Re: [E-devel] imlib2-1.1.0-no-x patch

2003-12-12 Thread Ibukun Olumuyiwa 
On Thu 11 Dec 2003, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:46:25 + Luis Correia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
> 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > To start, I would like to send congratulations on this fine piece of code!
> > 
> > Anyway what brings me to bother you gents is that I have altered a bit 
> > Imlib2-1.1.0 to be able to work correctly in a X11 free environment.
> > 
> > Work has improved a lot from version 1.0.6, where it simply did not work.
> > 
> > Here's what I did, i ran './configure --without-x' but it failed i some 
> > source files because there was no #ifdef X_DISPLAY_MISSING to enclose 
> > the x11 dependencies.
> > 
> > Anyway I have the patch ready to send to someone, but i'm not spamming 
> > the list with it... (although it is only 907 bytes...)
> > 
> > Please reply to me directly, am I'm not subscribed to this list nor plan 
> > to do it for now.
> 
> thats great but...
> we've alreayd done this. in CVS. if you check out imlib2 from CVS it should not
> just run without X libs, but also build without x headers too (and x libs). we
> just havent stemped out a release of it... thats all :)
> 
 
Speaking of which, Imlib2 does deserve a new release, especially with the
freetype2 updates.

-- 

Ibukun Olumuyiwa
http://xcomputerman.com

"Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy
getting get understanding." - Proverbs 4:7


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Re: [E-devel] imlib2-1.1.0-no-x patch

2003-12-12 Thread Mike Frysinger 
On Friday 12 December 2003 02:10, Ibukun Olumuyiwa wrote:
> Speaking of which, Imlib2 does deserve a new release, especially with the
> freetype2 updates.

maybe i'm missing something but the only real difference between the released 
1.1.0 and the current cvs is this no-X11 stuff ...
-mike


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature

Re: [E-devel] Re: Bugs on e16 CVS

2003-12-12 Thread Kim Woelders 
JC Wong wrote:
  Making install in po
  make[1]: Entering directory `/home/catalyst/CVS/e16/e/po'
  /bin/sh `case ".././mkinstalldirs" in /*) echo ".././mkinstalldirs" ;;
  *) echo "../.././mkinstalldirs" ;; esac` /usr/share
  ../.././mkinstalldirs: ../.././mkinstalldirs: No such file or directory
  make[1]: *** [install-data-yes] Error 127
  make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/catalyst/CVS/e16/e/po'
  make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
This problem started bugging me when I updated from RH9 to FC1
(i.e. gettext 0.11.4 -> 0.12.1).
It turns out that autogen.sh -> setup-gettext.sh -> autopoint --force
makes po/Makefile.in.in which contains
mkinstalldirs = $(SHELL) `case "$(MKINSTALLDIRS)" in /*) echo 
"$(MKINSTALLDIRS)" ;; *) echo "$(top_builddir)/$(MKINSTALLDIRS)" ;; esac`

Changing that into

mkinstalldirs = $(SHELL) $(MKINSTALLDIRS)

makes things work.
This is obviously a stupid hack. Does anybody have a proper solution?
/Kim

---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel