Re: [E-devel] e16.6 configure script

[Jalle]

At 21:50 2003-07-14 +0200, Morten Nilsen wrote:
Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Monday, 14 July 2003, at 21:12:39 (+0200),
> Morten Nilsen wrote:
>
>> 1) ./configure
>> /usr/local/bin, complains that dox is not in /usr/local/enlightenment/bin
>
> I can't reproduce that here.  Most likely a problem on your end.
>
quite possible, that..

but still, is there really any reason not to allways have --with-fsstd?

As I see it, the people who want enlightenment into a separate folder,
still can do that with --prefix...
I think most ppl would be just as happy (or even totally unaware) if 
--with-fsstd was removed and the only option in this matter would be 
--prefix, since these options do _almost_ the same thing. However, I still 
don't think it SHOULD be removed!
Many of us use UNIX/Linux because we are sick and tired of being bullied 
around in an MS environment, where we are forced to do things the MS way, 
and  where the defaults are set and "options" do not exist. --with-fsstd 
and/or --prefix are "options", meaning you don't have to use them if you 
don't want to. But for me and many others, these options are one of the 
main reasons for using this system, so let's keep it that way: Flexible and 
optional!

Hmm... I didn't mean for this to get so philosophical, but I think you get 
the point, neither of these options are harmful, they just keep the system 
flexible!

/J

PS: BTW, did this issue come up because someone thought it to be hard to 
maintain two different options, or just because there was nothing else to 
discuss? If so, read the old article about the color of the shed from one 
of the FreeBSD lists. It applies anywhere, anytime!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#BIKESHED-PAINTING


Cheers,
--
Morten


---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Re: [E-devel] stacking problem w/pre4

[Jalle]

It only happens after I run mplayer (0.90).
This may not add anything, and it is definitely no solution, but anyways...
I have the same prob using mplayer(0.90 I belive). If I have a running 
video window, and open a "play file" window, it stacks under the video 
window (good thing) and cannot be raised by clicking the bar, only by 
setting the stacking to "normal" (bad thing, since you have to do it every 
time).

This problem does not occur when I use FluxBox (or any other WM for that 
matter), only E (0.16.5).

As I said, no solution... sorry!

Bye!
/Jalle 



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel