Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: libs/imlib2 azundris
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:12:54 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Friday, 08 April 2005, at 08:55:21 (-0700),
> E CVS List wrote:
>
> > Log Message:
> > * wonky versioning.
> >
> > RPM packagers: imlib2 -- libungif-devel vs giflib-devel (SuSE)
>
> What are you trying to point out here? Should we point to a
> particular header file instead?
>
> > +%{_libdir}/imlib2/*/*.a
> > +%{_libdir}/imlib2/*/*.la
>
> I thought we established that these are useless. Did I miss
> something? Shouldn't we be removing them, not packaging them?
> *confused*
michael is right - those files are useless. libtool creates them but imlib2
never uses them runtime as it opens *.so files only with dlopen()
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
> ---
> "No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in
> still water that we can see." -- Taoist Proverb
>
>
> ---
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> ___
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
>
--
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: libs/imlib2 azundris
On Monday 11 April 2005 08:12 pm, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Friday, 08 April 2005, at 08:55:21 (-0700), > > E CVS List wrote: > > Log Message: > > * wonky versioning. > > > > RPM packagers: imlib2 -- libungif-devel vs giflib-devel (SuSE) > > What are you trying to point out here? Should we point to a > particular header file instead? libungif and giflib are drop-in replacements (basically libungif is giflib minus LZW compression) ... since LZW is dead now worldwide (afaik), libungif can die -mike --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
[E-devel] Re: E CVS: libs/imlib2 azundris
On Friday, 08 April 2005, at 08:55:21 (-0700),
E CVS List wrote:
> Log Message:
> * wonky versioning.
>
> RPM packagers: imlib2 -- libungif-devel vs giflib-devel (SuSE)
What are you trying to point out here? Should we point to a
particular header file instead?
> +%{_libdir}/imlib2/*/*.a
> +%{_libdir}/imlib2/*/*.la
I thought we established that these are useless. Did I miss
something? Shouldn't we be removing them, not packaging them?
*confused*
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
"No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in
still water that we can see." -- Taoist Proverb
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
