What was the reasoning behind this? This change is what broke the
parallel build. When I revert it there are no problems doing the build
in parallel.
A zero sized file seems perfectly legitimate for writing. It's
possible that make is touching the file prior to the execution of
edje_cc as a locking mechanism on the parallel build. I committed a
patch to only enforce the file size check in read mode.
On Nov 12, 2007 12:15 AM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : raster
Project : e17
Module : libs/eet
Dir : e17/libs/eet/src/lib
Modified Files:
eet_lib.c
Log Message:
refuse to handle a 0 sized file without an error
===
RCS file: /cvs/e/e17/libs/eet/src/lib/eet_lib.c,v
retrieving revision 1.80
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -3 -r1.80 -r1.81
--- eet_lib.c 25 Sep 2007 18:26:49 - 1.80
+++ eet_lib.c 12 Nov 2007 06:15:08 - 1.81
@@ -497,6 +497,10 @@
else
return NULL;
}
+ else if (file_stat.st_size == 0)
+ {
+ return NULL;
+ }
/* We found one */
if (ef (file_stat.st_mtime != ef-mtime))
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/
___
enlightenment-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-cvs
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
