Re: [E-devel] efl packaging files

2013-11-07 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 15:08:45 +0900 Jérôme Pinot ngc...@gmail.com said:

 Hi,
 
 Instead of having:
   efl/pkgbuild
   efl/spec
 (and maybe more later)
 
 It would be cleaner to have one single packaging folder:
 efl/packaging/pkgbuild
 efl/packaging/spec
 etc.

i'm currently of the opinion of gah... not more work shuffling things
about... until we get way too many dirs for pkging... how about we let it
be? :)


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - I code, therefore I am --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)ras...@rasterman.com


--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


[E-devel] efl packaging files

2013-11-06 Thread Jérôme Pinot
Hi,

Instead of having:
  efl/pkgbuild
  efl/spec
(and maybe more later)

It would be cleaner to have one single packaging folder:
efl/packaging/pkgbuild
efl/packaging/spec
etc.

-- 
Jérôme Pinot
http://ngc891.blogdns.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers
Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore
techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most 
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel