car 
 with a 7.2V NiCad battery pack.  The short circuit current was enough to 
melt 
 the PVC insulation on the battery wires, 1.5mm^2, and I measured it 
 subsequently at 82Amps.  You could probably start a European car with one of 
 those! 

A local store had a fire 5 years ago that they say was traced to a 
rechargeable hand drill battery in a bin for recycled batteries. I believe 
that 12V batteries were commone then; now I understand how it could have 
started a fire!

Mike Sherman
FSI International

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



Re: Concrete as an insulator???

1999-08-23 Thread MikSherman

Properly poured and cured concrete can still pass water. This is why the 
Uniform Building Code requires pressure-treated wood for wood in contact with 
basement floors, unless a separate barrier (i.e., in addition to the 
concrete) has been installed.

Mike Sherman
FSI International

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).



Re: White neutrals in Europe

1999-04-19 Thread MikSherman
The referenced NFPA 70 section 400-22c seems to apply only to appliances with 
jacketed cords. What about industrial equipment?

Mike Sherman
FSI International


In a message dated 4/19/1999 1:32:11 PM Central Daylight Time, 
robe...@ma.ultranet.com writes:

 About twenty years ago, the a group in the cable and computer industries
 gathered together all the colors used worldwide for conductor identification 
and
 tried to come up with a worldwide compromise. The light blue(neutral), brown
 (phase), and green/yellow (earth) were the best choice to avoid miswiring
 somewhere in the world. The US NEC was changed specifically to clarify this
 compromise (ref.  NFPA 70 clause 400-22c), taking light blue as close to 
white
 or gray.
 
 You can probably get away with sending the US customary colors (white, black,
 green) to some countries, but you will have to specifically check codes in 
each
 case. Don't think an answer from one European country will answer for all of
 Europe. Note: NFPA is a US originated organization working to promote itself
 internationally, but does not apply to Europe except in some specific cases 
of
 harmonization. The absence of a European Norm does not mean no laws apply.
 National or local laws would be applicable.
 
 Since we have a well researched solution, why fight it? Misunderstandings 
when
 it comes to wiring power cords can be lethal, a terrible price to pay for
 getting away with something less.
 
 Bob Johnson
 
 Crane, Lauren wrote:
 
   Is it acceptable to ship equipment to Europe with neutral conductors 
(hook
   up wire) that is white, particularly if the ends are marked with the
   letter 'N' ?
  
   It seems to me that this would be acceptable to both the Machinery
   Directive and the Low Voltage Directive. Neither of these directives have
   a requirement for wire color in their Essential Requirements.
  
   Marking neutrals in this manner conforms to NFPA-79, an appropriate,
   though US National, design standard for large semiconductor manufacturing
   equipment.
  
   Conforming to NFPA-79, I think, demonstrates adequately addressing
   electrical hazards to the extent of the concern of the Machinery 
Directive
   and Low Voltage Directive
  
   EN 60204 requires that neutrals be colored light blue ONLY IF COLOR IS
   USED TO IDENTIFY THEM. Quoting section 15.2.3 Where a circuit includes a
   neutral conductor identified by colour, the colour shall be light
   blue
  
   Note that the definitions section of EN 60204 (3.38) says that the 
neutral
   conductor is assigned the symbol 'N'.
  
   This is echoed in EN60439 Specification for Low voltage switch gear and
   control gear assemblies Part 1. Specification for type-tested and
   partially type-tested assemblies. section 7.6.5.2 which says in part 
Any
   neutral conductor of the main circuit should be readily distinguishable 
by
   shape, location, marking or colour...
  
   I would be interested to know if anyone has experiences with this issue.
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
   Lauren Crane
   Eaton Corporation
  
   lcr...@bev.etn.com
  


-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


Re: General Product Safety Directive

1999-03-29 Thread MikSherman
Try looking for Directive 85/374. As I recall, it applies to consumer
products.

Mike Sherman
FSI International
msher...@fsi-intl.com

-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).


Title for ENV 50204?

1998-07-21 Thread MikSherman
Quick question: what's the title/subject matter of ENV 50204?

thanks!
Mike Sherman
FSI International
miksher...@aol.com
or
msher...@fsi-intl.com


CBEMA Curve and IEEE 446 Orange Book

1998-03-17 Thread MikSherman
Quick quiz time: What does CBEMA stand for on the voltage sag and drop-out
curves, such as in the IEEE 446 orange book and other places?

Someone here at work asked me, and I'm stumped!

thanks!
Mike Sherman
FSI International
miksher...@aol.com


Re: transportation environmental condition

1998-03-10 Thread MikSherman
In a message dated 98-03-09 15:13:04 EST, dmck...@paragon-networks.com writes:

 Ok, this is rather old but the atmosphere is still 
 pretty much the same.  Assuming your standing at 
 sea level with 1 atmosphere pressure and +15C temp 
 and you start to rise in altitude, you'll have 
 roughly dependent upon alot of other factors ... 
 
 AltitudeTemperature Pressure   Approx Ratio of 
  (feet) F   Clb/ft^2   Altitude to sea level
 
 0   +  59+ 15   2.12 x 10^3  0 
20,000   -  12- 24   9.73 x 10^2 1/2 
40,000   -  70- 57   3.93 x 10^2 1/5  
60,000   -  70- 57   1.51 x 10^2 1/10
80,000   -  70- 57   5.81 x 10   1/50
   100,000   -  41- 41   2.31 x 10   1/100
 
 Assuming that you won't be shipping anything in an 
 unpressurized cabin much above 60,000 ft, 
 then testing for 
 
   temp = -70C, 
   pressure = (14.7 lb/sq.in.)/10 = 1.47 lb/sq.in. 
 
 should do it. 
 
 Speaking of humidity at temperatures near or below 
 freezing doesn't really mean anything. 
 
 --
  From: regr...@esaote.com
  To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
  Subject: transportation environmental condition
  Date: Monday, March 09, 1998 8:43 AM
  
  Hello all!
  Does anybody know the foreseeable environmental condition (temperature,
  humidity, pressure) you have during transportation of a device on a
 plane?
  
  Of course they depend on flight heigth, but is it possible to get rough,
  common-sense data for the design of packaging?
  
  Many thanks
  Massimo
  
  ---
  ESAOTE S.p.A. Massimo Polignano
  Research  Product Development   Regulatory Affairs
  Via di Caciolle,15   tel:+39.55.4229402
  I- 50127 Florencefax:+39.55.4223305
 e-mail: regr...@esaote.com
  
  
If you're speaking of CARGO compartment conditions, I believe that those are
pressurized and heated to about 50 degrees F on passenger planes (otherwise, I
suspect, passengers would get upset about their freeze-dried pets and
luggage). 

Does anyone know of any standard conditions for cargo compartments?

Mike Sherman
FSI International
msher...@fsi-intl.com
[miksher...@aol.com]


Re: Do you need a license

1998-01-06 Thread MikSherman
In a message dated 98-01-06 04:09:12 EST, phil_f...@uk.xyratex.com writes:

 Paul Rampelbergh wrote:
  
  Is there a need to have a license to posses and operate EMC
  measurement tools?
  
 In the UK... none that I know of.
 -- 
 Regards,
 Phil Ford   phil_f...@uk.xyratex.com
 tel +44 (0)1705 443255fax +44 (0)1705 499315
 Xyratex, Langstone Road, Havant, PO9 1SA, United Kingdom
 http://www.xyratex.com/
  

Be careful here if you're doing in situ RF immunity tests, i.e., outside of
an anechoic chamber or other Faraday cage. In the USA, at least, this can get
you into frequencies and powers that technically require licenses.

Mike Sherman
FSI International
miksher...@aol.com
(612) 361-8140