[EPEL-devel] Re: Another Python macro backports for EPEL 8
Hi Miro, I was hoping someone more python oriented would look at this, but I guess that isn't happening. I'll take a look at it later today. On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:38 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, I've opened this PR some time ago: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/15 > > Who's the best person to ask for a review? > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Please clarify if EPEL8 need the scriptlets of Icon Cache, mimeinfo and Desktop databases
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:11 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > Guideline page needing clarification: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging > > Explanation > > in this wiki page is not clear that on EPEL8 we don't need anymore the > scriptlets of Icon Cache, mimeinfo and Desktop databases > Thank you for bringing this up. It looks like we need to go through that document and add a "EPEL 7" section. We'll leave everything that is still applicable on EPEL 8, and pull everything else into the EPEL 7 section. After taking a quick look, it looks like the sections you list would need to be in the EPEL7 section. To me, it also looks like "Shared Libraries" needs to be re-written, tweaked, or moved to EPEL 7. Troy ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Another Python macro backports for EPEL 8
On 19. 06. 20 16:03, Troy Dawson wrote: Hi Miro, I was hoping someone more python oriented would look at this, but I guess that isn't happening. I'll take a look at it later today. The Python oriented people already reviewed this in Fedora, here are similar F32/31 backports: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/60 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/61 If you want somebody from the Python team to review the code, I can ask a team member. What we don't know is whether our additions are appropriate for EPEL. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Another Python macro backports for EPEL 8
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:20 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 19. 06. 20 16:03, Troy Dawson wrote: > > Hi Miro, > > I was hoping someone more python oriented would look at this, but I > > guess that isn't happening. > > I'll take a look at it later today. > > The Python oriented people already reviewed this in Fedora, here are similar > F32/31 backports: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/60 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/61 > > If you want somebody from the Python team to review the code, I can ask a team > member. What we don't know is whether our additions are appropriate for EPEL. > For the three backported functions, I don't see any problem with those. For the pycached, looks like it's fixing a bug, so also I'm good with it. If other python people have looked at it, then that's good. Let me bring this up in the EPEL Steering Committee Meeting, which is in a couple hours. I suspect that since nobody has said anything, nobody objects. Just want to check. Troy ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: Another Python macro backports for EPEL 8
On 19. 06. 20 21:48, Troy Dawson wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:20 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 19. 06. 20 16:03, Troy Dawson wrote: Hi Miro, I was hoping someone more python oriented would look at this, but I guess that isn't happening. I'll take a look at it later today. The Python oriented people already reviewed this in Fedora, here are similar F32/31 backports: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/60 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-macros/pull-request/61 If you want somebody from the Python team to review the code, I can ask a team member. What we don't know is whether our additions are appropriate for EPEL. For the three backported functions, I don't see any problem with those. For the pycached, looks like it's fixing a bug, so also I'm good with it. If other python people have looked at it, then that's good. Let me bring this up in the EPEL Steering Committee Meeting, which is in a couple hours. I suspect that since nobody has said anything, nobody objects. Just want to check. Thanks. As a side note, the pycached bugfix is already part of epel7. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-5f91ab971e wordpress-5.1.6-1.el6 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-be517af396 tcpreplay-4.3.3-1.el6 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e982b1bb7c php-horde-horde-5.2.23-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing python-httplib2-0.18.1-1.el6 Details about builds: python-httplib2-0.18.1-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d2ea82902e) A comprehensive HTTP client library Update Information: 0.18.1 ChangeLog: * Fri Jun 19 2020 Gwyn Ciesla - 0.18.1-1 - 0.18.1 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1845941 - CVE-2020-11078 python-httplib2: CRLF injection via an attacker controlling unescaped part of uri for httplib2.Http.request function [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845941 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
