Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method

2011-03-30 Thread Stephen McCann 
Alan,

Q1: Yes
Q2: FASTv2

Kind regards

Stephen McCann
Research in Motion

On 30 March 2011 13:29, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
  For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
 the following consensus call:

 Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method?

  Please indicate Yes or No.

 Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is Yes, please indicate
 support for one of the two proposed methods:

        FASTv2
 or
        EAP-Team

  Alan DeKok.
  EMU Co-Chair
 ___
 Emu mailing list
 Emu@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method

2011-03-30 Thread Stephen Hanna 
Alan,

Could you set a deadline for these comments?

Thanks,

Steve

 -Original Message-
 From: emu-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:emu-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
 Alan DeKok
 Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 8:30 AM
 To: emu@ietf.org
 Subject: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method
 
   For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer
 the following consensus call:
 
 Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled
 method?
 
   Please indicate Yes or No.
 
 Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is Yes, please indicate
 support for one of the two proposed methods:
 
   FASTv2
 or
   EAP-Team
 
   Alan DeKok.
   EMU Co-Chair
 ___
 Emu mailing list
 Emu@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu