[EPEL-devel] Re: argbash
On 8/9/20 4:19 AM, Tom Yates wrote: On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Troy Dawson wrote: The correct procedure for getting a package into EPEL 8 is to open a bugzilla[1] requesting it. That way it will go to the package maintainer. sorry to ask idiot questions, but what's the correct procedure for opening a bugzilla to request a package in EPEL when the component (specifically, rcs) isn't listed because prior to RHEL8 it was in core RHEL? Then file it in the Fedora product. -- Orion Poplawski Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: argbash
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Troy Dawson wrote: The correct procedure for getting a package into EPEL 8 is to open a bugzilla[1] requesting it. That way it will go to the package maintainer. sorry to ask idiot questions, but what's the correct procedure for opening a bugzilla to request a package in EPEL when the component (specifically, rcs) isn't listed because prior to RHEL8 it was in core RHEL? -- Tom Yates - https://www.teaparty.net ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Re: argbash
The correct procedure for getting a package into EPEL 8 is to open a bugzilla[1] requesting it. That way it will go to the package maintainer. I did a quick look and it should be fairly easy for the maintainer to create the package. It looks like they updated argbash across all platforms, including EPEL8. So it's built, but they didn't do the process that actually put's it into EPEL8. So, I'm betting if you file a bug requesting it, they will be willing to do that one extra step and get it in. Troy [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 1:57 PM Richard G wrote: > > Any chance of getting argbash into epel8? The epel7 spec file seems > to build OK... > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
