Hi John Clark
I would call that reacting.
But you're welcome to call it causal.
I believe that you should know all of the factors involved
before calling something causal.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
9/3/2012
Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him
so that everything could function."
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-01, 13:39:26
Subject: Re: While computers are causal, life is not causal.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
?> While?omputers are causal
Yes.
> perception is not causal. Nothing that living things do is causal.
Nothing??? So when you're running and perceive a brick wall directly in front
of you getting larger by the second that perception has nothing to do with you
stopping just before you hit the wall. If "nothing" about living things is
causal there would be no point in having sense organs, in fact there would be
no point in having organs of any sort because they wouldn't operate.
? John K Clark? ?
?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
