RE: 61326-1

2001-02-19 Thread Brian Harlowe

Brian
I would recommend you get a copy of the standard including the 1999
amendment. It has a lot of good stuff in it including allowing you to chose
the pass/Fail criteria on the immunity testing. Also a lot of the pass
levels have been relaxed compared to the old general ISM Standards

Brian Harlowe
Thermo V.G. Scientific
Tel +44 (0)1342 327211
Fax +44 (0)1342 315074

> -Original Message-
> From: Brian O'Connell 
> Sent: 16 February 2001 17:58
> To:   emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject:  61326-1
> 
> 
> Good people of the group:
> 
> Are requirements in IEC61326-1 (EMC for lab instruments) similiar
> to/same/much different than CISPR11/16 and/or the "good stuff" in
> 61000-3-x/-4-x ??
> 
> If so, is the "level of difference" enough such that I will have have to
> buy
> (yet) another standard?
> 
> thanx much,
> Brian O'Connell
> Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.
> 
> 
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
>  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
> 

---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org



RE: 61326-1

2001-02-18 Thread Jon Griver

Brian,

IEC61326 (or EN61326, which you need for EMC Directive compliance) 'calls
out' the various test standards, e.g. CISPR 11, IEC 61000-4-X, IEC
61000-3-X, and supplies the actual levels at which these standards are to be
used.

To my mind, if your product falls within the scope of this standard, and you
are going to use it to claim compliance to the EMC Directive, then you must
have it. In fact, if your company is ISO 9000 approved, then your auditor
should not only check that you hold all standards relevant to your product,
but also that you have a mechanism in place to ensure that you are using the
most updated version.

Best Wishes,

Jon Griver
Medson Ltd.
VP Quality Assurance

>
> Good people of the group:
>
> Are requirements in IEC61326-1 (EMC for lab instruments) similiar
> to/same/much different than CISPR11/16 and/or the "good stuff" in
> 61000-3-x/-4-x ??
>
> If so, is the "level of difference" enough such that I will have
> have to buy
> (yet) another standard?
>
> thanx much,
> Brian O'Connell
> Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.
>
>
> ---
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>  majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>  unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>  Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
>  Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>  Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org
>
>
>


---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
 majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
 unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Jim Bacher:  jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
 Michael Garretson:pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
 Richard Nute:   ri...@ieee.org