Penrose Singularity Predicts The End of Space Time

2020-11-17 Thread Alan Grayson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4odQd8q3xY

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c98a4018-01be-4742-a8d4-86d3cf68853an%40googlegroups.com.


Re: Pfizer says COVID-19 vaccine over 90% effective

2020-11-17 Thread PGC


On Monday, November 9, 2020 at 8:53:28 PM UTC+1 Kim Jones wrote:

> Is this the John Clark special news service? Does John Clark believe that 
> without his announcement nobody would know about this? 
>

There's nothing that prevents any list participants from starting more 
focussed or exclusive discussion groups, even ones bearing this name, with 
rules of participation and entry, standards, moderators etc. I can 
understand the impulse to want to separate the list's discussion from the 
conventional beat of mainstream news drums. 

Far from wanting to impose some utilitarian imperative, yours truly 
appreciates the posts and content that in some way, shape, or form; from 
ensemble theories to descriptions and reports on the context, which they 
seek to describe... Reference a commitment to future world building, that 
is at least weakly discernible. It's fun to read which theoretical setups 
people prefer to describe the world, with or without ontological 
engagements. But what kind of world building we'd find on the other side of 
some descriptive-explanatory package - or arguments relating to 
demonstrating no connection at all - be such a package theoretical, 
ontological, or otherwise; do not seem off-topic entirely.

For example some kind of outlook with bearing on survival and 
sustainability such as:

https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020

Not that I'd endorse such... but to see such issues be completely 
disconnected from discussions relating to ensemble theories, would weigh 
more favorably towards Wittgenstein's "tempests in philosophical/academic 
teapots" argument and carry a cynical aftertaste imho, that seems less 
compatible with the drive that nourishes scientific inquiry. Because "why 
seek inquiry in scientific terms at all?", right? Therefore outlook, albeit 
gently and a sprinkle of breathable air and semi-digestible fibrous 
potential. PGC 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f1a27e81-7ed8-436f-ac11-f0dd0e7793d5n%40googlegroups.com.