Re: [PSES] input current rating

2015-05-17 Thread Rich Nute
Dear Bostjan:


One of the uses of current rating on equipment is to determine that the 
equipment, with all of the other equipment, would not overload the mains 
circuit.  If the actual current exceeds the marked current, then the equipment, 
with all of the other equipment, can overload the mains but there is no means 
to identify the culprit equipment.

Note, however, that there is no limit on lower current than rated current.  I 
suspect this is because much equipment has an idle mode during which the input 
current is minimum.  


Best regards,
Rich

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas sdoug...@ieee.org
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] input current rating

2015-05-17 Thread John Woodgate
In message fe454ecafb4cfe4a89dd78f78ef9e38fa03...@ser-ex01.siq.si, 
dated Sun, 17 May 2015, =?iso-8859-2?Q?Bo=B9tjan_Glavi=E8?= 
bostjan.gla...@siq.si writes:


Does anyone know what is behind the requirement, that measured input 
current of the unit can exceed the rated current by 10%? Where this 10% 
come from?


It's an estimate of the variation in actual input current between 
samples, due to component tolerances. Why 10 %? It's based on experience 
that no-one complains that the allowance is neither insufficient or too 
large.

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas sdoug...@ieee.org
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] input current rating

2015-05-17 Thread John Woodgate
In message fe454ecafb4cfe4a89dd78f78ef9e38fa03...@ser-ex01.siq.si, 
dated Sun, 17 May 2015, =?utf-8?B?Qm/FoXRqYW4gR2xhdmnEjQ==?= 
bostjan.gla...@siq.si writes:


Thank you. But for example if I measure 10% more than rated, it is 
still pass by the standard and I test only one sample. So in real 
production it can be more than 110% considering tolerances.


 
'Rated' is the value stated by the manufacturer. So if you measure 110% 
of 'rated' on your one sample, you have set the 'rated' value too low.

--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas sdoug...@ieee.org
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] input current rating

2015-05-16 Thread IBM Ken
Hi Bostjan!
I had heard (and perhaps this is apocryphal) that the 10% was intended to
allow for manufacturing tolerances in the final product.  I don't know how
the number was arrived at.

-Ken

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Boštjan Glavič bostjan.gla...@siq.si
wrote:

  Dear experts,



 Does anyone know what is behind the requirement, that measured input
 current of the unit can exceed the rated current by 10%? Where this 10%
 come from?



 Best regards,

 Bostjan






  -
 

 This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
 discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to LT;
 emc-p...@ieee.orgGT;

 All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
 http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

 Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
 http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in
 well-used formats), large files, etc.

 Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
 Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to
 unsubscribe) http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
 List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

 For help, send mail to the list administrators:
 Scott Douglas LT;sdoug...@ieee.orgGT;
 Mike Cantwell LT;mcantw...@ieee.orgGT;

 For policy questions, send mail to:
 Jim Bacher LT;j.bac...@ieee.orgGT;
 David Heald LT;dhe...@gmail.comGT;


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas sdoug...@ieee.org
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com


Re: [PSES] input current rating

2015-05-16 Thread Boštjan Glavič
Hi Ken,

Thank you. But for example if I measure 10% more than rated, it is still pass 
by the standard and I test only one sample. So in real production it can be 
more than 110% considering tolerances.

Best regards,
Bostjan

From: IBM Ken [mailto:ibm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 6:24 AM
To: Boštjan Glavič
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] input current rating

Hi Bostjan!
I had heard (and perhaps this is apocryphal) that the 10% was intended to allow 
for manufacturing tolerances in the final product.  I don't know how the number 
was arrived at.

-Ken

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Boštjan Glavič 
bostjan.gla...@siq.simailto:bostjan.gla...@siq.si wrote:
Dear experts,

Does anyone know what is behind the requirement, that measured input current of 
the unit can exceed the rated current by 10%? Where this 10% come from?

Best regards,
Bostjan



-


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
LT;emc-p...@ieee.orgmailto:emc-p...@ieee.orgGT;

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas LT;sdoug...@ieee.orgmailto:sdoug...@ieee.orgGT;
Mike Cantwell LT;mcantw...@ieee.orgmailto:mcantw...@ieee.orgGT;

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher LT;j.bac...@ieee.orgmailto:j.bac...@ieee.orgGT;
David Heald LT;dhe...@gmail.commailto:dhe...@gmail.comGT;


-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
emc-p...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas sdoug...@ieee.org
Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  j.bac...@ieee.org
David Heald: dhe...@gmail.com