Re: [Enigmail] Windows 10, Enigmail 1.9.4, Thunderbird 45.2.0, GnuPG 2.1.14

2016-07-27 Thread Samir Nassar
On 27.07.2016 11:31, Samir Nassar wrote:
> On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 08:28 +0200, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> Enigmail 1.9.4 is older than GnuPG 2.1.14. It does not know how to
> interpret some new messages introduced by GnuPG, and therefore fails
> to import the keys.

I did the following:

Remove GnuPG 2.1.14; Install GnuPG 2.1.13; Result: Same problems.
Remove GnuPG 2.1.13; Install GnuPG 2.1.12; Result: Works.

Given the timeline for the Enigmail and GnuPG "modern" releases we
find:

2016-05-04 : GnuPG 2.1.12
2016-06-03 : Enigmail 1.9.3
2016-06-16 : GnuPG 2.1.13
2016-07-04 : Enigmail 1.9.4
2016-07-14 : GnuPG 2.1.14

I didn't go through testing the individual steps of testing the import
and export functions of Enigmail as GnuPG and Enigmail were rolling out
since may and I should have.

Is there an a pre-release announcement mailing list or notification that
I can subscribe to run some quick tests?

GnuPG talks about GnuPG 2.1.x inconsistently: at time it is "modern" and
at times it is a "development release", but Enigmail 1.9 was announced
with GnuPG 2.1.x support and so should either offer the support or warn
people who are using GnuPG 2.1 that breakage can happen.

If it is the position of the Enigmail project that GnuPG is a
development branch then it would be a nice touch to have a note in the
Enigmail conf that tells the user that their version of GnuPG is not
completely supported.

As it stands, the documentation and the release notes provided by
Enigmail set users up for failure.

-- 
Samir Nassar
web:samirnassar.com
email:  sa...@samirnassar.com
PGP:pgp.samirnassar.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] Windows 10, Enigmail 1.9.4, Thunderbird 45.2.0, GnuPG 2.1.14

2016-07-27 Thread Samir Nassar
On Mi, 2016-07-27 at 08:28 +0200, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
Enigmail 1.9.4 is older than GnuPG 2.1.14. It does not know how to
interpret some new messages introduced by GnuPG, and therefore fails
to import the keys.



Thank you Patrick, 


In general, I recommend GnuPG 2.0.x for regular users. 2.1.x is the
current development version of GnuPG with sometimes major changes
(and errors) between each version.



I don't see this recommendation matched on the Enigmail website or the
GnuPG website.

If GnuPG 2.1.x is less supported by a particular Enigmail version, it
would be helpful to state so in future Enigmail changelogs. A note to
say that Enigmail 1.9.4 is known to work up to GnuPG 2.1.13 for example
would be of great help.

The Enigmail changelog[1] says "This version requires GnuPG 2.0.7 or
newer. GnuPG 1.4.x is not supported anymore." since version 1.9

The GnuPG website[2] says "2.1.14 is the modern version with support
for ECC and many other new features".

When I go to the download page on gnupg.org and follow the links, I see

links to GnuPG 2.1.14 for Windows, created by GnuPG, and OSX, created
by you.

1) https://www.enigmail.net/index.php/en/download/changelog
2) https://gnupg.org/

-- 
Samir Nassar
web:samirnassar.com
email:  sa...@samirnassar.com
PGP:pgp.samirnassar.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] separation from Mozilla

2015-12-03 Thread Samir Nassar
On Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:43:54 AM Mike Acker wrote:
> I was horrified to learn that T-Bird would switch to OpenPGP
> in order to comply with Mozilla's demand that all code be in JavaScript

This is not happening and I would encourage you to not post unverified 
information that is unhelpful to other users.

> if T-Bird is divested from Mozilla to become an independent open source
> project then the demand for JavaScript would be of no effect.

There is a big if there and the conclusion is in no way the only one.

-- 
Samir Nassar
Digital Security Trainer & Consultant
sa...@samirnassar.com
https://samirnassar.com


___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] Paste passphrase from clipboard into pinentry dialogbox

2015-03-29 Thread Samir Nassar
On Sunday, March 29, 2015 10:26:53 AM Anne Wilson wrote:
 Personally I prefer my
 password to be reference to a book - and you haven't a snowball in
 hell's chance of knowing which book or what reference to it :-)  I
 doubt if even my closest family would guess the book.

You might be wrong, you might be right, at most you are right for the 
situation you live in.

Part of the discussion happening here is about general principles that cover 
cases where the risk is assessed to be adversaries who are making trillion 
guesses per second.
 
Samir


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] Medium Term Plan for Dropping GnuPG 1.4.x Support

2015-02-04 Thread Samir Nassar
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 05:09:24 PM Faramir wrote:
   If I'm not wrong, gpg 1.4.16 had a security flaw so it's strange
 ubuntu has not upgraded to 1.4.17 or 1.4.18. But that flaw may have
 been too specific to be considered exploitable... it was something
 about denial of service.

Depending on the bug and how patchable it is, some distributions like Debian, 
and so Ubuntu, might apply patches to an existing version instead of pumping 
the version level.

Samir

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] Request: different position for signature message

2014-08-08 Thread Samir Nassar
On Friday, 2014-08-08 18:31:21 Alexander Buchner alexander.buch...@posteo.de 
wrote:
 are you aware of the possibility to delete mails by hitting the del-key?

I think Martin is raising a usability issue and not looking for a particular 
solution to deleting email.

Samir

-- 
Samir Nassar
sa...@samirnassar.com
https://samirnassar.com
PGP Fingerprint: EE76 B39E 0778 8F95 F796 B044 FE67 9A90 8E99 7AB2
Public Key: https://samirnassar.com/files/key.asc

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] kmail encrypted/signed message unverifiable in enigmail

2014-07-11 Thread Samir Nassar
On Friday, 2014-07-11 02:24:15 Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net 
wrote:
 It sounds like i need to go back to the original correspondent and
 clarify their configuration to see if i can replicate this with
 non-sensitive data.

from previous email:

 My other correspondent's mail header shows:

 User-Agent:
  KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

This old header might be valid because of how KMail was packaged in the 
ancient days and ways of KDE 4.8.x - I am not sure though.

Samir 

-- 
Samir Nassar
sa...@samirnassar.com
https://samirnassar.com
PGP Fingerprint: EE76 B39E 0778 8F95 F796 B044 FE67 9A90 8E99 7AB2
Public Key: https://samirnassar.com/files/key.asc

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net


Re: [Enigmail] kmail encrypted/signed message unverifiable in enigmail

2014-07-10 Thread Samir Nassar
On Thursday, 2014-07-10 17:53:52 Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net 
wrote:
 But i'm concerned because it seems like enigmail ought to be able to
 parse the kmail construction, at least if the top-level cleartext part
 is itself multipart/signed.

I am happy to help. I'm running KMail 4.13.2, is your reference to kmail 
1.13.7 perhaps KMail 4.13.7 ?

If you need a KMail person to send emails back and forth for testing, I am 
always happy to help.

Samir

-- 
Samir Nassar
sa...@samirnassar.com
https://samirnassar.com
PGP Fingerprint: EE76 B39E 0778 8F95 F796 B044 FE67 9A90 8E99 7AB2
Public Key: https://samirnassar.com/files/key.asc

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net