Re: [E-devel] connection modules proplem

2011-10-05 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 05/10/11 13:12, المسالم المسالمة wrote:
>
>
> بتاريخ 05 أكتوبر, 2011 09:52 ص، جاء من Tom Hacohen
> mailto:tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com>>:
>
> On 04/10/11 17:46, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> If you are sure, then you are sure, I'm not going to argue with
> that,
> but from what I know, there are different dialects, and it makes
> zero
> sense not to have translations per dialect.
>
>
> After consulting with other Arabic users, it seems that you are
> right, and for some reason Arabs don't do different translations per
> dialect. I.e interfaces are always translated to the standard Arabic.
>
> Odd. :)
>
> --
> Tom.
>
>
> its not odd as you think
>
> but arabic's dialects not international famous dialects like en_uk or en_us
>
> so all of arabic translators have no choice but using standard arabic
>
> beside .. using one standard and united language is more easiest way
> to speak to everyone (( ARABIAN , FOREIGNERS WHOSE START TO LEARN IT ))
>
> thats why we are using one and united language

I.c, thanks for the explanations.

--
Tom.


--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] connection modules proplem

2011-10-04 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 04/10/11 17:46, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> If you are sure, then you are sure, I'm not going to argue with that,
> but from what I know, there are different dialects, and it makes zero
> sense not to have translations per dialect.

After consulting with other Arabic users, it seems that you are right, 
and for some reason Arabs don't do different translations per dialect. 
I.e interfaces are always translated to the standard Arabic.

Odd. :)

--
Tom.

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] connection modules proplem

2011-10-04 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 04/10/11 16:21, المسالم المسالمة wrote:
> a.. Mr.tom
>
> you misunderstood the point at wikipedia
>
> wikipedia is not right all the time because it built and still built by
> Volontaires who want  to help
>
> but some time those people make some mistakes some of it is small and some
> big . just like this ..  which you are talking about it
>
> you see there are two arabic types in our countries
>
> they are  traditional arabic or what wikipedia called it "" Standard Arabic
> "" , and the local arabic
>
> the traditional arabic is a united language between the peoples of those
> countries
>
> and the local arabic wich it called (( Dialect )) and this kind of arabic is
> specially for the locals
>
> ==
>
> and all of the arabic translators who are going to translate any project
> will use the traditional arabic not the Dialect
>
> ==
>
> thats why i said before (( the arabic language is a united language ))

Well, there's standard English (en_UK - yeah, I'm trolling here, though 
for real...) and there are different dialects, like en_US and en_AU.

I.e people write things differently, or have different words for things, 
but still it's the same language structure.

It sounds odd that Arabic speaking people have two languages, and I 
really doubt it's the case. If that's really the case, than what's the 
point in still sustaining the dialect?

If you are sure, then you are sure, I'm not going to argue with that, 
but from what I know, there are different dialects, and it makes zero 
sense not to have translations per dialect.

--
Tom.


--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] connection modules proplem

2011-10-04 Thread المسالم المسالمة
a.. Mr.tom

you misunderstood the point at wikipedia

wikipedia is not right all the time because it built and still built by
Volontaires who want  to help

but some time those people make some mistakes some of it is small and some
big . just like this ..  which you are talking about it

you see there are two arabic types in our countries

they are  traditional arabic or what wikipedia called it "" Standard Arabic
"" , and the local arabic

the traditional arabic is a united language between the peoples of those
countries

and the local arabic wich it called (( Dialect )) and this kind of arabic is
specially for the locals

==

and all of the arabic translators who are going to translate any project
will use the traditional arabic not the Dialect

==

thats why i said before (( the arabic language is a united language ))
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel