Re: meeting notes for march 2016?

[John Lenz]

great, I was expecting an announcement here.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Michael Ficarra  wrote:

> The notes have already been posted at
> https://github.com/tc39/tc39-notes/tree/4d5fb147e6b714f682aaf5da803ca14ec5fb3b82/es7/2016-03
> .
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:45 AM, John Lenz  wrote:
>
>> Any update on this?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rick Waldron 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Where are they? I haven't seen anyone post them for approval.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM Jordan Harband  wrote:
>>>
 The notes were taken, but have not yet been approved and posted on
 https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes .

 On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă <
 raul.miha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anybody managed to take meeting notes during the last meeting? If
> so, can they please share them? Thank you!
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
 ___
 es-discuss mailing list
 es-discuss@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

>>>
>>> ___
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shape Security is hiring outstanding individuals. Check us out at 
> *https://shapesecurity.com/jobs/
> *
>
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Function#toString revision: JSDoc comments?

[Garrett Smith]

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Caitlin Potter  wrote:
> How would that interact with angular.js' Function.prototype.toString
> parsing? Seems like doing that could break some content, even if it were
> useful
>
Comments are generally a failure of the developer to write self
explanatory code.

The proposal to break Angular.JS by having Function.prototype.toString
result in preceeding comments could send a message of not relying on
Function decompilation (we went over this in 2005; a dead horse), but
it won't happen.

Because although code in the wild (for the web) cannot reasonably
expect Function.prototype.toString to produce anything other than a
string for which eval will throw a SyntaxError, implementations try to
meet the unreasonable demands imposed by these libraries and their
hapless users (the coders who use Angular in their source code, not
the end user).

Not only does it contradict existing spec (something the Angular.js
developers obviously didn't bother to read), but it changes what
browsers actually do, and if it means breaking the web, browsers won't
do that. Even if the vast majority of content served in conjunction
with Angular is not useful.

Thank you,

-- 
Garrett
Guitar Videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY_uK9hur86KEuiG8s7yvWw
@xkit
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Re: New Assignment Operators (Not bit-wise OR)

[Brandon Andrews]

Perhaps this proposal might fit with what you had in mind:


https://esdiscuss.org/topic/proposal-for-a-null-coalescing-operator

Been meaning to clean this up and submit it as an actual proposal since the 
idea is kind of simple:

https://github.com/sirisian/ecmascript-null-coalescing-operator
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: meeting notes for march 2016?

[Michael Ficarra]

The notes have already been posted at
https://github.com/tc39/tc39-notes/tree/4d5fb147e6b714f682aaf5da803ca14ec5fb3b82/es7/2016-03
.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:45 AM, John Lenz  wrote:

> Any update on this?
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rick Waldron 
> wrote:
>
>> Where are they? I haven't seen anyone post them for approval.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM Jordan Harband  wrote:
>>
>>> The notes were taken, but have not yet been approved and posted on
>>> https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes .
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă <
>>> raul.miha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Has anybody managed to take meeting notes during the last meeting? If
 so, can they please share them? Thank you!

 ___
 es-discuss mailing list
 es-discuss@mozilla.org
 https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss


>>> ___
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>


-- 
Shape Security is hiring outstanding individuals. Check us out at
*https://shapesecurity.com/jobs/
*
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: meeting notes for march 2016?

[John Lenz]

Any update on this?

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rick Waldron  wrote:

> Where are they? I haven't seen anyone post them for approval.
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM Jordan Harband  wrote:
>
>> The notes were taken, but have not yet been approved and posted on
>> https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes .
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă <
>> raul.miha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anybody managed to take meeting notes during the last meeting? If
>>> so, can they please share them? Thank you!
>>>
>>> ___
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>>
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss