Re: EPEL moving epel 7 out of beta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/28/2014 04:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > Kevin and I working to move epel 7 out of beta, as of a few hours > ago builds require bodhi updates to get pushed out. you can now me > sure that all packages are signed. we are cleaning up the broken > deps in the repo and moving everything that has broken deps to > epel7-testing-candidate and they will need to have updates > created, making sure to deal with the broken deps. > > Additionaly this means that the wiki can no longer be used for > branch requests. that all needs to be done via bugzilla now. > > Thanks > > Dennis That's exciting news. :) Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT/6VBAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN+X0P/0Iic6KRhRISh1gWJMOXf4t+ 21M4pUzocCEX/LOSQ0FW1TPOMNLSRranWU4GHMdXhT4XOEEKYjEpotPlXHqz/ZR5 mJl/D6D8ljcrb4k/RPmN8Qu3+Dvtyd6aS0+yaDn0R5qPiQHIvp+iaXi7hDQURbdL czUoXfEJChrQY9SsapBUXxp38a9M9rN3l4Gcm/vNbnlZhZV2DjP2uTQtKZ2WVIM8 0bVpoTq2+jzA4eZm0oVJjnqKLaRnP2Gjp2pMhRRTY7NGoRcdFEl5CY10sEb7jrdl NabuXaCbpS4Po5N8xo35cn4t+i5A3CL/VL1l5ieL32a/O2lc6bjQ25oBHpmkm0Nl 6LyrIVKcDf6nyHM56z0ysQtLO5dtXyFVXM+LPj2716jTMWwx4c9yzTG/D5JDp/4y C/0fz+zpny7Lscs3G3TWJmNgT2YBNv7qIkWNQpsb5iJQgyG71KtUb5J5vyZ/DJiq 9LXRZnSwbuIvFYaDzhNYoDgQQXOS8zXxmrZelyVh57ONWistW1lQqcdd+FRy3RBN YkuLqAoRSKoL4L+Bt3MxM3wSSDsHnHdpDlLvPMFKYufDAiFWieVjYTl/yl/QdevW kefVF1ghm07zlQ/YJlGjtJOGFO8ksQSRNROSHTkVg0cbmw4rNsF92alg+tstTjon 09iHZqmKRmAuqqQ1DOEB =/3B+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL Proposed meeting: Fri Aug 22 16:00:00 UTC 2014
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/14/2014 06:51 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I am proposing that the EPEL community hold a meeting in #epel on > Friday August 22, 2014 16:00:00 UTC to go over various community > items: > Thanks for organizing this meeting. Unfortunately, I will be at my work at this time. I will make sure to read the meeting minutes/logs and come back here with concerns, if any. Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT7/XwAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNjekQAKvsHK62NseBI9SqpClZBn/5 /5nK3fuEUmiosE+JumebhnkLoY22Qo2f99AliEMXDtt/BBKD92pA6y4VaN9v56RT np8mCxyHwa7n4qbICbhQRm6ZeXABXezxJhaos4L2Jeun2mbm6S6q4Auq2/zglACX d71wL8wF9y8/inS6epj55U39lFxtuDEMp2xdm/QZJ7fyjUXzlmUeHK81d3a+5hRd fVbyaVS/e4M77r/HMVdtXXaR07wJFBqeICCiHEiuSjbYN2P3VoNWDE0LfsEV6fIs CtVA7oaeEX2+8L82C51E9evMYIi3/DUlZy0qCLRlxSwHl9eBTNC8jrmDhr4YBhyD 842es1DyLEK4zfSV7qEC2d8S7KmElUXfOvy00Z3QYOT4C8NkAohKIhR+3bmRy+Ye 9hdqLUZuHl7u8v36pXhuzapvVw+DcGA2G1ELVcHivRScgY+prFh1/TAojNzPoHaX ruhxHeQwoLtleOwCT4DxNE4OhAA9JAD7PxlTqyAwPx0XXoJitKetytezHuWa4U16 G15JmKyfB9D8trvh2tiNnj8feovUtkY5kehnICltQg6edd4CJSceCPO3VQ+H/+4a sZmmKi0WxTjmqwazSE+beYzHRr6Nq7TRGrO6RYxu2Xb16uNZk1W+ZQv5o2JHjUyM iLlmH9IF3yHcrPzj6Zbg =qLtQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/15/2014 10:02 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: >> > If I recall correctly (it's been a while since I last touched this > package), the -gnome and -compat packages are used to provide > default desktop backgrounds for Fedora's Gnome (-gnome one) and > XFCE, LXDE a others (the -compat one, via > /usr/share/backgrounds/default.png). I don't think this package is > desirable on EPEL. -basic (this or it's equivalent should be in > RHEL already) and -waves are both old and rusty, there's no need > for them either. > > Regards, Martin Yup! That's the purpose of -compat packages. I have not had the chance to start a discussion on that - but I guess here we go. There are two *backgrounds packages in EPEL/EL stream as far as I can tell. * gnome-backgrounds * mate-backgrounds I suppose we could use gnome-backgrounds ... Kevin? - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTxeJUAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN+KEP/2MXmsL5RvXSwMAkKX/LWEDi AseNYT8HPQHlYzn8YHTwN/ck0FFsU9DIKr7KgXzS5hkPB5tWwcCiyZ7JBrGjClPk rF+dk1l/CmVUqo6cwO4E3tT2xjbt/hN58MMWwsx1cxbX1TDviBeubqrNdnZ08iXh bHlEcvdY/16Qiy0NnH4mUcJryajOldVE+GIqLy/M4AeZBPUhDZNCjBSRMXgoSy7x DploNCUD4q315qqHtIS+3sGbyPD9ScC1DLSBXvfcAsiCojfVnJf9U7OIYd4W/rkQ 8fmE0n1yHCAMt/0mpZEWxYCAy4Bzs76YHFjcEI9amgF3j8gBR6hvWOwiHz9FArjn Ufq0K9JPBKXpWD/aMf+X6cXQP6ITPUNBGb9RKlhTI+gDg2Ngr+tPlAjw6MJqTaJT OmIKk1sjASkx6syroyk7ZQ63dxOsBY+ILsaiKz4sdQqhlu+pL/h5wSutUTMD0XKB YhPw562y5Kgm2ZiEW+sxVJOfIZeuX82Scq93hi5eW7YIYOiPH+7M24TIpDzxBjkj WBtzgN4NYm+brP5KhJ73PCfocmV2EiSoxZFKHQStQlo6TjMuPiPxCtdj7L/YqOov QBsu27EoK1xPUfKxFbz3u6tnqQZtOGQfqhyt4mKHnhrocdYwXjjnV3PAri4F+WIB n9Q/QLf3x87QSkU0jVwJ =Zn8I -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/14/2014 01:34 AM, Suse Shi wrote: > thanks Christopher, > > yes the links works fine, also the xfdesktop package: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 > > > thanks a lot for the link, I just saw it. well, I cost some time > to build manually based on following RPMs. > > Thunar-1.6.3-2.fc20.src.rpm xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.fc20.src.rpm > > > > into following RPMs, simply it works, too. > > [root@localhost ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64]$ls -altr total 3920 > drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 19 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1290680 > Thunar-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root > 167856 Thunar-devel-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 > root root 1384024 Thunar-debuginfo-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 712116 > xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root > 448924 xfdesktop-debuginfo-4.10.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm > > > > I think Devs may need some extra work to build dependencies of > these package onto @xfce. > > > > Thanks, suse > Thank you for testing out the Xfce packages on EPEL-7. As Kevin mentioned, not everything for Xfce is built yet. I have only built some of the packages belonging to Xfce DE and I intend to add more soon. As you can probably see from pkgdb, not all packages have epel-7 branches yet and I have already contacted the owner(s) of the said packages in this regard. I will setup a COPR repo for some packages as soon as I have them ready. It's not difficult but just that I have to get around to setting them up (which will happen this week). Thanks! Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTxHWQAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNkB0QAKrrHKzwAYW91SKgUBC5tM8Q X56Iz1tbXWMIah19gPNUd2Oel9lGBv/iFZvwKQAZDQPc6aE4gEPPRdR0xKFkbd8k Eof2JYgTsDdesLq5qB3sQTH7g9O/EpuMLtS8mBt8BuRduutOjnK4m9qPJGGO8sJm /NHrlLdNUK50Px4TGSOoi1OsZsYbDfBFpLiO01cNT/N+i4/5V769F+KoffZ4AgNh lfTsqMKjJhxPXRl48XmNjAul1xfBj1dCwkb5PZ7tII+Mj682ZS14d+sPNsreB9AZ lS78x6WLhGJwjXQIlGWVmCx1HF9+ySWYU6IdlOcnhbAhqeeD3ExxFmjMiR8LJd2l zX6XQYsB/WhKrN7IU6N2d4mja9xZvIb3jUW3NG8pNtvmQZdVTthlcy56pcRhIUOU qj7N8+2xk66ae9/JsOQqr3nsYRHVowepQM0yZiGsDzVLAztNxXmHinE/ZFlQ30E/ 8P+tytAPRsToMdr1Q9IkCBN7XR1G9hMtv/jnjUuvloJG6ND+qAJpp/6keGQdRl3i xiFnAc64U1cev963jO7QUBIX3HdZET0ofM5Pm/2FLoxXtbQiZBucLuByJTbSIGCs Ayx+FTIkI32MPcKpDN4O1ee+pxCHE2PYkJDIwj2+LQhSsY8HpBcd1BavOqzKXfWG E9adhLdRHY41krogA2Hm =UXwx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
