A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron. =. Electron isn’t a point. Electron has a geometrical form. Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm. Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin. Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas: Plank: h=Et, Einstein: h=kb, Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi. The speed of photon is minimal : c=1. The speed of electron is c>1 Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same particle in different conditions. =. Question: Where did electron come from? Answer: Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K. =. All the best. Israel Socratus ===. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
On May 5, 12:17 am, "socra...@bezeqint.net" wrote: > A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron. > =. > Electron isn’t a point. > Electron has a geometrical form. Maybe not. Maybe we infer geometry because of measurement using geometric instruments. > Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm. Which would be the case if that form wasn't literally an object. > Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin. When we stimulate matter in particular ways, it changes our instrument's detection (vicarious imitation) of that stimulation. > Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas: > Plank: h=Et, > Einstein: h=kb, > Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi. > The speed of photon is minimal : c=1. > The speed of electron is c>1 > Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same > particle in different conditions. Or different moods of atoms or even molecules. > =. > Question: > Where did electron come from? > Answer: > Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K. > =. Why not from Kingdom of Difference? T= perception(0K↔∞K) Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
Electron’s fine structure constant. =. It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula: a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is fine structure constant: 1/137 Feynman expressed (a ) quantity as ‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘. But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity, it is only part of formula of an electron: e^2=h*ca . The constant {a} is only one of three constants which belong to the formula of electron: e^2=h*ca. (a), (c), (h*) are three constants which created the electron. And if we don’t know (a) then we don’t know what electron is. Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 different models of electron. For example. The book "What is the Electron?" Volodimir Simulik Montreal, Canada. 2005. / In this book: ‘ More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. (!!!) More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!) Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.’ ftp://210.45.114.81/physics/%CA%E9%BC%AE/What%20Is%20the%20Electron%20by%20Volodimir%20Simulik%20.pdf All of these models are problematical. We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics. But how can we trust them if we don’t know what electron is. And somebody wrote: If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics: "why do we study some many particles? Understand really what is an electron would be enough." . . . ‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key to finding the origin of the natural laws.’ =. By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and then to study the far away spaces and another particles. =. Best withes. Israel Sadovnik Socratus ==. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
What is the electron configuration ? Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology? http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf ==. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
Re: A crazy thoughts about structure of Electron.
# A New Limit on Photon Mass. http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html ===. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.