Re: [E-devel] Patch for Ecore_Config ARGB parsing glitch
Just running through my todo list and I don't see the patch for this attached. Andy On 8 Sep 2007, at 19:15, Dylan Shell wrote: ecore_config in CVS head has an error in its handling of ARGB colours. Currently the ecore_config_typed_val function assumes that colours are strings, whereas the __ecore_argbstr_to_long means that its actually a long. Attached is a patch which seems to fix the glitch. Dylan. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel --- Andrew Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rectang.com http://rectang.com - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now http://get.splunk.com/ ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Patch for Ecore_Config ARGB parsing glitch
ecore_config in CVS head has an error in its handling of ARGB colours. Currently the ecore_config_typed_val function assumes that colours are strings, whereas the __ecore_argbstr_to_long means that its actually a long. Attached is a patch which seems to fix the glitch. Dylan. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Patch for Ecore_Config ARGB parsing.
Dylan Shell wrote: Current CVS has a minor bug where ARGB strings that use the 32nd bit are lost. For example # will parse into a = 0x7F, r,g,b = 0xFF. Attached is a simple fix that replaces the strtol with a strtoll, fixing the glitch. Dylan. Why not strtoul and unsigned longs? --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Patch for Ecore_Config ARGB parsing.
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Bryan Kadzban wrote: Why not strtoul and unsigned longs? Ahh, that sounds like a far better idea. I didn't know of strtoul. I thought having to do a 32 to check the string thereafter was unnecessarily complicated. Presumably the less than zero error would then be removed altogther? Dylan. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
