Re: [E-devel] Eterm startup error
* Richard Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have just installed Eterm-0.9.2-1.i386.rpm on SuSe 7.2. (In doing so, > I had to install utempter-0.5.2-5.i386.rpm and libast-0.4-1.i386.rpm first.) > > When I try to start Eterm, I get the following error: > > Eterm: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libEterm-0.9.2.so: > undefined symbol: spifopt_settings > > Does anyone know what is causing this; or, more helpfully, how to fix it? Install libast 0.5. 0.4 is older. term --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Re: E CVS: enotes fletch3k
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:14:52AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Enlightenment CVS committal > > Author : fletch3k > Project : misc > Module : enotes > > Dir : misc/enotes/src > > > Modified Files: > main.h notecmds.c notenum.c > > > Log Message: > RbdPngn Suggested that using . as the fontdir might be silly. So i changed it. >Thanks RbdPngn. Umm... misunderstanding here... My suggestion was not to assume that everyone has . in their PATH. -- | Nathan Ingersoll \\ Computer Systems & Network Coordinator | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]\\ http://www.ruralcenter.org| | http://ningerso.atmos.org/ \\ Minnesota Center for Rural Health| msg00281/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: enotes fletch3k
* Nathan Ingersoll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:14:52AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >wrote: > > Enlightenment CVS committal > > > > Author : fletch3k > > Project : misc > > Module : enotes > > > > Dir : misc/enotes/src > > > > > > Modified Files: > > main.h notecmds.c notenum.c > > > > > > Log Message: > > RbdPngn Suggested that using . as the fontdir might be silly. So i changed it. >Thanks RbdPngn. > > Umm... misunderstanding here... My suggestion was not to assume that everyone > has . in their PATH. Fletch, could you also change that "#define usage" string to something more along the lines of common practice, e.g., "USAGE_STRING"? The symbol "usage" in most C programs is commonly defined to be void usage(); and that way of defining it can be confusing. Also, naming any #define in lower-case technically goes against common practice, as it misleads experienced developers as to how it was defined. term --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
RE: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: enotes fletch3k
And from a security perspective, you shouldn't :) Kirby -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nathan Ingersoll Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: enotes fletch3k On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:14:52AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Enlightenment CVS committal > > Author : fletch3k > Project : misc > Module : enotes > > Dir : misc/enotes/src > > > Modified Files: > main.h notecmds.c notenum.c > > > Log Message: > RbdPngn Suggested that using . as the fontdir might be silly. So i > changed it. Thanks RbdPngn. Umm... misunderstanding here... My suggestion was not to assume that everyone has . in their PATH. -- | Nathan Ingersoll \\ Computer Systems & Network Coordinator | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]\\ http://www.ruralcenter.org| | http://ningerso.atmos.org/ \\ Minnesota Center for Rural Health| --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: enotes fletch3k
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:08:32 PST, "Kirby Kuehl (kkuehl)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > And from a security perspective, you shouldn't :) And maintainability too - ever had a script that sometimes worked and sometimes failed, just because a user had a file in a directory that shadowed a system command ('test' is a popular whoops) so it matters where they are cd'ed to? ;) msg00284/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature