Re: Pre-established harmony comp in relation to Platonia and Contingia

2012-09-30 Thread Alberto G. Corona
Thanks for the very interesting video.

Concerning Platonia and Contingia, there are much to say if we introduce
natural selection, the only well know creative process.

The world of Platonia, in terms of natural selection, is the peak of the
fitness landscape (FT).  The FT is the point of perfection from which the
living form, or the living behaviour can not be improved.   Contingia is
the world of extinction by random, imprevisible events. When contingia
enters,the most filnely adapted beings perish due to their specialization,
and gives the world to generalists, good in nothing, bacterias, fungi and
  adapted of fortune that casually are adapted to the disaster scenario:
scavengers, tunnel diggers, shallow water habitants etc.  None of them are
beatiful.  But extinction gives a opportunity to new perfect forms that are
better than the former. If there would be no extinction, we would still be
bacterias.

This creative destruction appears also in the market, (That is a controlled
darwinian process under State laws). and in general in any creative process.

The perfect forms inhabit our mind because we have to measure ourselves
against the ideal. Beauty is a measure of closeness to the ideal. I´m
persuaded for example that the beauty of movements of a dancer is related
with the use of energy for a given movement. the less energy the dancer
use, the more beautiful is the movement. And we perceive this use of energy
as smooth and beatiful movement because to mate or to be a friend of a good
 user of his energies (by a good neurocoordination) has been crucial for
survial. A good dancer is in the peak of fitness landscape in energy usage,
so he exhibit it. And Platonia in our mind know it.

There are evolutonary explanations for many others notons of beauty.

As Penrose said the motor of this process of evolution and life  is the
gradient of entropy. The photosyntesis is a capture of energy that requires
the building of a chemical (and phisical) infrastructure that requires
information processing, from genes to phenotype building programs to
reproduction and so on.   And only in a positive gradient of entrophy this
processing is 
possiblehttp://www.google.es/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=ssource=webcd=3cad=rjaved=0CC8QFjACurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Fagcorona1%2Farrow-of-time-determined-by-lthe-easier-direction-of-computation-for-lifeei=kz1oUNjjIJCxhAesjIDgAgusg=AFQjCNGhgf10g4gWWodpK-QwcKptsdCWTwsig2=LEWaQzY5cTrUV1I8wkA7bQfor
living beings.



 I would also like to suggest that the pre-established harmony (PEH)
 of Leibniz is more complex but still acts as Leibniz intended,
 while one might apply traditional cosmological concepts to it.
 Perhaps someone with more physics (and brains) than I
 could use this to roughly specify what the PEH is.
 In the traditional understanding it would simply be the
 decay of order into disorder. Note that Penrose has
 looked recently into the issue of how large the entropy
 can get. See the series starting at

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ-D5AUGVcI

 I believe that entropy begins to eventually
 diminish as gravity.

 It may be that comp and the Turing machine have analogous
 behaviors.




 Have received the following content -
 Sender: Roger Clough
 Receiver: everything-list
 Time: 2012-09-29, 04:18:28
 Subject: Platonia and Contingia



 Platonia and Contingia

 We are all somewhat familiar with Platonia,
 the Platonic source of order in the world.

 I suggest that there must also be Contingia,
 that being our contingent, everyday world, which,
 following Boltzmann and the concept of entropy,
 is the source of disorder.

 I would also like to suggest that Platonic causation
 is goal-oriented, also referred to by Aristotle as end causation,
 and favors life, while in Contingia, causation is that of
 everyday determinism, which tends to create disorder,
 entropy, decay and death.

 Then there will always be two opposing forces, one
 of order (Platonia) and one of disorder or entropy (Contingia).




 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
 9/29/2012
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.




-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: Pre-established harmony comp in relation to Platonia and Contingia

2012-09-30 Thread Stephen P. King

On 9/30/2012 8:43 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:

Thanks for the very interesting video.


Hi Alberto,

I agree. Roger Penrose is one of my favorite theorists.



Concerning Platonia and Contingia, there are much to say if we 
introduce natural selection, the only well know creative process.


The world of Platonia, in terms of natural selection, is the peak of 
the fitness landscape (FT).  The FT is the point of perfection from 
which the living form, or the living behaviour can not be improved.   
Contingia is the world of extinction by random, imprevisible events. 
When contingia enters,the most filnely adapted beings perish due to 
their specialization, and gives the world to generalists, good in 
nothing, bacterias, fungi and   adapted of fortune that casually are 
adapted to the disaster scenario: scavengers, tunnel diggers, shallow 
water habitants etc.  None of them are beatiful.  But extinction gives 
a opportunity to new perfect forms that are better than the former. If 
there would be no extinction, we would still be bacterias.


