[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 544 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 286 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80 python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7 284 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a1efc409a pure-ftpd-1.0.47-3.el7 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ebd7293594 python-pip-epel-8.1.2-12.el7 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-453d58e60f radare2-4.2.1-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-062fed623d php-horde-Horde-Data-2.1.5-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing spacenavd-0.7.1-1.el7 Details about builds: spacenavd-0.7.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-efe7e710f6) A free, compatible alternative for 3Dconnexion's input drivers Update Information: Bugfix release 0.7.1 fixed build on gcc 10 fixed configure script which failed to detect the version number correctly in release 0.7, incorrectly trying to rely on git to do so. Release 0.7 changelog: implemented the ability to log to syslog. ignore joystick devices when searching for USB devices (linux). added code to attempt to wrestle devices from the X server. added the new 3Dconnexion vendor id to the device matching logic. made builds reproducible by linking in alphabetical order. added option led = auto, to turn the LED on only when a client connects (linux). implemented a blacklist of USB device ids that should be ignored. ChangeLog: * Fri Feb 7 2020 Richard Shaw - 0.7.1-1 - Update to 0.7.1. * Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-11 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-10 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Feb 3 2019 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-9 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Jul 14 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Feb 9 2018 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-7 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Aug 3 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Feb 5 2016 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild * Fri Jun 19 2015 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.6-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: ClamAV - was Re: Question
Thanks for the info, and I'm cool with that. I only ask because freshclam issues a warning that it's out of date. Pete On 2/9/20 12:08 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: Is this the right list to ask about the status of ClamAV 0.102.1 and when it will be released? If this is not the right list please tell which list I to which I should direct this question. I don't have answers for that, but I would imagine this is the right place. FWIW, a similar question came up on the Fedora devel a few days ago, in relation to the release on 0.102.2 which fixes a DoS bug in clamd. That thread is here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/I5MP26TOBE433G22JG5CWHKNGM74CF5U/ It was noted that the security issues fixed in 0.102.2 only affects 0.102.x and that Fedora and EPEL remain on the 0.101.x series at the moment. That may be tangential to your question about an update to the 0.102.x series in general. But if you were worried particularly because of some security vulnerabilities, it might help you rest a little easier. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Question
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 06:19 -0500, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > Is this the right list to ask about the status of ClamAV 0.102.1 and > when it will be released? > If this is not the right list please tell which list I to which I > should direct this question. > Thanks I'm trying to update it, but my two mates don't agree with the move from freshclam to systemd [1] will I try start shipping clamav 0.102.1 , today . [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800226 > Pete > -- > Unencumbered by the thought process. > -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to > epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- Sérgio M. B. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: ClamAV - was Re: Question
Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > >> Is this the right list to ask about the status of ClamAV 0.102.1 and >> when it will be released? >> If this is not the right list please tell which list I to which I >> should direct this question. > > I don't have answers for that, but I would imagine this is the right place. FWIW, a similar question came up on the Fedora devel a few days ago, in relation to the release on 0.102.2 which fixes a DoS bug in clamd. That thread is here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/I5MP26TOBE433G22JG5CWHKNGM74CF5U/ It was noted that the security issues fixed in 0.102.2 only affects 0.102.x and that Fedora and EPEL remain on the 0.101.x series at the moment. That may be tangential to your question about an update to the 0.102.x series in general. But if you were worried particularly because of some security vulnerabilities, it might help you rest a little easier. -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] ClamAV - was Re: Question
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: Is this the right list to ask about the status of ClamAV 0.102.1 and when it will be released? If this is not the right list please tell which list I to which I should direct this question. I don't have answers for that, but I would imagine this is the right place. I note that ClamAV 0.102.2 was released on Tuesday 4 Feb. I've been trying to roll-my own for SL6, without success so far - SL7 and Centos8/EPEL8 should be easier. The on-access scanning in v0.102 works a little differently from v0.101 and needs libcurl >= 7.45 (and still needs a newer kernel than stock SL6). -- Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK and...@aitchison.me.uk___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Question
Is this the right list to ask about the status of ClamAV 0.102.1 and when it will be released? If this is not the right list please tell which list I to which I should direct this question. Thanks Pete -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
