Re: [E-devel] [patch] elicit color settings

2006-01-12 Thread Andrew Williams
That standing, it would be an idea to use the common notation as in the
rest of the EFL, even if that is "technically misleading" right?

A

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:03:32PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:17:55 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> 
> > dan sinclair wrote:
> > > Why is this _argb instead of _rgba? Most of the efl code that I've seen 
> > > that take colour params take them as r, g, b, a. Might make sense to 
> > > keep this consistent as I'm sure it will cause a few mistakes.
> > > 
> > > I don't think I've seen #aarrggbb used, isn't it usually #rrggbbaa?
> > 
> > that's how ecore_config was when I got there, and I haven't been 
> > diddling very much in other places...
> > 
> > I can write up a patch to change that, however..
> 
> argb is literally how it's stored in memory in terms of a 32bit word with the
> MSB being A and LSB being B. as with numebrs u write digits from MSN to LSN.
> 
> -- 
> - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
> The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 裸好多
> Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
> 


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Pavel Boldin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric Sandall wrote:

>
>
> I have no such file libemixer.so.0 on my machine, but the compile
> log for evolume 0.0.19 mentions compiling libemixer.so, but does
> not seem to install it.
>
that strange, because up from 0.0.18 emixer builded statically in
module.so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxnmGihy+HSYX1WIRAs6jAKCwggyRNDJdUlxRY+WDXUSVHGoaIQCghRTO
wNBDbYL65UcNh2CJyPVgmbA=
=p579
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


[E-devel] BUG: configuration panel->background settings->advanced settings

2006-01-12 Thread Aleksej Struk
Hi all,

I just compiled e17 from cvs. After I started to resetup it, I found one bug.
It happens when I try to set up my background using configuaration
panel. If I use "Advanced Settings", for example, hoose that I want to
have a backround for all desktops, and then go back to Default Desktop
and press apply, e17 seg faults.

Moreover, I realised that e17 seg faults only if Default Desktop
option is selected, choosing your desktop background, and this
settings are applied.

Thanks
Aleksej


--
Aleksej Struk
Master Degree Student
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Faculty of Computer Science
phone: +39-0471-061749
cell phone: +39-3204627049
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Sandall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Pavel Boldin wrote:


I have no such file libemixer.so.0 on my machine, but the compile
log for evolume 0.0.19 mentions compiling libemixer.so, but does
not seem to install it.


that strange, because up from 0.0.18 emixer builded statically in
module.so


I'll try recompiling again and see.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/  |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxqDLHXt9dKjv3WERArGvAJsH4igj1BHCgljW4LNkcJTQxJCFMQCdF0n1
Mbcl3EmDqz4yTBbbYfYVO5M=
=4i6A
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Pavel Boldin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Eric Sandall wrote:

>
>
> I'll try recompiling again and see.


try version 0.0.20
http://paq.osdn.org.ua/~davinchi/

- --

Pavel Boldin aka davinchi. mail-to: ldavinchi /at\ inbox _dot_ ru
ZU - Zagovor Unixoidov. SSAU 303.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxqH7ihy+HSYX1WIRAsGzAKCuoC2SKPPHFFlzqMJvcwls/s7O0ACdFawR
Fm91Gp+KyfOz16WZrrl953w=
=tZZv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Ciro Mattia Gonano
Il giorno gio, 12/01/2006 alle 22.37 +0400, Pavel Boldin ha scritto:

> try version 0.0.20
> http://paq.osdn.org.ua/~davinchi/
> 
I tried 0.0.19 and 0.0.20, module compiles well, but the module
interface on enlightenment's panel doesn't highlight the "Configure"
button, and the "config" option on module's pop-up menu tells me that I
have no mixers [1].
I've a single soundcard, and every other mixer does work correctly.

[1]
http://dev.winged.it/gallery/screenshots/evolume_0_0_20_broken_config_dialog

-- 
Ciro Mattia Gonano
  Winged.it Master   - http://www.winged.it
  FlyingCircus.it member - http://www.flyingcircus.it
GPG Keynumber: DEF86925 --- ICQ#: 52631406


signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio è firmata


Re: [E-devel] [patch] elicit color settings

2006-01-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:02:08 + Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:

> That standing, it would be an idea to use the common notation as in the
> rest of the EFL, even if that is "technically misleading" right?

well actually i would argue the common notation IS ARGB. because literally that
is HOW its stored in video ram on "pc graphics cards" (ie almost all graphics
cards on all systems - even apple ppc boxes). evas's textblock when defining
colors alos uses ARGB for #AARRGGBB (eg #88ff8800 == semi-transparent orange.
thort form is #8f80 if you only need 12 bits of color vs. 24bits, and if its 3
digits alpha is assumed to be 255 (full) ie #ff80 == #f80)

> A
> 
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:03:32PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:17:55 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> > 
> > > dan sinclair wrote:
> > > > Why is this _argb instead of _rgba? Most of the efl code that I've seen 
> > > > that take colour params take them as r, g, b, a. Might make sense to 
> > > > keep this consistent as I'm sure it will cause a few mistakes.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think I've seen #aarrggbb used, isn't it usually #rrggbbaa?
> > > 
> > > that's how ecore_config was when I got there, and I haven't been 
> > > diddling very much in other places...
> > > 
> > > I can write up a patch to change that, however..
> > 
> > argb is literally how it's stored in memory in terms of a 32bit word with
> > the MSB being A and LSB being B. as with numebrs u write digits from MSN to
> > LSN.
> > 
> > -- 
> > - Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
> > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 裸好多
> > Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
> > 
> 


-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Sandall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Pavel Boldin wrote:


try version 0.0.20
http://paq.osdn.org.ua/~davinchi/


That works, thanks. :) Even the module configuration shows up and
works for me. I've updated the Source Mage GNU/Linux package to
0.0.20.

Thanks!

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/  |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxu6YHXt9dKjv3WERAk6JAJ0eB8WK9NYeCvY0lM2Khf0lPthi2ACcCxba
OocEwmdBXMIsvivnjy/wtZc=
=Lp7+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Sandall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Hawkwind  wrote:

I've just tested 0.20 and got the same No Mixer problem.  I've got a
freshly updated E as of very late last night and restarting E doesn't
help either.  It compiles and loads without any problems, but nothing
can be configured.



Did you remove the prior configuration for evolume? You can find these
with:
  $  find $HOME | grep -i evolume

CC'ing e-devel list.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/  |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxvkEHXt9dKjv3WERAsYHAJ9jXZqbeR+2gEQlMLlQQT5s74Uf3ACgsMWY
qWVdw6QZ7W6ag8B/oGG8MVo=
=NLnr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


[E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Sandall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of
eloquence installed. While compiling I get this error:
gcc -shared  .libs/e_mod_main.o .libs/e_mod_config.o .libs/xmms.o
.libs/bmp.o .libs/bmpx.o .libs/audacious.o .libs/amarok.o .libs/mpd.o
- -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib /usr/lib/libgtk.so
/usr/lib/libgdk.so /usr/lib/libgmodule.so /usr/lib/libglib.so -ldl
- -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/lib/libxmms.so /usr/lib/libe.so
- -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore/.libs
- -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_txt/.libs
- -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_job/.libs
- -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_x/.libs
- -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_con/.libs  -march=pentium4 -mmmx
- -mfpmath=sse -msse -msse2 @dlopen_libs@ -Wl,-soname -Wl,module.so -o
.libs/module.so
gcc: @dlopen_libs@: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [module.la] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/eloquence-0.4.5/src'

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/  |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxvmgHXt9dKjv3WERAnztAJ9ZHkBozIwriCJDRG7Hdbvy646mMwCfeG4z
tn3cq9gSAieO4n3UMIVA52Y=
=3wB1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Sandall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Hawkwind  wrote:

I didn't have any prior to this build, as I always check.



Please keep this on list, I am not an e17 developer, just a user.

- -sandalle

- --
Eric Sandall |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/  |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxwDfHXt9dKjv3WERAg+0AJ0WVw496ZJREeR46RA4mKR1YNFuSQCeN3k8
WhiOFVzIsTtBf1bss58IzhY=
=b1DK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] eVolume 0.0.19 buildfix release

2006-01-12 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:23:15 +0100
Ciro Mattia Gonano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Il giorno gio, 12/01/2006 alle 22.37 +0400, Pavel Boldin ha scritto:
> 
> > try version 0.0.20
> > http://paq.osdn.org.ua/~davinchi/
> > 
> I tried 0.0.19 and 0.0.20, module compiles well, but the module
> interface on enlightenment's panel doesn't highlight the "Configure"
> button, and the "config" option on module's pop-up menu tells me that
> I have no mixers [1].
> I've a single soundcard, and every other mixer does work correctly.
> 
> [1]
> http://dev.winged.it/gallery/screenshots/evolume_0_0_20_broken_config_dialog
> 

same here - but with 3 cards/mixers


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


[E-devel] Imlib not working under xorg-6.9?

2006-01-12 Thread chinlu chinawa
Hi,

I've ported xwindows from xfree4.4 towards to
xorg-6.9, and seems to be working properly.

I did actually remove /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11, so this
is a fresh new server's installation.

The funny thing is that after this, imlib is no longer
working on my computer. 

I've recompiled it, and it did it nicely, but when I
try to execute again the example program, the Xlib
version found in here:

http://www.enlightenment.org/Libraries/Imlib/index.html

It still doesn't show any images at all, as I've been
trying with different formats. 

I've kept X loading same modules, and tried as well
getting rid of those not actually found on my previous
xfree server configuration, such as xcomposite.

Is this a bug?

Kind Regards,




___ 
Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo 
http://uk.photos.yahoo.com


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] ecore_exe event type consistancy.

2006-01-12 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:50:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:35:42 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > i would argue that ECORE_EVENT_EXE is fine as its a CORE ecore event
> > (not a sub ecore system like ecore_con)... ?
> 
> I'm thinking consistency in naming things IPC related.  I think that
> merging fork'n'pipe with ecore_ipc might be good, it's just another
> IPC method, why should it be different?  Most of the ways of dealing
> with it from the ecore users perspective are mostly similar.  Most of
> the differences are simply due to current inconsistent naming and
> lack of an exe add event.  The user doesn't see any core ecore / sub
> ecore issues, it's all ecore_*_whatever to them.
> 
> As I said before, the naming of the exit event is historical, and I'm
> prepared to wear that.  The data event is new though, and should be
> consistent with other IPC data events.  It's semantics are the same,
> hell most of the code was just cut'n'paste from ecore_con.

I've thought about it some more, and the fact that the ecore_exe
functions are all called ecore_exe_* like the "sub" ecore functions
means that I consider it to be more consistent.  The style guide says to
use name spaced, object oriented style names, so ecore_exe_* and
ECORE_EXE_* has to be the way to go.

I'll make these changes, but keep ECORE_EVENT_EXE_EXIT around for
historical reasons (so no one can blame me for beaking evidence).


pgphCBYmwgpSL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [E-devel] ecore_exe event type consistancy.

2006-01-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:04:19 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

> On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:50:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:35:42 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > i would argue that ECORE_EVENT_EXE is fine as its a CORE ecore event
> > > (not a sub ecore system like ecore_con)... ?
> > 
> > I'm thinking consistency in naming things IPC related.  I think that
> > merging fork'n'pipe with ecore_ipc might be good, it's just another
> > IPC method, why should it be different?  Most of the ways of dealing
> > with it from the ecore users perspective are mostly similar.  Most of
> > the differences are simply due to current inconsistent naming and
> > lack of an exe add event.  The user doesn't see any core ecore / sub
> > ecore issues, it's all ecore_*_whatever to them.
> > 
> > As I said before, the naming of the exit event is historical, and I'm
> > prepared to wear that.  The data event is new though, and should be
> > consistent with other IPC data events.  It's semantics are the same,
> > hell most of the code was just cut'n'paste from ecore_con.
> 
> I've thought about it some more, and the fact that the ecore_exe
> functions are all called ecore_exe_* like the "sub" ecore functions
> means that I consider it to be more consistent.  The style guide says to
> use name spaced, object oriented style names, so ecore_exe_* and
> ECORE_EXE_* has to be the way to go.
> 
> I'll make these changes, but keep ECORE_EVENT_EXE_EXIT around for
> historical reasons (so no one can blame me for beaking evidence).

ok - though it depends how u look at the object ECORE_EVENT_* indicates it
belongs to ecore, is of a type events.. then sub type something else... it just
is a matter of which object is priority...



-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] Imlib not working under xorg-6.9?

2006-01-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:54:26 + (GMT) chinlu chinawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

> Hi,
> 
> I've ported xwindows from xfree4.4 towards to
> xorg-6.9, and seems to be working properly.
> 
> I did actually remove /usr/X11R6 and /etc/X11, so this
> is a fresh new server's installation.
> 
> The funny thing is that after this, imlib is no longer
> working on my computer. 
> 
> I've recompiled it, and it did it nicely, but when I
> try to execute again the example program, the Xlib
> version found in here:
> 
> http://www.enlightenment.org/Libraries/Imlib/index.html
> 
> It still doesn't show any images at all, as I've been
> trying with different formats. 
> 
> I've kept X loading same modules, and tried as well
> getting rid of those not actually found on my previous
> xfree server configuration, such as xcomposite.
> 
> Is this a bug?
> 
> Kind Regards,

errr. use imlib2 or Evas or something more modern... :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] ecore_exe event type consistancy.

2006-01-12 Thread dan sinclair

David Seikel wrote:

On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:50:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:35:42 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



i would argue that ECORE_EVENT_EXE is fine as its a CORE ecore event
(not a sub ecore system like ecore_con)... ?


I'm thinking consistency in naming things IPC related.  I think that
merging fork'n'pipe with ecore_ipc might be good, it's just another
IPC method, why should it be different?  Most of the ways of dealing
with it from the ecore users perspective are mostly similar.  Most of
the differences are simply due to current inconsistent naming and
lack of an exe add event.  The user doesn't see any core ecore / sub
ecore issues, it's all ecore_*_whatever to them.

As I said before, the naming of the exit event is historical, and I'm
prepared to wear that.  The data event is new though, and should be
consistent with other IPC data events.  It's semantics are the same,
hell most of the code was just cut'n'paste from ecore_con.



I've thought about it some more, and the fact that the ecore_exe
functions are all called ecore_exe_* like the "sub" ecore functions
means that I consider it to be more consistent.  The style guide says to
use name spaced, object oriented style names, so ecore_exe_* and
ECORE_EXE_* has to be the way to go.

I'll make these changes, but keep ECORE_EVENT_EXE_EXIT around for
historical reasons (so no one can blame me for beaking evidence).


Um, we haven't even had a release yet. Do we want to start carrying 
around depreciated apis?


dan


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] ecore_exe event type consistancy.

2006-01-12 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:31:03 -0500 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> David Seikel wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:50:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > I'll make these changes, but keep ECORE_EVENT_EXE_EXIT around for
> > historical reasons (so no one can blame me for beaking evidence).
> 
> Um, we haven't even had a release yet. Do we want to start carrying 
> around depreciated apis?

You are correct.  I just did a cvs update, autogen.sh, and make in my
evidence directory.  There was no updates from cvs, and it failed to
compile.  Thus I will no longer consider it important to avoid breaking
it.  This will be just one more thing to fix if anybody decides to
update evidence.


pgp7p1l4mrXlt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [E-devel] ecore_exe event type consistancy.

2006-01-12 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:31:03 -0500 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:

> David Seikel wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:50:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:35:42 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>i would argue that ECORE_EVENT_EXE is fine as its a CORE ecore event
> >>>(not a sub ecore system like ecore_con)... ?
> >>
> >>I'm thinking consistency in naming things IPC related.  I think that
> >>merging fork'n'pipe with ecore_ipc might be good, it's just another
> >>IPC method, why should it be different?  Most of the ways of dealing
> >>with it from the ecore users perspective are mostly similar.  Most of
> >>the differences are simply due to current inconsistent naming and
> >>lack of an exe add event.  The user doesn't see any core ecore / sub
> >>ecore issues, it's all ecore_*_whatever to them.
> >>
> >>As I said before, the naming of the exit event is historical, and I'm
> >>prepared to wear that.  The data event is new though, and should be
> >>consistent with other IPC data events.  It's semantics are the same,
> >>hell most of the code was just cut'n'paste from ecore_con.
> > 
> > 
> > I've thought about it some more, and the fact that the ecore_exe
> > functions are all called ecore_exe_* like the "sub" ecore functions
> > means that I consider it to be more consistent.  The style guide says to
> > use name spaced, object oriented style names, so ecore_exe_* and
> > ECORE_EXE_* has to be the way to go.
> > 
> > I'll make these changes, but keep ECORE_EVENT_EXE_EXIT around for
> > historical reasons (so no one can blame me for beaking evidence).
> 
> Um, we haven't even had a release yet. Do we want to start carrying 
> around depreciated apis?

i'm happy to have it move - if dave wants to do the sed work in cvs? :)

-- 
- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
裸好多
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
___
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


Re: [E-devel] ecore_exe event type consistancy.

2006-01-12 Thread David Seikel
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:00:20 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:31:03 -0500 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
> 
> > David Seikel wrote:
> > > On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:50:03 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'll make these changes, but keep ECORE_EVENT_EXE_EXIT around for
> > > historical reasons (so no one can blame me for beaking evidence).
> > 
> > Um, we haven't even had a release yet. Do we want to start carrying 
> > around depreciated apis?
> 
> i'm happy to have it move - if dave wants to do the sed work in
> cvs? :)

Doing it now.



pgpCvw5JAyyj0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-12 Thread phriedrich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Eric Sandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of
> eloquence installed. While compiling I get this error:
> gcc -shared  .libs/e_mod_main.o .libs/e_mod_config.o .libs/xmms.o
> .libs/bmp.o .libs/bmpx.o .libs/audacious.o .libs/amarok.o .libs/mpd.o
> - -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib /usr/lib/libgtk.so
> /usr/lib/libgdk.so /usr/lib/libgmodule.so /usr/lib/libglib.so -ldl
> - -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/lib/libxmms.so /usr/lib/libe.so
> - -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore/.libs
> - -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_txt/.libs
> - -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_job/.libs
> - -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_x/.libs
> - -L/usr/src/ecore-cvs/src/lib/ecore_con/.libs  -march=pentium4 -mmmx
> - -mfpmath=sse -msse -msse2 @dlopen_libs@ -Wl,-soname -Wl,module.so -o
> .libs/module.so
> gcc: @dlopen_libs@: No such file or directory
> make[2]: *** [module.la] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/eloquence-0.4.5/src'
> 
> - -sandalle

Mhm, difficult to say, I got it working on yesterday's CVS, look like it's
some automake/configure problem.

Please try the version from
http://www.phriedrich.artfact.at/eloquence.php

Best regards,
phriedrich


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature