Re: Australian compliance to ARE: creepage v breakdown voltage

2002-03-19 Thread Jon Curtis
Yes, NATA has informed us that the RTA list is being updated soon. 
Curtis-Straus (USA) is also accredited to perform testing to AS/ACIF S043.


Jon Curtis

Kevin Richardson wrote:


Kristiaan,

 

Equipment which falls under TLN Category A50 is required to comply 
with ACA TS001:1997 (Compliance Level 3) and AS/ACIF S043 - Parts 1, 2 
& 3 as appropriate (Compliance Level 3 from 1 Jan 02).  You said 
"deemed to comply" but I presume you mean need to comply so this is 
correct.


 

Compliance Level 3 does indeed require test reports be from an 
Recognised Testing Authority (RTA). 

Compliance Level 3 requirements are spelt out in the TLN Section 
4.6(1) and 4.6(2). 

Yes there are other options to compliance with Compliance Level 3 
instead of a test report from an RTA as listed in 4.6(2).


NOTE:  4.6.(2)(c) I do not think could be applied as there is no 
reason a Category A50 device could not be tested in a lab.  In 
addition, 4.6(2)(d), 4.6(2)(e), 4.6.(2)(f) and 4.6(2)(g) do not apply 
to Category A50 equipment.


 


The only compliance options therefore for a Category A50 device would be:

1.  a test report from an RTA; or

2.  a written statement from a certification body.

 

 

The NATA RTA listing is not up-to-date even though the last revision 
was dated 7 Mar 02.


 

Apart from BABT TUV Product Services lab in Santa Clara, USA, there 
are at least 2 other labs that I am aware of accredited to S043:


a)  Austest (Sydney, Australia); and

b)  Comtest (Melb, Australia)

 

Details for these labs can be found in the RTA listing on the NATA web 
site you referenced.


 


Best regards,
Kevin Richardson

Stanimore Pty Limited
Compliance Advice & Solutions for Technology (including Australian 
Agent Services)

(Legislation/Regulations/Standards)
Ph:   02-4329-4070   (Int'l: +61-2-4329-4070)
Fax:  02-4328-5639   (Int'l: +61-2-4328-5639)
Mobile:  04-1224-1620   (Int'l: +61-4-1224-1620)
Email:k...@compuserve.com
 (kevin.richard...@ieee.org - alternate email)

The material transmitted in this message or contained in attachments 
to this message may contain confidential and/or privileged material 
and is intended only for the addressee. Any use of or reliance upon 
this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is 
prohibited. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and 
destroy any copies of the material immediately.


-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org 
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of 
kristiaan.carpent...@alcatel.be

Sent: Saturday, 16 March 2002 3:12 AM
To: Emc-Pstc Post
Subject: Australian compliance to ARE: creepage v breakdown voltage


Hello,

According to the latest version of the Telecommunication Labelling 
Notice 2001, products in the Category A50 are deemed to comply with 
ACA TS-001-1997 and AS/ACIF S043-2001. No problem for TS-001, but S043 
needs Compliance level 3 only since January 1rst 2002.
The general approach is that testing for S043 must be done by a 
Recognised Testing Authority.
After verifying the latest list of RTA´s 
http://www.nata.asn.au/downloads/rtalist.pdf of March 7th, only 1 lab 
seems to be listed as RTA and it is not even located in Australia, but 
in the US.
From my reading of the Labelling Notice, Schedule 3 seems to give 
however other possibilities to comply, like a Certification or 
Competent body.

Any-one can shed some light on this issue?

Regards,
Kris Carpentier



--
Jon D. Curtis, P.E.

Director of Engineering
Curtis-Straus LLC NRTL TCB

One Stop Laboratory for NEBS, EMC, 
Product Safety, and Telecom Testing.

527 Great Road
Littleton, MA 01460 USA
Voice 978-486-8880  Fax 978-486-8828
email: jcur...@curtis-straus.com
WWW.CURTIS-STRAUS.COM




RE: Australian compliance to ARE: creepage v breakdown voltage

2002-03-19 Thread Kevin Richardson
Kristiaan,

Equipment which falls under TLN Category A50 is required to comply with ACA
TS001:1997 (Compliance Level 3) and AS/ACIF S043 - Parts 1, 2 & 3 as
appropriate (Compliance Level 3 from 1 Jan 02).  You said "deemed to comply"
but I presume you mean need to comply so this is correct.

Compliance Level 3 does indeed require test reports be from an Recognised
Testing Authority (RTA).
Compliance Level 3 requirements are spelt out in the TLN Section 4.6(1) and
4.6(2).
Yes there are other options to compliance with Compliance Level 3 instead of
a test report from an RTA as listed in 4.6(2).
NOTE:  4.6.(2)(c) I do not think could be applied as there is no reason a
Category A50 device could not be tested in a lab.  In addition, 4.6(2)(d),
4.6(2)(e), 4.6.(2)(f) and 4.6(2)(g) do not apply to Category A50 equipment.

The only compliance options therefore for a Category A50 device would be:
1.  a test report from an RTA; or
2.  a written statement from a certification body.


The NATA RTA listing is not up-to-date even though the last revision was
dated 7 Mar 02.

Apart from BABT TUV Product Services lab in Santa Clara, USA, there are at
least 2 other labs that I am aware of accredited to S043:
a)  Austest (Sydney, Australia); and
b)  Comtest (Melb, Australia)

Details for these labs can be found in the RTA listing on the NATA web site
you referenced.

Best regards,
Kevin Richardson

Stanimore Pty Limited
Compliance Advice & Solutions for Technology (including Australian Agent
Services)
(Legislation/Regulations/Standards)
Ph:   02-4329-4070   (Int'l: +61-2-4329-4070)
Fax:  02-4328-5639   (Int'l: +61-2-4328-5639)
Mobile:  04-1224-1620   (Int'l: +61-4-1224-1620)
Email:k...@compuserve.com
 (kevin.richard...@ieee.org - alternate email)

The material transmitted in this message or contained in attachments to this
message may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended
only for the addressee. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons
or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you receive this in
error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material
immediately.

-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
kristiaan.carpent...@alcatel.be
Sent: Saturday, 16 March 2002 3:12 AM
To: Emc-Pstc Post
Subject: Australian compliance to ARE: creepage v breakdown voltage



Hello,

According to the latest version of the Telecommunication Labelling Notice
2001, products in the Category A50 are deemed to comply with ACA TS-001-1997
and AS/ACIF S043-2001. No problem for TS-001, but S043 needs Compliance
level 3 only since January 1rst 2002.
The general approach is that testing for S043 must be done by a Recognised
Testing Authority.
After verifying the latest list of RTA´s
http://www.nata.asn.au/downloads/rtalist.pdf of March 7th, only 1 lab seems
to be listed as RTA and it is not even located in Australia, but in the US.
>From my reading of the Labelling Notice, Schedule 3 seems to give however
other possibilities to comply, like a Certification or Competent body.
Any-one can shed some light on this issue?

Regards,
Kris Carpentier


Australian compliance to ARE: creepage v breakdown voltage

2002-03-15 Thread Kristiaan . Carpentier
Hello,

According to the latest version of the Telecommunication Labelling Notice 
2001, products in the Category A50 are deemed to comply with ACA 
TS-001-1997 and AS/ACIF S043-2001. No problem for TS-001, but S043 needs 
Compliance level 3 only since January 1rst 2002.
The general approach is that testing for S043 must be done by a Recognised 
Testing Authority.
After verifying the latest list of RTA´s 
http://www.nata.asn.au/downloads/rtalist.pdf of March 7th, only 1 lab seems to 
be listed as RTA and it is not even 
located in Australia, but in the US.
>From my reading of the Labelling Notice, Schedule 3 seems to give however 
other possibilities to comply, like a Certification or Competent body.
Any-one can shed some light on this issue? 

Regards,
Kris Carpentier