Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-21 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:12 AM, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11/21/2012 07:26 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
  On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:30:42 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
  barbi...@profusion.mobi  said:
 
  Ideas:
 
  - About -  inside settings, doesn't need to be so highlighted as the
 main
  menu. I'd say rename settings so we can use it for more than just
 that,
  it's a place holder for other stuff of enlightenment.
 
  renaming it is not a good idea... where do people find settings them?
 settings
  is one of the better bits of the menu. changing it just because you wish
 to
  get rid of the enlightenment entry is overall becoming worse than better.
 
  - Restart/Exit E: again, this is just for E17 test, so bad for
 end-users.
  I've mentioned Xephyr but indeed you might forget to grab and the
 shortcut
  will go to outside E17 and problems will happen. What about doing it for
  Everything? Then you see where you'll type the action and it's clear.
 You
  can name them e-restart and e-exit commands.
 
  i'm sure not going to do all this work just to remove a menu, that to
 date has
  not caused any issues i know of. i've asked a few times now for real
 info on
  issues it's caused - real datapoints. but unless there is another viable
 and
  sane way of doing these things - they stay. doing some minor
 re-labelling is
  doable. maybe moving a menu item here and there, but now we're talking
 of work
  that REALLY doesn't need to be done - there are much more important
 things to
  do. :)
 
  In the mood of refactoring the menus... if we merge Enlightenment +
  Settings (maybe call it Enlightenment?), we can remove the Desktop
 from
 
  settings includes stuff unrelated to e at all - see the system and
 preferences
  tabs that pull in standard settings tools.
 
  main menu as it's not as useful (menu to change desktop is not that
 common,
  add/configure shelves and gadgets are more like configuration that you
 do
  once a year, show/hide windows can go under Windows main menu entry).
 
  so its in a submenu... that's why its in a submenu. its a single entry
 in the
  main menu for general desktop controls. if it was inside the main menu
 -
  i'd totally agree.
 
  please read up about the latest windows 8 criticisms. you're going the
 exact
  same direction. you're on a head-long run into trying to remove as much
 as you
  can, and in the process you hurt discoverability (and usability) and the
 people
  who don't know the key bindings etc. etc. etc. - everything even vaguely
 useful
  or used even a few times SHOULD be in a menu - even if it's not used
 much. in
  fact we currently have too FEW things in menus. we've removed way too
 much.
  people need to be able to find the thing they want without knowing magic
  gestures, invisible click regions, or obscure keybindings etc. - the
 main menu
  is just that. it's a central point of control that is very fast to find
 (start
  gadget or click anywhere on the desktop - probably one of the first
 things a
  person does when presented with a new blank wm/screen). this menu should
  provide a easy starting point for a user to discover more and access the
 things
  they need or want. preferably nothing should be more than 2 or 3
 clicks/jumps
  away (but reality is that we have so many options, features etc. that we
 just
  can't sensibly manage that without a menu-from-hell).
 
  i fully support the streamlining and improving of menus. agreed, but
 removing
  stuff is something that should be done only as a very last resort.
  re-organizing - sure, but at this stage i sure don't want to spend the
 time
  re-organizing the main menu. modules DEPEND on existing hook points to
 insert
  items - re-orgs affect all of those.
 
   As for Windows i dislike it and shouldn't be that useful... but
 the
  cleanup windows and the action to recover lost windows are indeed
  useful... but likely the DM should avoid losing the windows instead of
 add
  them to a menu? Anyway, this one i see more reasoning to keep.
 
  it happens that apps ask to place their windows off the screen - and e
 honors
  that. in the case of things like guake they legitimately want a window
 off the
  screen so they can slide it in (yes - i know. this is a hack, and should
 be
  part of the wm and quickaccess, but apps will persist in doing these
 things
  themselves). if you ignore such requests you then break such apps, so
 reality
  is... in order to not break some apps, windows can become lost - when
 apps try
  remember their position, and you changed resolution/monitors since
 (x11amp used
  to love doing this), and you had it bottom-right, and now it asks for a
  position off the screen.. and you can't get to the window. that menu item
  exists because of real world problems and we can try as we might - we
 either
  break app a or break app b. the menu is the solution to when things
 break. if
  we could actually modify the apps to ensure none of them do 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-21 Thread thomasg
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:12 AM, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11/21/2012 07:26 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
  On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:30:42 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
  barbi...@profusion.mobi  said:
 
  Ideas:
 
  - About -  inside settings, doesn't need to be so highlighted as the
 main
  menu. I'd say rename settings so we can use it for more than just
 that,
  it's a place holder for other stuff of enlightenment.
 
  renaming it is not a good idea... where do people find settings them?
 settings
  is one of the better bits of the menu. changing it just because you wish
 to
  get rid of the enlightenment entry is overall becoming worse than better.
 
  - Restart/Exit E: again, this is just for E17 test, so bad for
 end-users.
  I've mentioned Xephyr but indeed you might forget to grab and the
 shortcut
  will go to outside E17 and problems will happen. What about doing it for
  Everything? Then you see where you'll type the action and it's clear.
 You
  can name them e-restart and e-exit commands.
 
  i'm sure not going to do all this work just to remove a menu, that to
 date has
  not caused any issues i know of. i've asked a few times now for real
 info on
  issues it's caused - real datapoints. but unless there is another viable
 and
  sane way of doing these things - they stay. doing some minor
 re-labelling is
  doable. maybe moving a menu item here and there, but now we're talking
 of work
  that REALLY doesn't need to be done - there are much more important
 things to
  do. :)
 
  In the mood of refactoring the menus... if we merge Enlightenment +
  Settings (maybe call it Enlightenment?), we can remove the Desktop
 from
 
  settings includes stuff unrelated to e at all - see the system and
 preferences
  tabs that pull in standard settings tools.
 
  main menu as it's not as useful (menu to change desktop is not that
 common,
  add/configure shelves and gadgets are more like configuration that you
 do
  once a year, show/hide windows can go under Windows main menu entry).
 
  so its in a submenu... that's why its in a submenu. its a single entry
 in the
  main menu for general desktop controls. if it was inside the main menu
 -
  i'd totally agree.
 
  please read up about the latest windows 8 criticisms. you're going the
 exact
  same direction. you're on a head-long run into trying to remove as much
 as you
  can, and in the process you hurt discoverability (and usability) and the
 people
  who don't know the key bindings etc. etc. etc. - everything even vaguely
 useful
  or used even a few times SHOULD be in a menu - even if it's not used
 much. in
  fact we currently have too FEW things in menus. we've removed way too
 much.
  people need to be able to find the thing they want without knowing magic
  gestures, invisible click regions, or obscure keybindings etc. - the
 main menu
  is just that. it's a central point of control that is very fast to find
 (start
  gadget or click anywhere on the desktop - probably one of the first
 things a
  person does when presented with a new blank wm/screen). this menu should
  provide a easy starting point for a user to discover more and access the
 things
  they need or want. preferably nothing should be more than 2 or 3
 clicks/jumps
  away (but reality is that we have so many options, features etc. that we
 just
  can't sensibly manage that without a menu-from-hell).
 
  i fully support the streamlining and improving of menus. agreed, but
 removing
  stuff is something that should be done only as a very last resort.
  re-organizing - sure, but at this stage i sure don't want to spend the
 time
  re-organizing the main menu. modules DEPEND on existing hook points to
 insert
  items - re-orgs affect all of those.
 
   As for Windows i dislike it and shouldn't be that useful... but
 the
  cleanup windows and the action to recover lost windows are indeed
  useful... but likely the DM should avoid losing the windows instead of
 add
  them to a menu? Anyway, this one i see more reasoning to keep.
 
  it happens that apps ask to place their windows off the screen - and e
 honors
  that. in the case of things like guake they legitimately want a window
 off the
  screen so they can slide it in (yes - i know. this is a hack, and should
 be
  part of the wm and quickaccess, but apps will persist in doing these
 things
  themselves). if you ignore such requests you then break such apps, so
 reality
  is... in order to not break some apps, windows can become lost - when
 apps try
  remember their position, and you changed resolution/monitors since
 (x11amp used
  to love doing this), and you had it bottom-right, and now it asks for a
  position off the screen.. and you can't get to the window. that menu item
  exists because of real world problems and we can try as we might - we
 either
  break app a or break app b. the menu is the 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-21 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:42:08 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:12 AM, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On 11/21/2012 07:26 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
   On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:30:42 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
   barbi...@profusion.mobi  said:
  
   Ideas:
  
   - About -  inside settings, doesn't need to be so highlighted as the
  main
   menu. I'd say rename settings so we can use it for more than just
  that,
   it's a place holder for other stuff of enlightenment.
  
   renaming it is not a good idea... where do people find settings them?
  settings
   is one of the better bits of the menu. changing it just because you wish
  to
   get rid of the enlightenment entry is overall becoming worse than better.
  
   - Restart/Exit E: again, this is just for E17 test, so bad for
  end-users.
   I've mentioned Xephyr but indeed you might forget to grab and the
  shortcut
   will go to outside E17 and problems will happen. What about doing it for
   Everything? Then you see where you'll type the action and it's clear.
  You
   can name them e-restart and e-exit commands.
  
   i'm sure not going to do all this work just to remove a menu, that to
  date has
   not caused any issues i know of. i've asked a few times now for real
  info on
   issues it's caused - real datapoints. but unless there is another viable
  and
   sane way of doing these things - they stay. doing some minor
  re-labelling is
   doable. maybe moving a menu item here and there, but now we're talking
  of work
   that REALLY doesn't need to be done - there are much more important
  things to
   do. :)
  
   In the mood of refactoring the menus... if we merge Enlightenment +
   Settings (maybe call it Enlightenment?), we can remove the Desktop
  from
  
   settings includes stuff unrelated to e at all - see the system and
  preferences
   tabs that pull in standard settings tools.
  
   main menu as it's not as useful (menu to change desktop is not that
  common,
   add/configure shelves and gadgets are more like configuration that you
  do
   once a year, show/hide windows can go under Windows main menu entry).
  
   so its in a submenu... that's why its in a submenu. its a single entry
  in the
   main menu for general desktop controls. if it was inside the main menu
  -
   i'd totally agree.
  
   please read up about the latest windows 8 criticisms. you're going the
  exact
   same direction. you're on a head-long run into trying to remove as much
  as you
   can, and in the process you hurt discoverability (and usability) and the
  people
   who don't know the key bindings etc. etc. etc. - everything even vaguely
  useful
   or used even a few times SHOULD be in a menu - even if it's not used
  much. in
   fact we currently have too FEW things in menus. we've removed way too
  much.
   people need to be able to find the thing they want without knowing magic
   gestures, invisible click regions, or obscure keybindings etc. - the
  main menu
   is just that. it's a central point of control that is very fast to find
  (start
   gadget or click anywhere on the desktop - probably one of the first
  things a
   person does when presented with a new blank wm/screen). this menu should
   provide a easy starting point for a user to discover more and access the
  things
   they need or want. preferably nothing should be more than 2 or 3
  clicks/jumps
   away (but reality is that we have so many options, features etc. that we
  just
   can't sensibly manage that without a menu-from-hell).
  
   i fully support the streamlining and improving of menus. agreed, but
  removing
   stuff is something that should be done only as a very last resort.
   re-organizing - sure, but at this stage i sure don't want to spend the
  time
   re-organizing the main menu. modules DEPEND on existing hook points to
  insert
   items - re-orgs affect all of those.
  
As for Windows i dislike it and shouldn't be that useful... but
  the
   cleanup windows and the action to recover lost windows are indeed
   useful... but likely the DM should avoid losing the windows instead of
  add
   them to a menu? Anyway, this one i see more reasoning to keep.
  
   it happens that apps ask to place their windows off the screen - and e
  honors
   that. in the case of things like guake they legitimately want a window
  off the
   screen so they can slide it in (yes - i know. this is a hack, and should
  be
   part of the wm and quickaccess, but apps will persist in doing these
  things
   themselves). if you ignore such requests you then break such apps, so
  reality
   is... in order to not break some apps, windows can become lost - when
  apps try
   remember their position, and you changed resolution/monitors since
  (x11amp used
   to love doing this), and you had it bottom-right, and now it asks for a
   position off the screen.. and you can't get to the window. that menu item
   exists 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
 On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi (mailto:lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi) said:
 
 i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment, exit
 enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
 repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the topic
 already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that makes 
 sense
 to change is Theme - About Theme
 
 

How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration and 
remove its link from the main menu?
 
  On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com 
  (mailto:ras...@rasterman.com)
  wrote:
   On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
   lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi (mailto:lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi) 
   said:
   
Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:

- About: remove (outdated/useless info?)
   
   about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and
   licensing info. the unstable message will go once e is released.
   
  
  
  My question is: why is this any useful to the user? We could hide it
  a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
  sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info
  
  I myself never used it.
  
   
- Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
instead of dark)

   
   
   this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i 
   know
   it doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.
   
  
  
  Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
  not to open a window talking about the current theme.
  
   
- Restart: move to System menu?
   
   restart system or e?
  
  reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be ctrl+alt
  +end
  
   
- Exit: already done by System  Logout
   
   umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close all
   running windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and show a
   popup etc.
   
  
  
  And... what do we need this for?
  
  
  Lucas De Marchi
  
  --
  Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
  web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
  SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
  Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
  http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
  (mailto:enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
 
 
 
 -- 
 - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
 The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com 
 (mailto:ras...@rasterman.com)
 
 
 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
 (mailto:enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 
 

-- 

Leif
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Leif Middelschulte wrote:

 Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
  On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:
 
  i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment,
 exit
  enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
  repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the
 topic
  already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that
 makes sense
  to change is Theme - About Theme
 
 

 How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration
 and remove its link from the main menu?



I like this idea, the theme choose dialog could be bumped a bit and include
a screenshot object (EDC group) and also one about/authors, maybe link to
website. Another option is what I suggested before to make a single about
for theme and e

As fit others (restart, exit): thinking again they sound too technical and
just useful during the development of e itself. I'd say remove it and keep
the keyboard actions.


 
   On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler 
 ras...@rasterman.com javascript:; (mailto:ras...@rasterman.comjavascript:;
 )
   wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:
   
 Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this
 menu
 could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:

 - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)
   
about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and
licensing info. the unstable message will go once e is released.
   
  
  
   My question is: why is this any useful to the user? We could hide it
   a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
   sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info
  
   I myself never used it.
  
   
 - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
 instead of dark)

   
   
this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes -
 i know
it doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.
   
  
  
   Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
   not to open a window talking about the current theme.
  
   
 - Restart: move to System menu?
   
restart system or e?
  
   reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be
 ctrl+alt
   +end
  
   
 - Exit: already done by System  Logout
   
umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close
 all
running windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and
 show a
popup etc.
   
  
  
   And... what do we need this for?
  
  
   Lucas De Marchi
  
  
 --
   Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
   web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases,
 vmware,
   SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
   Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
   http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:; (mailto:
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:;)
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
 
 
 
  --
  - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
  The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com javascript:;(mailto:
 ras...@rasterman.com javascript:;)
 
 
 
 --
  Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
  web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
  SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
  Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
  http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:; (mailto:
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:;)
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 
 

 --

 Leif

 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
 On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Leif Middelschulte wrote:

 Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
  On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:
 
  i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment,
 exit
  enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
  repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the
 topic
  already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that
 makes sense
  to change is Theme - About Theme
 
 

 How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration
 and remove its link from the main menu?



 I like this idea, the theme choose dialog could be bumped a bit and include
 a screenshot object (EDC group) and also one about/authors, maybe link to
 website. Another option is what I suggested before to make a single about
 for theme and e

One single window for E + theme about does sound better.



 As fit others (restart, exit): thinking again they sound too technical and
 just useful during the development of e itself. I'd say remove it and keep
 the keyboard actions.

Indeed, that was what I wanted to say.


Lucas De Marchi

--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:07:06 +0100 Leif Middelschulte
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com said:

 Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
  On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi (mailto:lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi) said:
  
  i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment, exit
  enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
  repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the
  topic already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that
  makes sense to change is Theme - About Theme
  
  
 
 How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration and
 remove its link from the main menu?

to what purpose? unless the whole submenu goes, it may as well stay.

   On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
   (mailto:ras...@rasterman.com) wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi (mailto:lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi)
said:

 Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
 could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:
 
 - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)

about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and
licensing info. the unstable message will go once e is released.

   
   
   My question is: why is this any useful to the user? We could hide it
   a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
   sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info
   
   I myself never used it.
   

 - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
 instead of dark)
 


this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i
know it doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.

   
   
   Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
   not to open a window talking about the current theme.
   

 - Restart: move to System menu?

restart system or e?
   
   reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be ctrl
   +alt +end
   

 - Exit: already done by System  Logout

umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close all
running windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and
show a popup etc.

   
   
   And... what do we need this for?
   
   
   Lucas De Marchi
   
   --
   Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
   web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
   SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
   Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
   http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
   (mailto:enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
   
  
  
  
  -- 
  - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
  The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com
  (mailto:ras...@rasterman.com)
  
  
  --
  Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
  web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
  SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
  Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
  http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
  ___
  enlightenment-devel mailing list
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  (mailto:enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
  
 
 -- 
 
 Leif
 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:43:05 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Leif Middelschulte wrote:
 
  Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
   On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
   lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:
  
   i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment,
  exit
   enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
   repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the
  topic
   already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that
  makes sense
   to change is Theme - About Theme
  
  
 
  How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration
  and remove its link from the main menu?
 
 
 
 I like this idea, the theme choose dialog could be bumped a bit and include
 a screenshot object (EDC group) and also one about/authors, maybe link to
 website. Another option is what I suggested before to make a single about
 for theme and e
 
 As fit others (restart, exit): thinking again they sound too technical and
 just useful during the development of e itself. I'd say remove it and keep
 the keyboard actions.

if there is just a keybinding, i literally will have to jump through a whole
bunch of extra hoops with testing. when you use xpehyr you can kiss keybindings
(and mousebindings) goodbye (without jumping through hoops).

again - where are the actual issues users have had?

  
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler 
  ras...@rasterman.com javascript:;
  (mailto:ras...@rasterman.comjavascript:; )
wrote:
 On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:

  Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this
  menu
  could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:
 
  - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)

 about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and
 licensing info. the unstable message will go once e is released.

   
   
My question is: why is this any useful to the user? We could hide it
a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info
   
I myself never used it.
   

  - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
  instead of dark)
 


 this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes -
  i know
 it doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.

   
   
Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
not to open a window talking about the current theme.
   

  - Restart: move to System menu?

 restart system or e?
   
reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be
  ctrl+alt
+end
   

  - Exit: already done by System  Logout

 umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close
  all
 running windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and
  show a
 popup etc.

   
   
And... what do we need this for?
   
   
Lucas De Marchi
   
   
  --
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases,
  vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:; (mailto:
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:;)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
   
  
  
  
   --
   - Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
   The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com javascript:;
   (mailto:
  ras...@rasterman.com javascript:;)
  
  
  
  --
   Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
   web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
   SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
   Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
   http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
   ___
   enlightenment-devel mailing list
   enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:; (mailto:
  enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:;)
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
  
  
 
  --
 
  Leif
 
  

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:43:05 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
 barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Leif Middelschulte wrote:

  Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
   On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
   lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:
  
   i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment,
  exit
   enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
   repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the
  topic
   already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that
  makes sense
   to change is Theme - About Theme
  
  
 
  How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration
  and remove its link from the main menu?



 I like this idea, the theme choose dialog could be bumped a bit and include
 a screenshot object (EDC group) and also one about/authors, maybe link to
 website. Another option is what I suggested before to make a single about
 for theme and e

 As fit others (restart, exit): thinking again they sound too technical and
 just useful during the development of e itself. I'd say remove it and keep
 the keyboard actions.

 if there is just a keybinding, i literally will have to jump through a whole
 bunch of extra hoops with testing. when you use xpehyr you can kiss 
 keybindings
 (and mousebindings) goodbye (without jumping through hoops).

 again - where are the actual issues users have had?

humn... maybe this was just me. And I'd not claim to be an example of
user. I always felt this menu was weird/misplaced, but you never heard
about it because I never bothered to say a word ;-).  Again, maybe
this is just me trying to think about a regular user


Lucas De Marchi

--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:02:29 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
 wrote:
  On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:43:05 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
  barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
 
  On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Leif Middelschulte wrote:
 
   Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
   lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:
   
i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment,
   exit
enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the
   topic
already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that
   makes sense
to change is Theme - About Theme
   
   
  
   How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme configuration
   and remove its link from the main menu?
 
