EMC requirements USA
Dear Group, In North America, are there any EMC testing and performance requirements specifically covering industrial process measuring equipment? Many thanks in anticipation of your replies. Ian Unwin * *Register now at www.servomex.com/zap.html * *for an opportunity to win a digital camera * * This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. This electronic message contains information from Servomex which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately. Activity and use of the Servomex E-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system may also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: emc_p...@symbol.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
RE: NEW EMC Standards
Dear Group I am on the point of specifying a new signal generator for in-house radiated immunity testing. Does anybody out there have a feel for where the upper test frequency limit is likely to go for industrial instruments covered by EN 61326 and similar? Is it likely to remain at 1 GHz, or is an extension to 2 GHz, or even higher seen on the far and distant horizon? Thanks for your help Ian Unwin This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. This electronic message contains information from Servomex which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately. Activity and use of the Servomex E-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system may also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: emc_p...@symbol.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
US Product Safety Standards
Dear Group, We manufacture gas monitoring equipment for process plant and lab use. Historically, before being marketed in the US the non hazardous area product versions have been submitted for electrical safety assessment under either UL 61010A-1 or FM3810. Can anyone advise me what the differences are (if any) between these two standards and also when one would be applied in preference to the other? Many thanks Ian Unwin Lead Engineer Servomex Group Limited This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. This electronic message contains information from Servomex which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately. Activity and use of the Servomex E-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system may also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
RE: MRA US-EU: Sectoral Annex Safety suspended
Dear Group, Having read the document given, can anybody explain what it means? As an instrument manufacturer selling products into both the US and EU do I need to panic over this, or can I ignore it and sleep peacefully in my bed at nights? Regards Ian D Unwin Servomex Group Limited This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. This electronic message contains information from Servomex which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately. Activity and use of the Servomex E-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system may also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
'DOW' of standards
Dear Group, The OJ for the LVD (page C317/73) gives 1.1.2004 as being the date beyond which IEC 61010-1:1990/A2:1995 can no longer be used to presume conformance with the requirements of this Directive. After this date, can equipment previously assessed to this standard still be marketed without reassessment to the new standard (IEC 61010-1:2001)? If so, until when? Between 1.4.2001 (the 'dow' of IEC 61010-1:1990+A1:1992 (Modified)) and 1.1.2004 (the dow of IEC 61010-1:1990/A2:1995), can either IEC 61010-1:1990/A2:1995 or IEC 61010-1:2001 be used to presume conformance with the requirements of LVD? Apologies if the answers to the above have been covered before and are thus locked up in the group's archives. Ian Unwin Servomex Group Limited This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. This electronic message contains information from Servomex which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately. Activity and use of the Servomex E-mail system is monitored to secure its effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using this system may also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
Re: Wee Directive
Ian,
As a process equipment manufacturer we are members of GAMBICA
(www.gambica.org.uk), a UK trade association covering automation,
instrumentation and control technologies. This group regularly provides us
with valuable information on directives such as WEE, and acts as a point of
contact for answering any queries we may have.
Regards
Ian Unwin
Lead Engineer
Servomex Group Limited
"White, Ian" @majordomo.ieee.org on 23/01/2003
08:34:44
Please respond to "White, Ian"
Sent by:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
To:"IEEE Forum (E-mail)"
cc:
Subject:Wee Directive
Hi everybody
The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive in Annex 1B lists
the products covered by the Directive. Most of the products are consumer
type products. As a company which produces industrial control equipment we
need need to be sure we are covered before we proceed. We do not want to
waste time and money.
Our reading is we come under the Directive but would like the council of
informed legal opinion. Can any one suggest anybody or organisation apart
>from the Department of Trade and Industry who did not want to be tied down
to giving one.
Thanks
Ian White
(Project Engineer - Spirax Sarco Ltd, UK)
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service.
This electronic message contains information from Servomex which may be
privileged or confidential.
The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named above.
If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited.
If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us
immediately.
Activity and use of the Servomex E-mail system is monitored to secure its
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications
using this system may also be monitored and may be
recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business
purposes.
N??j２^ A?﹍#諢???y¥
^y?竹\v+ 瞄"▕b組b?h獐 ny
��嗓 0{by蝔?魽癹?竹\? jw ?
晏忷肋?vf??j:+v?m�
�"?^?瑎{.n??刜聒h?它vf??b累?)漜稄?閼修字?r 宙?&
徊 璆u眽z?眴絡ah?%疚??麇�
�扒r咨菢z???z誠i
��?Y^l脾h紲?y芙?煪拓�
�咬???釜雁i?y瘭腆??? 倚&?brJ'n?望听傂汻?x%
