Re: [Evolution] Problems with LDAP to MS Exchange server in Evolution 1.2
Try this: begin- ?xml version=1.0? addressbooks contactserver nameexchangeusername/name description/ port389/port hostmailserver/host rootdn/ scopesub/scope authmethodnone/authmethod /contactserver /addressbooks --end--- On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:29, Matt Larson wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 13:21, Chris Toshok wrote: You can run wombat in its own terminal (run killev then start wombat then run evolution as normal.) That should produce some debug output (specifically the filters used and the ldap search response.) OK, I got wombat to stay running, but the output isn't particularly helpful: chinook:~ $ wombat wombat-Message: Starting wombat Wombat up and running backend_last_client_gone_cb() called! backend_last_client_gone_cb() called! wombat-pas-Message: libldap vendor/version: OpenLDAP 2.00.11 wombat-pas-Message: extensions present: wombat-pas-Message: X_OPENLDAP wombat-pas-Message: X_OPENLDAP_V2_REFERRALS wombat-pas-WARNING **: unhandled value for use_tls, not using it wombat-pas-Message: supported server control: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.319 wombat-pas-Message: supported server control: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.417 wombat-pas-Message: supported server control: 1.2.840.113556.1.4.529 searching server using filter: ( (|(cn=Larson*)(sn=Larson*)) ) wombat-pas-WARNING **: search returned 0 I've verified that my LDAP server does return data for this query, e.g. this URL works fine in IE: ldap://servername/o=VERISIGN??sub?(%20(|(cn=Larson*)(sn=Larson*))%20) That's cutting and pasting the exact query that wombat says evolution sent (and for which wombat says search returned 0). I have configured my LDAP server in evolution with the same DN (o=VERISIGN) as the URL above and for a sub search, just like the URL. I'm afraid I still suspect evolution. Has anyone else made evolution talk to an MS Exchange LDAP server? Thanks for any help, Matt -- Matt Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] VeriSign Global Registry Services ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Open-Pc, Inc.
Especially with RH 8 shipping with EVO! On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 14:14, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 14:33, Bob Haddleton wrote: On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 13:22, Morgan wrote: Hi all: FYI, Open-Pc, Inc. just opened for business online. Open-Pc, Inc is a linux shop providing pre installed desktops, notebooks, and servers. Pre-installed default OS is Red Hat 8 that also comes with Evolution. So how ironic is it that a Linux shop shipping RH8 with Evolution is using MS Outlook as an email client and sending mail with ms-tnef attachments? Glad I'm not the only one chuckling :-) Jeff -- Bob Haddleton ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Evolution and OpenLDAP: POSSIBLE RESOLUTION?
Recently a co-worker installed evo 1.1.1.99 beta. I've been running it for a long time now. He was able to browse our Exchange 5.5 with no hassles, I was still unable, even after deleting most of the xml files. I took a copy of his addressbook-sources.xml and compared it against mine. His works, mine doesn't. The only major difference is the authentication type. Here is an example: -new xml- contactserver nameaustin/name description/ port389/port hostmail.somehost.com/host rootdn/ scopesub/scope authmethodnone/authmethod /contactserver -new xml- -old xml- contactserver nameaustin/name description/ port389/port hostmail.somehost.com/host rootdn/ scopeone/scope authmethodldap/simple-binddn/authmethod sslnever/ssl binddnaustin/binddn /contactserver -old xml- The latter entry fails and asks for authentication over and over, while the former just works, after I've authenticated to the exchange server. I wanted to open a bug on this, but I don't want this hole to get closed per se so I can't use LDAP at all, rather I would like the latter to be fixed so it does work. TIA -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Evolution and OpenLDAP: POSSIBLE RESOLUTION?
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 12:33, Dieter Kluenter wrote: Hi, The latter entry fails and asks for authentication over and over, while the former just works, after I've authenticated to the exchange server. No, in this case, I can only search ldap if authenticated to the IMAP store. Otherwise, it spits at me. Dunno how that's happening, but it is pretty consistent. That depends on the authentication method, your ldap server is probabely requiring strong authentication and evolution is not able to handle strong authentication yet. Nope, not strong. I wanted to open a bug on this, but I don't want this hole to get closed per se so I can't use LDAP at all, rather I would like the latter to be fixed so it does work. That is not a bug in evolution but a matter of your ldap server's access configuration. Not really, I've worked with our admin for quite a bit on this, and it's pretty secure, well, from an accountability perspective. -Dieter -- Dieter Kluenter | Systemberatung Tel:040.64861967 | Fax: 040.64891521 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.schevolution.com/tour ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Evolution and OpenLDAP: POSSIBLE RESOLUTION?
I dunno really what the case is, but I want to know if this sounds like enough of a bug to go ahead and just get it logged so someone more knowledgable than I can actually look at it, or look at it with my help, etc. On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 14:17, Tony Earnshaw wrote: ons, 2002-10-09 kl. 19:33 skrev Dieter Kluenter: The latter entry fails and asks for authentication over and over, while the former just works, after I've authenticated to the exchange server. That depends on the authentication method, your ldap server is probabely requiring strong authentication and evolution is not able to handle strong authentication yet. I wanted to open a bug on this, but I don't want this hole to get closed per se so I can't use LDAP at all, rather I would like the latter to be fixed so it does work. Dieter, You've written all that to help some poor b*gg*r whilst your conclusion is completely wrong: That is not a bug in evolution but a matter of your ldap server's access configuration. It's a rotten, filthy, great big bug in Evolution which stops Evolution ever competing with Microsoft Outlook and it's all Ximian's fault (no Ximian names, no Ximian pack drill.) There is namely *nothing* wrong with the server, or any other Exchange server, it follows rfcs et sequitur to the letter. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw There are many people who can't face the truth ... If you rob a normal person of life's lies, at the same time you'll be robbing him of his happiness. From Henrik Ibsen's Vildanden, The wild Duck. e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Other Contacts not working with latest 1.1.99?
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 16:14, Austin Gonyou wrote: Since upgrading to the more recent snapshot of (yesterday and today) I click on my ldap directory in other contacts and it will not stay selected. Error messages I get from the console are evolution-shell-WARNING **: e_folder_type_registry_get_icon_for_type() -- Unknown type `ldap-contacts' What do I need to do to fix this? Just delete the *.xmls in my evolution dir? -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Problem with some MIME encodings?
Thanks for the update. I'm happy to know it's all good. I think it's working properly after updating the latest snaps. On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 18:57, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: This was a bug in an imap optimisation patch I committed, anyways - this bug was fixed late last night (apparently after the snaps were built). The next snapshot will fix this issue, although you may have to rm -rf the cache files for the affected messages. Jeff On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 18:28, Austin Gonyou wrote: I'm using RH 7.2, Evo 1.1.1.99 snapshots. This is what I get in several messages after upgrading using today's snapshots. mailsource Could not parse MIME message. Displaying as source. --_=_NextPart_001_01C26028.19B29ED0-- /mailsource -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Problem with some MIME encodings?
I'm using RH 7.2, Evo 1.1.1.99 snapshots. This is what I get in several messages after upgrading using today's snapshots. mailsource Could not parse MIME message. Displaying as source. --_=_NextPart_001_01C26028.19B29ED0-- /mailsource -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution] Multipart Mime message not working.
I've a multipart mime message that's been floating around in an email thread internally but there seems to be no data in it for EVO to parse. Outlook works fine with the messages, but I can't seem to see what's changed. I didn't have any problems yesterday with that snapshot of 1.1.1.99. Todays seems to have broken this somehow. -- Austin Gonyou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coremetrics, Inc. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] Active Directory LDAP browsing using Evolution. Help if you can!
Can anyone tell me how to use Evo 1.1 to browse an Active Directory LDAP server, or point me to some documentation that talks about using ldapsearch on an Active Directory LDAP box? I just cannot get my contacts configured at all. Everything I do Evo gives me the same two messages. One about the URI defined is not valid. Another about Invalid Credentials. I took the LDAP information from outlook, and plugged that into ldap search, and I get the same thing, but only Invalid Credentials, or no such attribute, but never URI defined is not valid. please help! -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Active Directory LDAP browsing using Evolution. Help if you can!
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 14:29, Dan Winship wrote: (toshok: read the end at least) --snip-- Now, having said all that, it seems that there's a bug in the code right now... if you set Search scope to Sub, it gets saved as Base instead, and so it doesn't work. But if you quit evolution and edit ~/evolution/addressbook-sources.xml by hand to fix that, it should work. -- Dan NP. I will try thanks much! -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Active Directory LDAP browsing using Evolution. Help if you can!
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 14:29, Dan Winship wrote: (toshok: read the end at least) On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 14:56, Austin Gonyou wrote: Can anyone tell me how to use Evo 1.1 to browse an Active Directory LDAP server General pane: * Server name: your server * Log in method: Using distinguished name (DN) * Distinguished name: DOMAIN\username All good here. Connecting: Port 389, nothing else for now. * Search scope: Sub Yep. Now, having said all that, it seems that there's a bug in the code right now... if you set Search scope to Sub, it gets saved as Base instead, and so it doesn't work. But if you quit evolution and edit ~/evolution/addressbook-sources.xml by hand to fix that, it should work. Didn't get bit by this one..but I modified it by hand anyway to make sure. The message I receive, no matter what I enter for my password, correct or not, is: We were unable to open this addressbook. This either means you have entered and incorrect URI, or the LDAP server is down. Neither of these things is true..unless I'm supposed to be using ldap://someserver as the server criteria? -- Dan TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Is there a way to mark a message as *important* when sending??
Hah! I did try that on the hopes that the flag would actually be set on outgoing, but it did not. :( Good idea though. On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 22:13, Matthias Hentges wrote: Am Fre, 2002-05-31 um 01.08 schrieb Austin Gonyou: Please, does anyone know if this can be done or not? On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 15:26, Austin Gonyou wrote: I can't seem to see it. TIA. I'm not sure but send later after writing the mail and clicking on the ! tab in the outbox message list on that mail *may* do the trick. I never tried that myself. -- Matthias Hentges Contact-Information: E-Mail@Home:[EMAIL PROTECTED] My Homepage:http://www.hentges.net You can get my public PGP or GnuPG key from http://www.hentges.net/keys.html -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Is there a way to mark a message as *important* when sending??
I can't seem to see it. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Is there a way to mark a message as *important*when sending??
Please, does anyone know if this can be done or not? On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 15:26, Austin Gonyou wrote: I can't seem to see it. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Is there a way to mark a message as *important* when sending??
The main reason I'm asking about it is for stuff like when the boss asks for something by a certain date, you have it, but he asks you later that day why you didn't send it to him cause he's got like 200 other emails to read through as well, most of which *not* marked important. So for urgent communication in this type of respect, it would be nice. Another reason I ask, is because if people on Lookout or other mail clients send mail with that attribute set, I see it set as such. I figured there *must* be some way of doing that. On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 18:44, Jonathan F. Dill wrote: No, but I think you can mark messages self important. Just kidding. Its just that I have seen maybe 2 people who use this feature and their e-mails to me are always marked important even though the content is not. I just ignore it. On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 19:08, Austin Gonyou wrote: Please, does anyone know if this can be done or not? On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 15:26, Austin Gonyou wrote: I can't seem to see it. TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill -- Jonathan F. Dill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) UMBI CARB IT Coordinator Experimental Support Site http://concept.umbi.umd.edu -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Configuring ldap against exchange 2000 fails all the time.
Does anyone have an example of what the search base should be. The button to pull search bases works..but when I login, I get an error about invalid url in ldap search. If anyone has experienced this before, I'd greatly appreciate some info. Evolution 1.1-dev. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Discussion about a featurere quest idea.
Well..I started there, but didn't see anyone reply about it. So I assumed it was the wrong forum. Thx much. On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 21:12, Not Zed wrote: From what I can tell, the label is *only* setting the colour, the same way you can set the colour using existing filters. It was probably some smart ui idea to hide the details of the fact that you're simply assigning a colour from the user (?) BTW this discussion belongs on evolution, not -hackers, i've moved it there. On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 07:30, Austin Gonyou wrote: I wanted to ask the list if they thought the following feature request, for the 1.1 branch would be a good idea. In 1.1 you can color messages based on an assigned *label*. I'm curious to know, if the filters will already in the future support this piece, but if not, then I'd ask that it *should* be. Like wise if the filters do this to maipulate mail, It would make filtering/searching large ammounts of email, based on assigned labels much quicker and easier, IMHO. Not to mention the fact that, great, I can assign labels, but now what can I *do* with them? :) TIA -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution-hackers] How many versions of camel-providers should I have?
In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got: 1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1 Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution-hackers] Discussion about a feature request idea.
I wanted to ask the list if they thought the following feature request, for the 1.1 branch would be a good idea. In 1.1 you can color messages based on an assigned *label*. I'm curious to know, if the filters will already in the future support this piece, but if not, then I'd ask that it *should* be. Like wise if the filters do this to maipulate mail, It would make filtering/searching large ammounts of email, based on assigned labels much quicker and easier, IMHO. Not to mention the fact that, great, I can assign labels, but now what can I *do* with them? :) TIA -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] How many versions of camel-providers should I have?
Thanks much. On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 16:48, Dan Winship wrote: On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:39, Austin Gonyou wrote: In /usr/lib/evolution/camel-providers I've got: 1.0 1.0.0.99 1.1 Do I *need* all that if I'm using 1.1-dev? No, just 1.1 is fine. -- Dan -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Sir Winston Churchill signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] This message crashes Evo (attached)
I found that if you have the preview pane open, then you can't filter it. Closing the preview pane and deleting/expunging worked just fine though. On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 07:47, Xavier Bestel wrote: Le ven 03/05/2002 à 13:39, Janus Christensen a écrit : On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:15, Erik Bågfors wrote: Just turn off the preview pane and you can go to the message in evolution and delete it. No need for another client. On my system, the email caused the email component to die (gracefully) while retrieving messages from my POP3 account. On mine, even just filtering it caused the mail component to die. Xav ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] This message crashes Evo (attached)
Did anyone have the following in their dmesg after evo crashed? __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0xf0/0) I noticed it after evo blew up several times in a row. On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 17:11, Bruce Mallett wrote: Gee thanks, you just brought my machine to its knees. Ron Guerin wrote: ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] This message crashes Evo (attached)
Here is a bit of strace when the problem happens: Error old_mmap(NULL, 536875008, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x8a767000 munmap(0x53301000, 927358976) = 0 mremap(0x4330, 268439552, 536875008, MREMAP_MAYMOVE) = 0x4330 munmap(0x8a767000, 536875008) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 1854717952, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory) brk(0x78692000) = 0x9dc6000 old_mmap(NULL, 1854717952, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory) old_mmap(NULL, 1854717952, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory) write(2, \n, 1) = 1 write(2, GLib, 4) = 4 write(2, -, 1)= 1 write(2, ERROR **: , 10) = 10 write(2, could not allocate 1854716080 by..., 35) = 35 write(2, \naborting...\n, 13) = 13 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [ABRT], NULL, 8) = 0 write(1, efore\nimpl_event = command_befor..., 194) = 194 kill(, SIGABRT) = 0 --- SIGABRT (Aborted) --- /Error Also, something interesting here is that my system swaps itself to death, that is of course until sigabrt is reached. I consider this a serious security bug. On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 17:11, Bruce Mallett wrote: Gee thanks, you just brought my machine to its knees. Ron Guerin wrote: ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Searching all local folders for 1 string?
How do I do this. I can't seem to find a way. Am I just missing something? TIA. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Searching all local folders for 1 string?
NP. THX On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 12:53, Russell Steinthal wrote: On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 12:14, Austin Gonyou wrote: How do I do this. I can't seem to find a way. Am I just missing something? It's not the most intuitive way of handling it in the world, IMHO, but you can use Create Virtual Folder From Search... on the Search menu to define a vfolder, and then open that folder for the results of the search. That means you need to delete the VFolder (note: *not* the messages in it) when you're done, however. I'm going to see if this is in Bugzilla, because it seems like a reasonable (and not to difficult to implement, given that the vfolder code is already there) feature. -- Russell Steinthal Columbia Law School, Class of 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Columbia College, Class of 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX System Administrator, nj.org -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Connector Exchange Version
Isn't the connector just interpreting the Exchange webpage? And thusly, it may half work if you've got web mail enabled on the exchange server? On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 12:00, David G. Simmons wrote: Well, I was SOOO happy that I was going to be able to ditch WinBlows (A *requirement* at my job) for Evolution, using the new Connector. I checked with my SysAdmin, and he told me we were running Exchange 2000, so I went out and purchased a license for the Connector. I got it installed, and could not connect to the Exchange Server. Dang. Upon further pressing my SA, it turns out that, well, we're not REALLY running EX2000, but 5.5. Am I totally screwed here? Do I have a Connector license I cannot use? Am I doomed to a life of misery and Windows Error messages? Thanks! dg ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution-hackers] Where does evo get it's mime-types from again?
I just modified the mimetypes for csv and doc files..but the new selections don't show up in evo. What's up? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution] Expunging not working on INBOX (IMAP).
I'm curious if this has anything to do with bug 17694. On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 17:40, Zot O'Connor wrote: I was able to expunge via telnet. Both with the UID statement, and with the simplier A101 EXPUNGE So now I am wondering why is evolution adding the UID and ranges? Looking at the RFC UID EXPUNGE is not a legitimate command (Only COPY, FETCH, or STORE). OK strike that, under RFC2539, there is an extension to UID. Looking at the server responses: * CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 ACL QUOTA LITERAL+ NAMESPACE UIDPLUS X-NON-HIERARCHICAL-RENAME NO_ATOMIC_RENAME AUTH=DIGEST-MD5 UNSELECT ID UIDPLUS is listed. So now I wonder if the message range is too big for cyrus, I mean it is 1760 chars big. Or is it evolution not waiting long enough? At a minimum it seems like evolution needs to look for the BAD response and then either send a full expunge, or send partial lists. It might be nicer to allow the user to day expunge these deleted notes. So looking around I see other people with this error: ... command\r\n Is Entourage using a non-standard IMAP command or one not implemented in Communigate? It's half-standard, it was there, but due to our error it was removed. Please see: 3.5.2 05-Jan-02 Bug Fix: IMAP: 3.5x versions did not support the UID EXPUNGE command. So, plz upgrade to 3.5.2 or later. ... According to RFC2359 if the server does not support the UID EXPUNGE the client is supposed to fall back to STOR or old EXPUNGE command. So it looks like Entourage is not falling back. Yes? ... http://asg.web.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc2359.html#sec-4.1 4.1 UID EXPUNGE Command Arguments: message set Data: untagged responses: EXPUNGE Result: OK - expunge completed NO - expunge failure (e.g. permission denied) BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid Page 3 The UID EXPUNGE command permanently removes from the currently selected mailbox all messages that both have the \Deleted flag set and have a UID that is included in the specified message set. If a message either does not have the \Deleted flag set or is has a UID that is not included in the specified message set, it is not affected. This command may be used to ensure that a replayed EXPUNGE command does not remove any messages that have been marked as \Deleted between the time that the user requested the expunge operation and the time the server processes the command. If the server does not support the UIDPLUS capability, the client should fall back to using the STORE command to temporarily remove the \Deleted flag from messages it does not want to remove. The client could alternatively fall back to using the EXPUNGE command, risking the unintended removal of some messages. Example:C: A003 UID EXPUNGE 3000:3002 S: * 3 EXPUNGE S: * 3 EXPUNGE S: * 3 EXPUNGE S: A003 OK UID EXPUNGE completed From http://asg.web.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc1730.html#sec-6.3.1 6.4.9 UID Command Arguments: command name command arguments Data: untagged responses: FETCH, SEARCH Result: OK - UID command completed NO - UID command error BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid The UID command has two forms. In the first form, it takes as its arguments a COPY, FETCH, or STORE command with arguments appropriate for the associated command. However, the numbers in the message set argument are unique identifiers instead of message sequence numbers. 6.4.3 EXPUNGE Command Arguments: none Data: untagged responses: EXPUNGE Result: OK - expunge completed NO - expunge failure: can't expunge (e.g. permission denied) BAD - command unknown or arguments invalid The EXPUNGE command permanently removes from the currently selected mailbox all messages that have the \Deleted flag set. Before returning an OK to the client, an untagged EXPUNGE response is sent for each message that is removed. Example:C: A202 EXPUNGE S: * 3 EXPUNGE S: * 3 EXPUNGE S: * 5 EXPUNGE S: * 8 EXPUNGE S: A202 OK EXPUNGE completed Note: in this example, messages 3, 4, 7, and 11 had the \Deleted flag set. See the description of the EXPUNGE response for further explanation. -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock
Re: [Evolution] LDAP Auto-completion slowdown from 1.0.0 - 1.0.1
Excellent. Thanks so much! On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 19:03, Chris Toshok wrote: On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 11:58, Austin Gonyou wrote: I've confirmed that Evo is indeed making ldap calls and trying to lookup from my ldap source. Does anyone have a basic setup that they would be willing to share with regards to accessing LDAP on Exchange 5.5 or 2000? My current lines look like: section path=/Addressbook/Completion entry name=uri type=string value=ldap://mail.internaldomain.com:389/dc=internaldomain,dc=com??one; / /section Through tcpdump, when typing a name *not* in my address book I see one request per letter typed. I just don't get the name to show up. I was hoping that someone is using Evo and LDAP lookup with exchange. If anyone has this info, I'd be happy if I could get a tip on this. is the ??one usual? What else should go there? Is there something else instead I should be using for '??' ? Yes, the ??one is usual. Some people, depending on the layout of their server, might use ??sub. Those ?s separate the root DN (dc=internaldomain, dc=com), the attributes the ldap server is supposed to return (these aren't parsed/used by the backend, so leave that blank), and the search scope (one). The behavior you're seeing where there's one request per letter typed should be changing soon - see the bug mentioned earlier in this thread. toshok TIA On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 08:02, Martin C. Messer wrote: I've just been able to upgrade to 1.0.2, and it seems the problem has gone away. On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 07:01, Martin C. Messer wrote: I put it at the top, inside the bonobo-config stanza. I found that first issuing 'killev' to stop all related evo processes made it easier to edit config.xmldb since bonobo continued to overwrite any changes I made while it was still running. I've also realized that bug 16457 (http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16457) might be a smart bug to follow. Thanks. On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 19:46, Austin Gonyou wrote: I tried using this code with 1.0.2, and I can't even get it to work. Did you put that stuff at the top, bottom, or middle of the evolution/config.xmldb? On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:26, Martin C. Messer wrote: Not sure if this is just my problem or a sign of something larger, but since I've moved from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 the address lookups from the composer form have slowed from 1-2 seconds to ~15 seconds. I'm using the config.xmldb trick from the support.ximian.com KB to turn on auto-completion against one of our internal LDAP servers. I went from using 1.0.0 to using 1.0.1 in a matter of minutes and the slowdown occurred immediately, so I don't believe there was a coincidental change to the LDAP server itself that would have caused the performance change. I don't maintain the LDAP server so I can't verify this. Regular address book auto-complete works the same as 1.0.0, nearly instant lookups. Any pointers? Thanks. -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] LDAP Auto-completion slowdown from 1.0.0 - 1.0.1
I've confirmed that Evo is indeed making ldap calls and trying to lookup from my ldap source. Does anyone have a basic setup that they would be willing to share with regards to accessing LDAP on Exchange 5.5 or 2000? My current lines look like: section path=/Addressbook/Completion entry name=uri type=string value=ldap://mail.internaldomain.com:389/dc=internaldomain,dc=com??one/ /section Through tcpdump, when typing a name *not* in my address book I see one request per letter typed. I just don't get the name to show up. I was hoping that someone is using Evo and LDAP lookup with exchange. If anyone has this info, I'd be happy if I could get a tip on this. is the ??one usual? What else should go there? Is there something else instead I should be using for '??' ? TIA On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 08:02, Martin C. Messer wrote: I've just been able to upgrade to 1.0.2, and it seems the problem has gone away. On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 07:01, Martin C. Messer wrote: I put it at the top, inside the bonobo-config stanza. I found that first issuing 'killev' to stop all related evo processes made it easier to edit config.xmldb since bonobo continued to overwrite any changes I made while it was still running. I've also realized that bug 16457 (http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16457) might be a smart bug to follow. Thanks. On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 19:46, Austin Gonyou wrote: I tried using this code with 1.0.2, and I can't even get it to work. Did you put that stuff at the top, bottom, or middle of the evolution/config.xmldb? On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:26, Martin C. Messer wrote: Not sure if this is just my problem or a sign of something larger, but since I've moved from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 the address lookups from the composer form have slowed from 1-2 seconds to ~15 seconds. I'm using the config.xmldb trick from the support.ximian.com KB to turn on auto-completion against one of our internal LDAP servers. I went from using 1.0.0 to using 1.0.1 in a matter of minutes and the slowdown occurred immediately, so I don't believe there was a coincidental change to the LDAP server itself that would have caused the performance change. I don't maintain the LDAP server so I can't verify this. Regular address book auto-complete works the same as 1.0.0, nearly instant lookups. Any pointers? Thanks. -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] red-carpet channels not working?
Yeah...if you're not on RC express, it seems to be slow as hell. On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 15:57, Zot O'Connor wrote: anyone else have troubles downloading from redcarpet? I am getting timeouts on most of the channels (but not all). -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] LDAP Auto-completion slowdown from 1.0.0 - 1.0.1
I tried using this code with 1.0.2, and I can't even get it to work. Did you put that stuff at the top, bottom, or middle of the evolution/config.xmldb? On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 17:26, Martin C. Messer wrote: Not sure if this is just my problem or a sign of something larger, but since I've moved from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1 the address lookups from the composer form have slowed from 1-2 seconds to ~15 seconds. I'm using the config.xmldb trick from the support.ximian.com KB to turn on auto-completion against one of our internal LDAP servers. I went from using 1.0.0 to using 1.0.1 in a matter of minutes and the slowdown occurred immediately, so I don't believe there was a coincidental change to the LDAP server itself that would have caused the performance change. I don't maintain the LDAP server so I can't verify this. Regular address book auto-complete works the same as 1.0.0, nearly instant lookups. Any pointers? Thanks. -- Martin Messer Information Systems Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] mail component crash
Is your mail server Exchange? On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 15:32, James Clayton Shoppa wrote: While downloading my mail (I receive a large quantity of e-mail every day) the latest version of Evolution reports the following error, in the form of a dialog box: Error The Evolution component that handles folders of type mail has unexpectedly quit. You will need to quit Evolution and restart in order to access that data again. All I can do is click ok in this window. At first I thought the problem might be due to some corrupt message on my server, so I telnet'ed in and read/deleted all my e-mail via elm. The problem repeated next time I used evolution, and does so consistently. Each time it unexpectedly quits at a different point of the mail transfer. Any help would be much appreciated, as is your prompt response. ~cclay ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Attachments
I've seen this occur when people drag-n-drop stuff into their mails from outlook. On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 14:10, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: -- Fake email from this address on the net. The real thing is signed with my public key. The key is available on request. - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Martin Skjöldebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jeffrey Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Evolution] Attachments Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 14:09:30 -0600 On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: converted to ascii? how so? what were the original types of these attachments? They were 2 Excel docs and a regular mail about a conference we were invited to. They looked like ascii representation of binary files with placeholders (like thefirstdoc.xls) for the attachments. Martin S -- Fake email from this address on the net. The real thing is signed with my public key. The key is available on request. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Attachments
Not that is really odd... On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 14:26, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote: On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 21:19, Austin Gonyou wrote: I've seen this occur when people drag-n-drop stuff into their mails from outlook. This was actually the other way round. From Evo to First Class, not Outlook. Martin -- Fake email from this address on the net. The real thing is signed with my public key. The key is available on request. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] latest CVS won't compile, again.
Scratch that. I did a make clean, cvs update again, then make. Now I get: e-shell-view.c: In function `class_init': e-shell-view.c:1176: `e_marshal_NONE__POINTER_POINTER_POINTER_POINTER' undeclared (first use in this function) e-shell-view.c:1176: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once e-shell-view.c:1176: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [e-shell-view.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 Was I in the middle of a check-in? On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 20:10, Austin Gonyou wrote: I've got openldap-devel, openldap, openldap-clients installed on my system, but I get the following: I think this is my last hurdle to getting a complete build so I can verify my bugs. Can someone please direct me on what I'm missing this time? ldap error ../addressbook/backend/pas/libpas.a(pas-backend-ldap.o): In function `view_destroy': make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/wombat' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 /ldap errors -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] What are the changes?
What is new in the most recent red-carpet updates? Has bug 17649 been fixed in that release? If not, could someone help me get CVS built. It's always something, usually something missing, and I can not yet build to completion. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution-hackers] Another build problem
After some work of updating my gal/libgal from cvs and installing that, I get the following error after quite some time into Evo compilation: make error -DEVOLUTION_IMAGESDIR=\/usr/share/images/evolution\ -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused -c addressbook-config.c addressbook-config.c: In function `addressbook_source_dialog_set_source': addressbook-config.c:151: structure has no member named `binddn' addressbook-config.c: In function `addressbook_source_dialog_get_source': addressbook-config.c:179: structure has no member named `binddn' make[5]: *** [addressbook-config.o] Error 1 /make error What's up with that? do I just need to update my evo tree again? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing file in cvs?
Damn..thanks. I've been trying to test the fix for a bug I entered. Damn..ok..well thanks. On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 05:34, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 04:08, Austin Gonyou wrote: during the make I get the following: snip Making all in importer make[3]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell/importer' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell/importer' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `e-shell-corba-icon-utils.c', needed by `e-shell-corba-icon-utils.lo'. Stop. /snip the file was actually added yesterday, so it seems anoncvs is not yet synced, which means you'll have to wait until it does :-( cheers -- Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/ -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing file in cvs?
Damn..thanks. I've been trying to test the fix for a bug I entered. Damn..ok..well thanks. On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 05:34, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 04:08, Austin Gonyou wrote: during the make I get the following: snip Making all in importer make[3]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell/importer' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell/importer' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `e-shell-corba-icon-utils.c', needed by `e-shell-corba-icon-utils.lo'. Stop. /snip the file was actually added yesterday, so it seems anoncvs is not yet synced, which means you'll have to wait until it does :-( cheers -- Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/ -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution-hackers] db.h error when configuring.
When running ./configure from CVS today(like 3 mins ago), I get the following: 'checking db3 header version... configure: error: Found db.h is not version 3.1.17' but I do have version 3.2.9 from RH 7.2. Should I file a bug against this or is it that evo will not compile unless I've got 3.1.17? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] db.h error when configuring.
Sorry, I missed that one. :) I'll go back and read. On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 15:31, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: You need 3.1.17 exactly. There was a whole thread on why just a few days ago... Jeff On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:19, Austin Gonyou wrote: When running ./configure from CVS today(like 3 mins ago), I get the following: 'checking db3 header version... configure: error: Found db.h is not version 3.1.17' but I do have version 3.2.9 from RH 7.2. Should I file a bug against this or is it that evo will not compile unless I've got 3.1.17? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] db.h error when configuring.
NP. Thanks for the reply. I got a bunch of others very similar to yours. I didn't see the thread in question, that's why I was asking. On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ARGH! Not again! Ok, to build evolution you must have db-3.1.17 installed somewhere. Don't worry ... the sources for this at sleepycat.com is only 1.9 MB and installed the library itself is only a scant 6KB. Evolution compiles against it statically. This has been done to death on the regular evolution list and you can find more on the topic there. The long and the short of it is yes, you can force it to use your newer db3, but if you upgrade db3 (or your distro does at a later date) it may wipe out your contacts. Use at your own risk. On 24 Jan 2002, Austin Gonyou wrote: When running ./configure from CVS today(like 3 mins ago), I get the following: 'checking db3 header version... configure: error: Found db.h is not version 3.1.17' but I do have version 3.2.9 from RH 7.2. Should I file a bug against this or is it that evo will not compile unless I've got 3.1.17? -- Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://used-blues.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution-hackers] db.h error when configuring.
Of course. My connection to the gnome website seems to be crap, so searching out there has been a chore to say the least. CVS seems to work just fine though. :( On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 19:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: you'll have to get it from gnome cvs I think cvs -z3 co soup Jeff On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 20:14, Austin Gonyou wrote: Ok..I'm dumb..where do I get the libsoup 0.6.99? On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ARGH! Not again! Ok, to build evolution you must have db-3.1.17 installed somewhere. Don't worry ... the sources for this at sleepycat.com is only 1.9 MB and installed the library itself is only a scant 6KB. Evolution compiles against it statically. This has been done to death on the regular evolution list and you can find more on the topic there. The long and the short of it is yes, you can force it to use your newer db3, but if you upgrade db3 (or your distro does at a later date) it may wipe out your contacts. Use at your own risk. On 24 Jan 2002, Austin Gonyou wrote: When running ./configure from CVS today(like 3 mins ago), I get the following: 'checking db3 header version... configure: error: Found db.h is not version 3.1.17' but I do have version 3.2.9 from RH 7.2. Should I file a bug against this or is it that evo will not compile unless I've got 3.1.17? -- Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://used-blues.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution-hackers] Missing file in cvs?
during the make I get the following: snip Making all in importer make[3]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell/importer' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell/importer' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/austin/cvs/evolution/shell' make[3]: *** No rule to make target `e-shell-corba-icon-utils.c', needed by `e-shell-corba-icon-utils.lo'. Stop. /snip I did a find within my cvs tree, but the file in question doesn't exist it seems. What's a good way around this, or does it exist somewhere? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Bug 17694
I've found more info on this bug. Just by observation, I've noticed that I can consistently kill my mail component if I'm looking at mail in a local folder for a very long period of time (3* my mail check interval, this is very noticeable if I set it to 1min.), and then click on my inbox on my local IMAP. It has died nearly everytime. It seems there is some kind of buffer overflow or something causing this. When I click on the inbox of my Imap server, and it dies, I ALWAYS have mail waiting for me but was not reported by evolution until after the restart. What could cause this? On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:35, Austin Gonyou wrote: It is on bugzilla..that is my bug, 17694. oh, sorry - missed that ;-) -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Bug 17694
Ever since I turned off the explicit timed checking of my IMAP accounts, I've no longer had a crash. I hope someone can look into this further. The bug ID is in the subject. On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 14:49, Austin Gonyou wrote: I've found more info on this bug. Just by observation, I've noticed that I can consistently kill my mail component if I'm looking at mail in a local folder for a very long period of time (3* my mail check interval, this is very noticeable if I set it to 1min.), and then click on my inbox on my local IMAP. It has died nearly everytime. It seems there is some kind of buffer overflow or something causing this. When I click on the inbox of my Imap server, and it dies, I ALWAYS have mail waiting for me but was not reported by evolution until after the restart. What could cause this? On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:35, Austin Gonyou wrote: It is on bugzilla..that is my bug, 17694. oh, sorry - missed that ;-) -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Bug 17694
Actually it crashed right after I sent this. Albeit I've had FAR fewer crashes. Even with my timed checking turned off however, Evolution still initiates a check of the IMAP server automatically anyway. Is this also a bug? On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 16:43, Austin Gonyou wrote: Ever since I turned off the explicit timed checking of my IMAP accounts, I've no longer had a crash. I hope someone can look into this further. The bug ID is in the subject. On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 14:49, Austin Gonyou wrote: I've found more info on this bug. Just by observation, I've noticed that I can consistently kill my mail component if I'm looking at mail in a local folder for a very long period of time (3* my mail check interval, this is very noticeable if I set it to 1min.), and then click on my inbox on my local IMAP. It has died nearly everytime. It seems there is some kind of buffer overflow or something causing this. When I click on the inbox of my Imap server, and it dies, I ALWAYS have mail waiting for me but was not reported by evolution until after the restart. What could cause this? On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:35, Austin Gonyou wrote: It is on bugzilla..that is my bug, 17694. oh, sorry - missed that ;-) -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Bug 17694
Can anyone say what's up with this bug? I don't see any change in it, though it's a fairly problematic bug as I have to close and restart evolution like 30 - 50 times a day. Please advise. Thank you. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it. Latin Proverb signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] gnome-pilot
I'm still unable to get the conduits on RH 7.1 with Evo 1.0.0.99 Latest CVS from RC. I've heard other people do have them. Is there an update to the ximian-setup-tools or something that I've not seen yet? On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 16:50, Seth Hollen wrote: I'm not sure what the permissions are supposed to be. Any help would be appreciated Seth On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 09:26, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 22:58, Seth Hollen wrote: Yes, I'd love for my visor to sync w/ evo!! I hear some have done it but I can never get it to work. gpiolotd always gives me gpilotd-WARNING **: Unable to bind to pilot Permissions on the port? -JP -- -- === JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ximian Inc. http://www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a great store of gold. Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] kerberos WORKING
Is there kerberos V support? ./configure --with-krb4=/opt/kerberos --with-db3=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.3.1 --prefix=/opt/evolutionkerb -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a great store of gold. Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Features slated for 1.2 ?
Yes, Is this listed somwhere? On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 20:06, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: It might be helpful if someone posted what features are scheduled for Evolution 1.2. Vladimir ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a great store of gold. Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Evolution] Send Later...goes...where?
Hey, Where do messages go when I hit send later and how do I get them back? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a great store of gold. Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] LDAP
I have not been able to do this. I have tried and tried, but nothing works. I ended up creating a contact under Other Contacts then I did a search for (just a space), and then did ctrl-a and coppied them all to Local Folders-Contacts(drag and drop). It also seems that I'm only able to display 100 names as well, but when using openldap, I can see more than that. Not sure if that's a bug or what. Either way, I'm happy with Evo being so nice and all, but disappointed that I don't have the following: 1. right click on any folder and have a Mark all as read in the folder flyout. 2. Address book sources not working correctly. So if I say that my only contact under Other Contacts is the primary adressbook source, then it will perform lookups on that BEFORE my Local Folders-Contacts. 3. More responsiveness from my timed checks for new mail. It checks, and I may not see that mail is there for several minutes, unless I'm watching my imap source constantly. (highlighted inbox all the time). Other than that it's ok. The mail component does crash constantly though,(only at work, never at home), and it seems to be related to auto-checking for new mail.(I've timed it) On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 18:57, Bob Hastings wrote: Is there anyone out there who has successfully gotten Evo to perform an LDAP lookup against an Exchange 5.5 server? Ximians bugzilla says that this has been long since fixed but I've never been able to get it to work. I've tried several other LDAP clients in addition to Outlook Express and they all work fine. But Evo is a no-go. Kinda sucks not being able to look at that Global Address List... ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have regard for your name, since it will remain for you longer than a great store of gold. Ecclesiastes, Aprocrypha msg03925/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 1.0 is released
Why was OpenSSL support Disabled? On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 15:07, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: * Disabled OpenSSL support. (NSS-based SSL will still work.) -- Ettore -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity. Horace Mann, address at Antioch College, 1859 msg00789/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 1.0 is released
Why was OpenSSL support Disabled? On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 15:07, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: * Disabled OpenSSL support. (NSS-based SSL will still work.) -- Ettore -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity. Horace Mann, address at Antioch College, 1859 msg04080/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Evolution] iCal + OutLook 2000
I know this is a dead horse, or at least it seems to be, but my boss cannot see any of the calendar.ics files sent to him properly. Outlook wants to open .ics files as textfiles in wordpad rather than doing something with them. My question is what is a list of the common problems associated with Outlook + receiving iCal attatchments. The ones I get in Evo, FROM outlook seem to work fine. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg03584/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] iCal + OutLook 2000
As a side note, my install under Win4Lin seems to work fine when I send iCal attatchments, so I'm not sure what the problem is with my boss's LookOut! On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 13:50, Austin Gonyou wrote: I know this is a dead horse, or at least it seems to be, but my boss cannot see any of the calendar.ics files sent to him properly. Outlook wants to open .ics files as textfiles in wordpad rather than doing something with them. My question is what is a list of the common problems associated with Outlook + receiving iCal attatchments. The ones I get in Evo, FROM outlook seem to work fine. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg03585/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] iCal + OutLook 2000
I think this is the part that is correct. He's running OL2K on Win2K, and I'm running OL2K on Win98(win4lin). It works just fine for me, but for him it seems to be messed up, and it seems like it's file association, but we don't know where/how to unscrew his system. It's so damn frustrating! :) Anyway, thanks for the info. On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 17:18, Damon Chaplin wrote: It may be that your boss has associated the .ics extension with WordPad, and that is overriding the iCalendar stuff in Outlook. I can't see any other reason why Outlook would open it in WordPad. Normally if it doesn't know what it is all you can do is save it to disk. Damon -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg03589/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: [Evolution] Appointments with Outlook
That's odd. I've got an installation which has no internet, and is corporate/workgroup and I can send/receive ical no problem. That's odd. I'm going to do some checking on this end too. On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 09:34, Erik Bågfors wrote: On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 15:59, Jeppe, Nils wrote: Hello Lonnie, I have sought out information on MS tech support and indeed: They say that iCal sending/receiving is available only in when running outlook 2k in internet only mode. Ah, gotta love lock-in-tactics. not. :-( What does internet only mode mean? I'm not using outlook but would like to be able to cooperate with people running it. /Erik -- Erik Bågfors | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Supporter of free software | GSM +46 733 279 273 fingerprint: A85B 95D3 D26B 296B 6C60 4F32 2C0B 693D 6E32 ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg03547/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Evolution] Outlook express dbx files
Outlook Express is in the rc1 importer. On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 18:51, Thomas Duffy wrote: On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 10:08, Gonyou, Austin wrote: How do I import those? Or, how do I make a mbx file from outlook express? I think there is a FAQ about this, but Evo does not do this by default...Netscape 4.x or maybe 6.2 for windoze will do it and then you can save them to other formats... -tduffy ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Outlook express dbx files
Most of the text of text messages is in there. I believe the spec is published on MS as well. On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 14:33, Trygve Falch wrote: On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 20:16, Austin Gonyou wrote: Outlook Express is in the rc1 importer. Yes, Outlook Express 4, but not Outlook Express 5. DBX-files are new with Outlook Express 5 and not surprisingly, they are all binaries. (looks like they merged .mbx + .idx into .dbx.) Would be nice if someone could figure them out though. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] latest snapshot shot?
Same here. There's some dependency the the current libevolution-importer.so isn't fulfilling. Or is it that the file is incomplete? On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 09:14, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote: evolution: relocation error: /usr/lib/libevolution-importer.so.0: undefined symbol: stat -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Changing Quotation String?
Perhaps, because of some people's preferences, they would prefer that, over pretty stuff. I like it the way it is, but again, in the OSS spirit, Choice is nice. On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: No, it's not possible. I suppose we could add the feature but I personally am not sure I like the idea. If people change the prefix, then it becomes impossible (not hard, but impossible) to colourize and/or do anything cool with quoted text in general. You'll notice that when you reply to a message, within the composer/message-view the quoted text is gray. This becomes impossible if we can't depend on the fact that the quoted text prefix is Feel free to add the feature request (assuming it's not already there) to bugzilla.ximian.com, however realise that if the feature is implemented it will make other features not necessarily work properly. Jeff PS. Wasn't there an internet standards draft that said quoted text must/should (whatever) use ? On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 10:09, Jim Meyer wrote: Hello! I was curious if it is possible to change the string which precedes quoted replies. Is it? =] --j -- Jim Meyer, Geek At Large [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution-hackers] Expunge feature missing?
When I rightclick on a folder under Local Folders or under another account, I don't get the options to Mark all as (un)/read. Is this something that is going to be in 1.0? or 1.1? Simple functionality, but would be very nice. As for my common LDAP issues, I just ended up dragging and dropping all my LDAP contacts into my Contacts under Local Folders. I'd prefer to lookup directly from our LDAP box, but this will do for now. :) -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution] LDAP contacts lookup for new mail
LDAP still is not being polled automatically when using Evo RC1. There is not even a check names button or anything like that. If there were at least a Check names button + hotkey, then Evo will be much more successful upon release than it will be otherwise. If other people are NOT seeing this behaviour, could I see your config.xmldb and see if you have an address book setting for LDAP? One other thing, when hitting the To: button, and it brings up the address book, I WANT my default to be the single LDAP source I'm using. Is there ANY way to do this? This is so frustrating, please help. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Talking to an Exchange LDAP server
I had a similar issue. I deleted all my contact sources and then added mine it. It seemed to be ok, more or less after that. Lemme know if auto-complete from that server works too, mine is only working half way, and I'd like to track it down so I can dump outlook 2k already. On Thu, 2001-10-25 at 10:39, Richard Wilkinson wrote: Hi, There's an Exchange server here with an address list that I'd like to access, but I can't figure out how to set the options properly in the dialog. Outlook tells me this: current server: EXCHANGE01 address book hierarchy path: \Global Address List So what do I enter into the address book sources dialog under the Advanced tab? Nothing seems to work! Any clues anyone? Rich ** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ** ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution-hackers] VFolder/saved search oddness
When I do a search on my Inbox and save that search as a vfolder, then go back to edit that search as I've saved it as well, all the wrong search criteria is in the boxes. Has anyone seen this? Is this fixed in cvs? I'm using Beta6 on RH 7.1. AUstin ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: LDAP (was: Re: [Evolution] still no contacts in 0.10: wrong db?)
This is why I'm confused. If this is an opensource project, then where is the free thinking?(in this matter.) I don't care WHO's LDAP is used, but it MUST be used, and for working towards a finished product, I would expect something to come out of all of this. It's easier I guess to say there's a licensing issue than to say, we've not really considered new things. I'd prefer to hear the latter than the former. As I stated, you can distribute 2 src rpms, one for Evolution-noldap and one with Evolution-ldap. As a prerequisite, we leave getting openldap-devel up to those who whish to recompile evolution, with ldap support. Why doesn't this make sense? I'm confused about this. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 13 May 2001, Mitchell Skinner wrote: On 14 May 2001 12:02:47 +0930, Not Zed wrote: On 13 May 2001 00:21:43 -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote: I'm rather disappointed that LDAP still isn't implemented. Can't there be a set of files downloaded together, or perhaps an evoltion-noldap rpm and evolution-ldap with accompanying openldap-client rpms? This is getting ridiculous! Uh, the licensing issue still hasnt' changed. Last I heard, someone had suggested the use of Mozilla's LDAP code, but I never saw anything more about that. Has anyone taken a look at this? I have, and it looks like the code is under the Netscape Public License, which according to the gnu.org license page is incompatible with the GPL. However, there is GPL mozilla code which links directly with this NPL code, so I'm confused. This certainly appears to be one of the most frequently requested items, and frankly it would also help me out at work. How hard is it to go down the hall and talk to the lawyers? Ximian does have lawyers, right? Perhaps the people at Sun ireland can shed some light here, since Netscape's LDAP stuff appears to have originated with iPlanet. I know there's at least one of you on this list. Mitch ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] New Snapshot and 1.4
Ahh..I see. I wasn't understanding the syntax in which we were speaking. Ok, so the program was requesting that amount(of course which doesn't exist) for allocation, and then pukes. Sorry, I thought we were speaking about diskspace. My mistake. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 30 Apr 2001, Sejal Patel wrote: hehehe. 1081004049 bytes is about 1.081 Gigs. I'm doubting that any download should be taking up that much space :) Seriously though, these kinds of errors happens a lot whenever a program is allocating memory to a pointer using an uninitialized value, meaning garbage in memory usually resulting in an ungoldly amount of memory being requested. On 30 Apr 2001 18:47:03 -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote: Have you done a df -k to see if /var has enough space to download stuff? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Matthew Schick wrote: Hey All, I just downloaded the latest Evo snapshot from RC and it fails with the following message: Glib-error **: Could not allocate 1081004049 bytes I was not able to update my GtkHtml package because RC tries to install both the snapshot and the current (old) package BTW, I am running a RH7 system Thanks - Matt ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Do we want timezones for tasks?
I was under the impression that iCal was a standard for Calanar Collaberation. -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Jamie Zawinski wrote: Damon Chaplin wrote: Unfortunately Unix has pretty poor support for timezones, Wow! That's a bold statement. Can you explain what your basis for comparison is? so we've had to use our own code to be compatable with the iCalendar spec. In what way does iCalendar require things the Olson code does not provide? As someone who has had to fix innumerable timezone-related bugs in the past, all resulting from either: marginal operating systems that did not use, or used a bastardized version of, the Olson code; or (less often) Unix applications misuing the Olson APIs; it fills my heart with a cold fear when I hear about someone else rolling their own. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution] Does LDAP support in evolution work?
Where can I get evolution SRC rpm? -- Austin Gonyou Systems Architect Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-796-9023 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 10 Apr 2001, Ross Burton wrote: On 10 Apr 2001 15:42:09 +0200, Berend De Schouwer wrote: I've been trying since 0.7 to get LDAP support working with evolution and our companies LDAP Server. To this point I've had no success and would like some suggestions on how to get it working. I'd like to get LDAP working, too. Which packages need recompiling? Just evolution? Yes. It takes a while, though. :-) [ snip ] ?xml version="1.0"? addressbooks contactserver namekcopmp02/name descriptionLDAP Server/description port389/port hostldap_server_hostname/host rootdn/ Shouldn't this be "rootdn/rootdn" ? No, rootdn/ is shorthand for an empty tag in XML. Ross ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