 
 
  I like this idea, the theme choose dialog could be bumped a bit and include
  a screenshot object (EDC group) and also one about/authors, maybe link to
  website. Another option is what I suggested before to make a single about
  for theme and e
 
  As fit others (restart, exit): thinking again they sound too technical and
  just useful during the development of e itself. I'd say remove it and keep
  the keyboard actions.
 
  if there is just a keybinding, i literally will have to jump through a whole
  bunch of extra hoops with testing. when you use xpehyr you can kiss
  keybindings (and mousebindings) goodbye (without jumping through hoops).
 
  again - where are the actual issues users have had?
 
 humn... maybe this was just me. And I'd not claim to be an example of
 user. I always felt this menu was weird/misplaced, but you never heard
 about it because I never bothered to say a word ;-).  Again, maybe
 this is just me trying to think about a regular user

sure - understood, but fyi - i use that menu every time i test e17 in xephyr.
that menu i there because MOST wm's have that feature (desktops do not though
and e is kind of half-way between), also the about enlightenment needs to go
somewhere... because otherwise there is no sensible way for us to ask the user
what version of e do you have? and for them to tell us (if you expect they
know how to use a package manager to find out etc... then we expect a hell of a
lot from users), other than that - it's a place to visibly list the people
who have contributed to e17 - they deserve a bit of a spotlight, and from a
legal point of view, it indicates in an accessible way to the user what e17's
license is... well at least where to find it. actually it SHOULD literally have
a copy of the license there - something i need to fix before full release. not
to mention just about every app with a menu has an about box.. often help -
about ... so i don't see a usability issue with the about box. for the theme -
you are right theme there was too uninformative - i've made it about theme.
also having something to configure theme from the theme about dialog was a good
idea too. leifs idea of having a button from the theme config dialog to
show the theme about seems just great to me - i like it, but that doesn't
mean we REMOVE the theme about here... either way - it doesnt hurt to have
it as long as that submenu still exists. if we cut it down to 1 item then a 1
item submenu just looks stupid... so we're down to restart and exit. both
of which i use relatively regularly during testing of e and the restart menu
provides a discoverable way to restart e without knowing a magic keybinding,
reading docs or going through a much longer list of keybindings in the gui
config dialog...

now.. if enlightenment should be an entry in the main menu or another level
down or so - that is up for debate - but looking at the main menu, i just don't
see anywhere nice and sensible for it... and it is just 1 entry - we're arguing
over a single entry - it's not like we have 10 or 20 of them filling up the
screen...

so in summary - the menu is there for specific usability reasons - testing and
wm features, as well as just needing a home for specific things like an about
dialog entry... if this menu is actually causing user confusion - i'd like to
see a bit more than 1 data point. like actual users going help- i hit restart
and i dont know what it does - i don't know what to do? or help - what is this
about entry - it confuses me etc. - if there are real problems then maybe we
need to do some work to find a new home for it... but at this moment i can't
see a home for it readily waiting... :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Ideas:

- About - inside settings, doesn't need to be so highlighted as the main
menu. I'd say rename settings so we can use it for more than just that,
it's a place holder for other stuff of enlightenment.
- Restart/Exit E: again, this is just for E17 test, so bad for end-users.
I've mentioned Xephyr but indeed you might forget to grab and the shortcut
will go to outside E17 and problems will happen. What about doing it for
Everything? Then you see where you'll type the action and it's clear. You
can name them e-restart and e-exit commands.

In the mood of refactoring the menus... if we merge Enlightenment +
Settings (maybe call it Enlightenment?), we can remove the Desktop from
main menu as it's not as useful (menu to change desktop is not that common,
add/configure shelves and gadgets are more like configuration that you do
once a year, show/hide windows can go under Windows main menu entry).
As for Windows i dislike it and shouldn't be that useful... but the
cleanup windows and the action to recover lost windows are indeed
useful... but likely the DM should avoid losing the windows instead of add
them to a menu? Anyway, this one i see more reasoning to keep.




On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.comwrote:

 On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:02:29 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:

  On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
 
  wrote:
   On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:43:05 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
   barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
  
   On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Leif Middelschulte wrote:
  
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2012 um 02:43 schrieb Carsten Haitzler:
 On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:; (mailto:
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi javascript:;) said:

 i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart
 enlightenment,
exit
 enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks
 awful and
 repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item -
 thus the
topic
 already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing
 that
makes sense
 to change is Theme - About Theme


   
How about connecting that dialog to a button in the theme
 configuration
and remove its link from the main menu?
  
  
  
   I like this idea, the theme choose dialog could be bumped a bit and
 include
   a screenshot object (EDC group) and also one about/authors, maybe
 link to
   website. Another option is what I suggested before to make a single
 about
   for theme and e
  
   As fit others (restart, exit): thinking again they sound too
 technical and
   just useful during the development of e itself. I'd say remove it and
 keep
   the keyboard actions.
  
   if there is just a keybinding, i literally will have to jump through a
 whole
   bunch of extra hoops with testing. when you use xpehyr you can kiss
   keybindings (and mousebindings) goodbye (without jumping through
 hoops).
  
   again - where are the actual issues users have had?
 
  humn... maybe this was just me. And I'd not claim to be an example of
  user. I always felt this menu was weird/misplaced, but you never heard
  about it because I never bothered to say a word ;-).  Again, maybe
  this is just me trying to think about a regular user

 sure - understood, but fyi - i use that menu every time i test e17 in
 xephyr.
 that menu i there because MOST wm's have that feature (desktops do not
 though
 and e is kind of half-way between), also the about enlightenment needs
 to go
 somewhere... because otherwise there is no sensible way for us to ask the
 user
 what version of e do you have? and for them to tell us (if you expect
 they
 know how to use a package manager to find out etc... then we expect a hell
 of a
 lot from users), other than that - it's a place to visibly list the
 people
 who have contributed to e17 - they deserve a bit of a spotlight, and from a
 legal point of view, it indicates in an accessible way to the user what
 e17's
 license is... well at least where to find it. actually it SHOULD literally
 have
 a copy of the license there - something i need to fix before full release.
 not
 to mention just about every app with a menu has an about box.. often help
 -
 about ... so i don't see a usability issue with the about box. for the
 theme -
 you are right theme there was too uninformative - i've made it about
 theme.
 also having something to configure theme from the theme about dialog was a
 good
 idea too. leifs idea of having a button from the theme config dialog to
 show the theme about seems just great to me - i like it, but that doesn't
 mean we REMOVE the theme about here... either way - it doesnt hurt to have
 it as long as that submenu still exists. if we cut it down to 1 item then
 a 1
 item submenu just looks stupid... so we're down to restart and exit.
 both
 of which i use relatively regularly during testing of e 

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:30:42 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:

 Ideas:
 
 - About - inside settings, doesn't need to be so highlighted as the main
 menu. I'd say rename settings so we can use it for more than just that,
 it's a place holder for other stuff of enlightenment.

renaming it is not a good idea... where do people find settings them? settings
is one of the better bits of the menu. changing it just because you wish to
get rid of the enlightenment entry is overall becoming worse than better.

 - Restart/Exit E: again, this is just for E17 test, so bad for end-users.
 I've mentioned Xephyr but indeed you might forget to grab and the shortcut
 will go to outside E17 and problems will happen. What about doing it for
 Everything? Then you see where you'll type the action and it's clear. You
 can name them e-restart and e-exit commands.

i'm sure not going to do all this work just to remove a menu, that to date has
not caused any issues i know of. i've asked a few times now for real info on
issues it's caused - real datapoints. but unless there is another viable and
sane way of doing these things - they stay. doing some minor re-labelling is
doable. maybe moving a menu item here and there, but now we're talking of work
that REALLY doesn't need to be done - there are much more important things to
do. :)

 In the mood of refactoring the menus... if we merge Enlightenment +
 Settings (maybe call it Enlightenment?), we can remove the Desktop from

settings includes stuff unrelated to e at all - see the system and preferences
tabs that pull in standard settings tools.

 main menu as it's not as useful (menu to change desktop is not that common,
 add/configure shelves and gadgets are more like configuration that you do
 once a year, show/hide windows can go under Windows main menu entry).

so its in a submenu... that's why its in a submenu. its a single entry in the
main menu for general desktop controls. if it was inside the main menu -
i'd totally agree.

please read up about the latest windows 8 criticisms. you're going the exact
same direction. you're on a head-long run into trying to remove as much as you
can, and in the process you hurt discoverability (and usability) and the people
who don't know the key bindings etc. etc. etc. - everything even vaguely useful
or used even a few times SHOULD be in a menu - even if it's not used much. in
fact we currently have too FEW things in menus. we've removed way too much.
people need to be able to find the thing they want without knowing magic
gestures, invisible click regions, or obscure keybindings etc. - the main menu
is just that. it's a central point of control that is very fast to find (start
gadget or click anywhere on the desktop - probably one of the first things a
person does when presented with a new blank wm/screen). this menu should
provide a easy starting point for a user to discover more and access the things
they need or want. preferably nothing should be more than 2 or 3 clicks/jumps
away (but reality is that we have so many options, features etc. that we just
can't sensibly manage that without a menu-from-hell).

i fully support the streamlining and improving of menus. agreed, but removing
stuff is something that should be done only as a very last resort.
re-organizing - sure, but at this stage i sure don't want to spend the time
re-organizing the main menu. modules DEPEND on existing hook points to insert
items - re-orgs affect all of those.