A very good point! One of my constant complaints is that the 
Selection aspect of evolution is grossly neglected in discussions of it.




This creative destruction appears also in the market, (That is a 
controlled darwinian process under State laws). and in general in any 
creative process.


Yes, it is the tendency to select an outcome from a domain of 
many possible outcomes. Mathematically, it resembles a many-to-one 
mapping function. Mutation, in evolutionary models, can be seen 
mathematically as a one-to-many mapping function. It is interesting to 
me that these two mapping functions are the inverse or dual of each 
other. I think that this feature can be used to mathematically model 
evolution.




The perfect forms inhabit our mind because we have to measure 
ourselves against the ideal. Beauty is a measure of closeness to the 
ideal. I´m persuaded for example that the beauty of movements of a 
dancer is related with the use of energy for a given movement. the 
less energy the dancer use, the more beautiful is the movement. And we 
perceive this use of energy as smooth and beatiful movement because to 
mate or to be a friend of a good  user of his energies (by a good 
neurocoordination) has been crucial for survial. A good dancer is in 
the peak of fitness landscape in energy usage, so he exhibit it. And 
Platonia in our mind know it.


There are evolutonary explanations for many others notons of beauty.

As Penrose said the motor of this process of evolution and life  is 
the gradient of entropy. The photosyntesis is a capture of energy that 
requires the building of a chemical (and phisical) infrastructure that 
requires information processing, from genes to phenotype building 
programs to reproduction and so on. And only in a positive gradient of 
entrophy this processing is possible 
http://www.google.es/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=ssource=webcd=3cad=rjaved=0CC8QFjACurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Fagcorona1%2Farrow-of-time-determined-by-lthe-easier-direction-of-computation-for-lifeei=kz1oUNjjIJCxhAesjIDgAgusg=AFQjCNGhgf10g4gWWodpK-QwcKptsdCWTwsig2=LEWaQzY5cTrUV1I8wkA7bQ 
for living beings.


It might be that living being are, as an equivalence class, all 
the possible structures that can process gradients of entropy for the 
purpose of generated their structure.






 I would also like to suggest that the pre-established harmony (PEH)
 of Leibniz is more complex but still acts as Leibniz intended,
 while one might apply traditional cosmological concepts to it.
 Perhaps someone with more physics (and brains) than I
 could use this to roughly specify what the PEH is.
 In the traditional understanding it would simply be the
 decay of order into disorder. Note that Penrose has
 looked recently into the issue of how large the entropy
 can get. See the series starting at

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ-D5AUGVcI

 I believe that entropy begins to eventually
 diminish as gravity.

 It may be that comp and the Turing machine have analogous
 behaviors.



snip



--
Onward!

Stephen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Pre-established harmony comp in relation to Platonia and Contingia

2012-09-29 Thread Roger Clough

Pre-established harmony  comp in relation to Platonia and Contingia

I would also like to suggest that the pre-established harmony (PEH)
of Leibniz is more complex but still acts as Leibniz intended,
while one might apply traditional cosmological concepts to it.
Perhaps someone with more physics (and brains) than I
could use this to roughly specify what the PEH is.
In the traditional understanding it would simply be the
decay of order into disorder. Note that Penrose has
looked recently into the issue of how large the entropy
can get. See the series starting at

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJ-D5AUGVcI

I believe that entropy begins to eventually
diminish as gravity. 

It may be that comp and the Turing machine have analogous
behaviors. 




Have received the following content -  
Sender: Roger Clough  
Receiver: everything-list  
Time: 2012-09-29, 04:18:28 
Subject: Platonia and Contingia 



Platonia and Contingia  

We are all somewhat familiar with Platonia, 
the Platonic source of order in the world.  

I suggest that there must also be Contingia, 
that being our contingent, everyday world, which, 
following Boltzmann and the concept of entropy, 
is the source of disorder. 

I would also like to suggest that Platonic causation 
is goal-oriented, also referred to by Aristotle as end causation, 
and favors life, while in Contingia, causation is that of 
everyday determinism, which tends to create disorder, 
entropy, decay and death. 

Then there will always be two opposing forces, one 
of order (Platonia) and one of disorder or entropy (Contingia).  




Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net  
9/29/2012  
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.