Re: [-empyre-] "Save As: Social Memory"

[Jussi Parikka]

--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi

Just briefly, and a bit out of context (apologies, I am not following the
main discussion on the list, was just drawn in by Jon now);



Thanks to Ebru for drawing attention to the June-event we organised. In
short, it was supposed to be a bit different and focused more tightly on
questions of software, art and archiving. We wanted to showcase innovative
practices, such as ones having to do with Erkki Kurenniemi-archives. Our
aim was to think through some practical and ontological questions of
software dynamics from the perspective of the archival questions. Then Gezi
happened, and it felt that we somehow needed to recontextualise the event
partly – in other words, it become less about the long term archival
question but how the social is being reframed and perhaps sustained in the
activist moment which tied up a range of cultural techniques and media
platforms together.



As Jon point outs, any focus on individual objects that circulate in
network space is not adequate in order to understand the wider dynamics in
which things unfold – the affective environment coupled to the
technological space of communication. Indeed, any question of file formats
has to do with how technology itself is already at the heart of any
question of memory/archive/the social (they never were, I would say,
separated) but should not be isolated from the wider set of relations.



I think and agree there is a lot to be said for the necessity of methods
such as oral history - still. The “quick and dirty” usability of the
proprietary network space is also related to the uselessness of it as an
archival space. I think that a lot of the things we discussed in June had
also to do with questions of in what institutional space this archiving
could take place. Methods such as oral history might be able to take into
account the lived relations of affect that tied up engagement with the
online discussions together with the streets, so to speak. Besides
following up on the threads of algorithmic events (perhaps in a
microhistorical way even…) one should be able to follow up on the
“metadata” having to do with uses and abuses of twitter hashtags, the pace
and reactions to unfolding of events, and various other contexts of
intensity of the engagement.





Just as an aside, in relation to architecture, an archival project of a
sort that took place:



http://www.dezeen.com/2013/06/24/occupygezi-architecture-by-architecture-for-all/



And similarly various narrative formulations through on-going documentary
etc. projects.



Anyway, I guess for me two poles to the question;



How is the archival conditioned by the technical aspects of contemporary
technical media? This relates to the way in which scholars like Ernst argue
that the technical media context of the archival points to a different set
of questions/concepts that we inherit from traditional memory studies.
Hence his insistence on notions such as microtemporal/time-critical for
instance (cf.
http://jussiparikka.net/2013/03/18/ernst-on-microtemporality-a-mini-interview/
)



But then again, the aspects of social memory triggered by the events go
deep on another level too – affective and activist. Traditional questions
of preservation were perhaps less urgent than the idea of how future
memories entangle with the on-going activism; how to sustain the moment ,
as well as engage with these questions in a situation which is defined by
blatant censorship and a distrust of any centralised governmental
organisation who could not be trusted to preserve the counter-memory of the
activists. Indeed, this is where paradoxically the probably meticulous work
of “archiving” the activists was more of a police-operation of following up
the “dubious” elements, tagging them, secret arrests, databases of
suspects, etc. Indeed, we were interested in carving out how the issue of
memory unfolds from in-situ, the situation itself. Hence a lot of the
discussion was also on other themes, both related to curation, software art
as well as software, technology and activism.



Sorry for the fragmented post and if it misses the core of the discussion,

Best wishes

Jussi

ps. Jon and Richard, the forthcoming book of yours is on my "read
immediately"-list!

pps. for those interested, my June talk is online here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-sJoJ65rXA


-- 
Dr Jussi Parikka
Reader in Media & Design
Winchester School of Art (University of Southampton)
Docent in Digital Culture Theory, University of Turku (Finland)

http://jussiparikka.net
*Insect Media * --
Winner of the Anne Friedberg Award for Innovative Scholarship 2012 (SCMS)
*Media Archaeology * is
available from University of California Press
What is Media Archaeology?,
is available from Polity.
Digital Memory and the
Archive

Re: [-empyre-] "Save As: Social Memory"

[Jon Ippolito]

--empyre- soft-skinned space--Hi Jussi,

Thanks for the kind words about Re-collection; I hope it doesn't disappoint. I 
can promise a chapter that addresses this quandary raised in your panel:

On Dec 2, 2013, Jussi Parikka wrote:

> a situation which is defined by blatant censorship and a distrust of any 
> centralised governmental organisation who could not be trusted to preserve 
> the counter-memory of the activists. Indeed, this is where paradoxically the 
> probably meticulous work of “archiving” the activists was more of a 
> police-operation of following up the “dubious” elements, tagging them, secret 
> arrests, databases of suspects, etc.

Rick and I cite Diana Taylor's distinction between the written archive and the 
supposedly ephemeral "repertoire." Although Spanish and Portuguese colonists 
outlawed oral performance during the Conquest, sacred dancing, mask carving, 
and other indigenous methods of preservation survived the attempts by 
conquistadors and the church to stamp them out. We think books are archival, 
but they can be burned, while many core aspects of Native American culture 
somehow survived 500 years of invasion from a continent bent on genocide and 
armed with muskets and smallpox.

Can today's vibrant networked culture persevere by being re-performed in an 
analogous fashion, without leaving the NSA a trail of digital breadcrumbs to 
round up the netroots?

jon
___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre

Re: [-empyre-] "Save As: Social Memory"

[Jon Ippolito]

--empyre- soft-skinned space--Ebru's panel sounds intriguing. While I'm glad to see a renewed interest in 
preserving software (the Preserving Virtual Worlds consortium, NDIIPP), the 
preservation of *social* memory is often relegated to the margins in favor of a 
focus on supposedly archival file formats.

But especially when talking about the role of software in organizing and 
promoting social protest like the Gezi resistance, the dynamic of the social 
network seems much more valuable historically than the individual files shared 
on it. 

Take "Vine," Twitter's video step child--those seven-second videos you can take 
with your cell phone and then upload and share. It's fairly simple to preserve 
the files itself, and it wouldn't be hard to migrate them to some relatively 
well-known codec like MPEG4. They are short, so they don’t take up much storage 
space.

Unfortunately, the focus on file formats ignores Vine's networked nature: Vine 
clips shared over Twitter, hash tags that people use for discovering and 
promoting them. It's tied into the commercial apparatus, with Vine 
micro-trailers to promote a movie years before it comes out. Vine clips can 
stimulate activism. All of that is invisible and lost if all you do is save a 
bunch of MP4s on a hard drive. 

I'm curious whether the panelists proposed any strategies for preserving the 
social dynamic of participatory media--perhaps some drawn from the traditions 
of oral and performative culture.

BTW the relevance of these older paradigms for today's social memory is a core 
theme of the book Rick Rinehart and I are publishing this spring 
(Re-collection: Art, New Media, and Social Memory, http://re-collection.net).

jon

On Nov 27, 2013, at 8:00 PM, Ebru wrote:

> "Save As: Social Memory."
> - How can we preserve the software itself along with the content it
> generates?
> - In what way should we consider software itself as the creative archive,
> *arche*, of our digital culture?
> - What new archival practices does technology-based art and culture
> present?
> - How do software, social media, and network practices introduce a sphere
> of counter-representation which curate alternative narratives of the
> present?

___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre

[-empyre-] "Save As: Social Memory" and "Cacophony"

[Ebru Yetiskin]

--empyre- soft-skinned space--Dear All,

As one of the invited discussants of November's topic,
"Documenting Digital Artivism", firstly, let me thank Selmin,
Patrick and Camilla for initiating this debate.

By experiencing Gezi Resistance, we, as curators, artists and academics
based in Istanbul, have faced with many challenging questions about
circulation,
media practices, memory and archives in the techno-political context.

One of the major events, which brought together three artists, Burak Arikan,
Ali Miharbi, Nicolas Malevé; a curator, Joasia Krysia; and an academic,
Jussi Parikka, was in the area of software art, archive, and media
archaeology:
"Save As: Social Memory."

These are the main discussion questions that were dealth with in this event:
- How can we preserve the software itself along with the content it
generates?
- In what way should we consider software itself as the creative archive,
*arche*, of our digital culture?
- What new archival practices does technology-based art and culture
present?
- How do software, social media, and network practices introduce a sphere
of counter-representation which curate alternative narratives of the
present?

In this event,  the topics of archiving the present as we live, algorithmic
curating in crisis, critical collective intelligence, and language of
technology as a thinking tool were in focus.

For those who are interested with these issues, here is the link, where you
can find more info:
http://burak-arikan.com/saveas-socialmemory/#program
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-sJoJ65rXA

Here is my article after the event: "Farklı Kaydet: Yeni Medya, Toplumsal
Bellekler ve Başka
Gelecekler"(in
Turkish).

Within a few days, I also would like to share with you the conceptual
discussion of the video exhibition that I am curating, entitled
"Cacophony", which will be launched tomorrow at Acikekran New Media Art
Gallery in Istanbul.
https://vimeo.com/80209965

Best,

-- 
*Ebru YETISKIN*
*Phd, Sociology*

*Lecturer / Art Critic *

Istanbul Technical University
Institute of Social Sciences
Taskisla Campus
34437 Taksim - Istanbul

http://www.akademi.itu.edu.tr/yetiskin/
___
empyre forum
empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
http://www.subtle.net/empyre