 As for Windows i dislike it and shouldn't be that useful... but the
 cleanup windows and the action to recover lost windows are indeed
 useful... but likely the DM should avoid losing the windows instead of add
 them to a menu? Anyway, this one i see more reasoning to keep.

it happens that apps ask to place their windows off the screen - and e honors
that. in the case of things like guake they legitimately want a window off the
screen so they can slide it in (yes - i know. this is a hack, and should be
part of the wm and quickaccess, but apps will persist in doing these things
themselves). if you ignore such requests you then break such apps, so reality
is... in order to not break some apps, windows can become lost - when apps try
remember their position, and you changed resolution/monitors since (x11amp used
to love doing this), and you had it bottom-right, and now it asks for a
position off the screen.. and you can't get to the window. that menu item
exists because of real world problems and we can try as we might - we either
break app a or break app b. the menu is the solution to when things break. if
we could actually modify the apps to ensure none of them do stupid things like
this - we'd have a good solution... but we can't :)

also fyi - the windows menu is there because most wm's in x11 have had such a
thing, and i highly suggest we don't make the gnome 3 mistake of forgetting our
roots in favor of chasing some userbase that may never come. it also serves the

Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-20 Thread P Purkayastha
On 11/21/2012 07:26 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
 On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:30:42 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
 barbi...@profusion.mobi  said:

 Ideas:

 - About -  inside settings, doesn't need to be so highlighted as the main
 menu. I'd say rename settings so we can use it for more than just that,
 it's a place holder for other stuff of enlightenment.

 renaming it is not a good idea... where do people find settings them? settings
 is one of the better bits of the menu. changing it just because you wish to
 get rid of the enlightenment entry is overall becoming worse than better.

 - Restart/Exit E: again, this is just for E17 test, so bad for end-users.
 I've mentioned Xephyr but indeed you might forget to grab and the shortcut
 will go to outside E17 and problems will happen. What about doing it for
 Everything? Then you see where you'll type the action and it's clear. You
 can name them e-restart and e-exit commands.

 i'm sure not going to do all this work just to remove a menu, that to date has
 not caused any issues i know of. i've asked a few times now for real info on
 issues it's caused - real datapoints. but unless there is another viable and
 sane way of doing these things - they stay. doing some minor re-labelling is
 doable. maybe moving a menu item here and there, but now we're talking of work
 that REALLY doesn't need to be done - there are much more important things to
 do. :)

 In the mood of refactoring the menus... if we merge Enlightenment +
 Settings (maybe call it Enlightenment?), we can remove the Desktop from

 settings includes stuff unrelated to e at all - see the system and preferences
 tabs that pull in standard settings tools.

 main menu as it's not as useful (menu to change desktop is not that common,
 add/configure shelves and gadgets are more like configuration that you do
 once a year, show/hide windows can go under Windows main menu entry).

 so its in a submenu... that's why its in a submenu. its a single entry in the
 main menu for general desktop controls. if it was inside the main menu -
 i'd totally agree.

 please read up about the latest windows 8 criticisms. you're going the exact
 same direction. you're on a head-long run into trying to remove as much as you
 can, and in the process you hurt discoverability (and usability) and the 
 people
 who don't know the key bindings etc. etc. etc. - everything even vaguely 
 useful
 or used even a few times SHOULD be in a menu - even if it's not used much. in
 fact we currently have too FEW things in menus. we've removed way too much.
 people need to be able to find the thing they want without knowing magic
 gestures, invisible click regions, or obscure keybindings etc. - the main menu
 is just that. it's a central point of control that is very fast to find (start
 gadget or click anywhere on the desktop - probably one of the first things a
 person does when presented with a new blank wm/screen). this menu should
 provide a easy starting point for a user to discover more and access the 
 things
 they need or want. preferably nothing should be more than 2 or 3 clicks/jumps
 away (but reality is that we have so many options, features etc. that we just
 can't sensibly manage that without a menu-from-hell).

 i fully support the streamlining and improving of menus. agreed, but removing
 stuff is something that should be done only as a very last resort.
 re-organizing - sure, but at this stage i sure don't want to spend the time
 re-organizing the main menu. modules DEPEND on existing hook points to insert
 items - re-orgs affect all of those.

  As for Windows i dislike it and shouldn't be that useful... but the
 cleanup windows and the action to recover lost windows are indeed
 useful... but likely the DM should avoid losing the windows instead of add
 them to a menu? Anyway, this one i see more reasoning to keep.

 it happens that apps ask to place their windows off the screen - and e honors
 that. in the case of things like guake they legitimately want a window off 
 the
 screen so they can slide it in (yes - i know. this is a hack, and should be
 part of the wm and quickaccess, but apps will persist in doing these things
 themselves). if you ignore such requests you then break such apps, so reality
 is... in order to not break some apps, windows can become lost - when apps try
 remember their position, and you changed resolution/monitors since (x11amp 
 used
 to love doing this), and you had it bottom-right, and now it asks for a
 position off the screen.. and you can't get to the window. that menu item
 exists because of real world problems and we can try as we might - we either
 break app a or break app b. the menu is the solution to when things break. if
 we could actually modify the apps to ensure none of them do stupid things like
 this - we'd have a good solution... but we can't :)

 also fyi - the windows menu is there because most wm's in x11 have had such a
 thing, and i highly suggest we don't 

[E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:

- About: remove (outdated/useless info?)
- Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
instead of dark)
- Restart:  move to System menu?
- Exit: already  done by System  Logout


Thoughts?

Lucas De Marchi

--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread Alex-P. Natsios
About : is not at all useless unless outdated.
Theme: naturally since i think it shows the current theme's about
page, and there has not been one created for dark thus the old one
from bw is used.
Restart: could confuse people if put in System
Exit: ok this one might really be useless after all :P

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
 Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
 could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:

 - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)
 - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
 instead of dark)
 - Restart:  move to System menu?
 - Exit: already  done by System  Logout


 Thoughts?

 Lucas De Marchi

 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel



-- 
Regards,

Alex-P. Natsios
(a.k.a Drakevr)

--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:

 Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
 could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:
 
 - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)

about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and licensing
info. the unstable message will go once e is released.

 - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
 instead of dark)

this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i know it
doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.

 - Restart:  move to System menu?

restart system or e?

 - Exit: already  done by System  Logout

umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close all running
windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and show a popup etc.

 Thoughts?
 
 Lucas De Marchi
 
 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
 On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
 lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:

 Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
 could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:

 - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)

 about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and licensing
 info. the unstable message will go once e is released.

My question is:  why is this any useful to the user?  We could hide it
a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info

I myself never used it.


 - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
 instead of dark)

 this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i know it
 doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.

Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
not to open a window talking about the current theme.


 - Restart:  move to System menu?

 restart system or e?

reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be ctrl+alt+end


 - Exit: already  done by System  Logout

 umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close all 
 running
 windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and show a popup etc.

And... what do we need this for?


Lucas De Marchi

--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread Massimo Maiurana
Lucas De Marchi, il 19/11/2012 15:35, ha scritto:

 this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i know 
 it
 doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.
 
 Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
 not to open a window talking about the current theme.

then it would be enough to rename it about theme, as I believe it is (or
was) in e16.
and about should be renamed about e, to make it clearer...

-- 

  Massimo Maiurana   GPG keyID #7044D601

  La fede e' credere in cio' che sai non essere vero
[Mark Twain]



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
I believe a better fit is to merge both about in one. The theme always
define the layout, then it could define its own stuff together with About
e contents (more like license and list of authors).


On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Massimo Maiurana maiur...@gmail.comwrote:

 Lucas De Marchi, il 19/11/2012 15:35, ha scritto:

  this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i
 know it
  doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.
 
  Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
  not to open a window talking about the current theme.

 then it would be enough to rename it about theme, as I believe it is (or
 was) in e16.
 and about should be renamed about e, to make it clearer...

 --

   Massimo Maiurana   GPG keyID #7044D601

   La fede e' credere in cio' che sai non essere vero
 [Mark Twain]



 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel




-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
MSN: barbi...@gmail.com
Skype: gsbarbieri
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:

 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
 wrote:
  On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
 
  Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
  could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:
 
  - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)
 
  about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and
  licensing info. the unstable message will go once e is released.
 
 My question is:  why is this any useful to the user?  We could hide it
 a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
 sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info
 
 I myself never used it.
 
 
  - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
  instead of dark)
 
  this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i know
  it doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.
 
 Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
 not to open a window talking about the current theme.

actually thats a great idea... theme about should have a button there for
changing theme - a signal to bring up the theme selector. good idea. :)

 
  - Restart:  move to System menu?
 
  restart system or e?
 
 reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be ctrl+alt
 +end

still not sure it belongs in system as its not affecting your system as a whole
which is what the other stuff in system are... and restart e will make people
go e? - those not familiar with enlightenment may not be familiar with the
shortening to a single letter... and if we make it restart enlightenment the
button is going to be massive because we aren't doing linebreaks in the button
text...

  - Exit: already  done by System  Logout
 
  umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close all
  running windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and show a
  popup etc.
 
 And... what do we need this for?

if you want e to behave like every other wm has in existence on exit. you may
not use e as your session manager and want to exit e to have another wm start
after it.

all in all - i've never heard any complaints about the e menu until today -
over the years. you're the first at least that i hear saying that its
confusing/bad... so until there is more evidence, i'd say keep it.

 
 Lucas De Marchi
 
 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] E17 - enlightenment menu

2012-11-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:35:18 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:

i just tried adding about enlightenment and restart enlightenment, exit
enlightenment and it's horrible text duplication - it looks awful and
repetitive. it's already under the enlightenment parent item - thus the topic
already is enlightenment... there's context. the on ly thing that makes sense
to change is Theme - About Theme

 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
 wrote:
  On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:46:04 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
  lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
 
  Does the enlightenment menu still make sense? IMO actions on this menu
  could either be absorbed by other menus or removed altogether:
 
  - About: remove (outdated/useless info?)
 
  about is 100% up to date. it shows the current version, authors and
  licensing info. the unstable message will go once e is released.
 
 My question is:  why is this any useful to the user?  We could hide it
 a bit more in the menus or anywhere else, not standing in the first
 sublevel menu as if the user had an urgent need to know this info
 
 I myself never used it.
 
 
  - Theme: remove (btw, it opens a window saying I'm using BW theme
  instead of dark)
 
  this is the place themers can advertise... it should stay. and yes - i know
  it doesnt talk about the new theme - it's not updated yet.
 
 Why? My first guess when I look at it is to change the current theme,
 not to open a window talking about the current theme.
 
 
  - Restart:  move to System menu?
 
  restart system or e?
 
 reaname it to Restart E or remove, letting things like this to be ctrl+alt
 +end
 
 
  - Exit: already  done by System  Logout
 
  umm no. exit is different. exit just exits e. logout tries to close all
  running windows then exits. exit is immediate. logout will wait and show a
  popup etc.
 
 And... what do we need this for?
 
 
 Lucas De Marchi
 
 --
 Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
 web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
 SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
 Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
 ___
 enlightenment-devel mailing list
 enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel