Tested to UL requirements is insufficient. The product needs to be UL tested and UL listed.
-----Original Message----- From: sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com <sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com> To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail) <emc-p...@ieee.org> List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Friday, August 06, 1999 5:06 AM Subject: Labelling - AC/DC Power adapter > > > >Hi, > >Would like to seek some advise/opinion on the followings : > >For AC/DC power adapter tested to UL1950(under class II insulation), what should >the labelling on the adapter have : > >a) "Cord connected Class II Power Units" wording only >b) "Cord connected Class II Power Units" wording and double insulation sign >c) Double insulation sign only > >Would there be any liabilities issue when an AC/DC adapter, tested under UL1310, >is bundled with I.T.E product? >Is this a violation? > >Our ITE product, that bundle in this adapter for supply, is a SELV device. With >adapter tested to UL1310, can we claims that our end product is still safe >without additional testing? > >Thanks in advance ! >Jess > > > >--------- >This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. >To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org >with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the >quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, >jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or >roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). > > --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
