Re: [Evolution] using evolution in multiple locations

2001-12-13 Thread Chris Ball

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:49:26AM -0800, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
 What method are people using when they need to use evolution in multiple
 locations.

IMAP.  I run Evolution at work, Evolution at home when it works, and
ssh-mutt when I'm away from both or my install breaks on an upgrade.

- ~C.
-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it.

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Configuration Database not found..AGAIN.

2001-12-09 Thread Chris Ball

On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:13:43PM -0700, Andrew Green wrote:
 I know this has been posted before, but I didn't see any real or 
 satisfactory solution so I'm asking myself.

I'm in the same position as Andrew.  I've had Evo working up to 1.0, and
since upgrading I'm unable to shift this error.  wombat/oafd both start
fine, there aren't any explicit linking problems.  As with Andrew, Í'd
really appreciate it if we could try and find some solutions to this.

- ~C.
-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it.

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] play sound or execute command upon reception of new message?

2001-12-05 Thread Chris Ball

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:45:24AM -0800, etienne sky wrote:
 is there a way to play a sound or execute a command
 when a new message is received (I have found no way
 myself)?  If not, could this feature be implemented
 soon?

It's in bugzilla, and I think I remember someone submitting a patch for
it, soon after 1.0 went to feature freeze.  Perhaps it could be applied?

- ~C.
-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it.

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-04 Thread Chris Ball

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:00:45AM -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
 Anyway, as far as Evolution is concerned, the Exchange server is just
 another backend that it can read and write iCalendar objects to/from.
 The Connector deals with the details of talking to the server and doing
 what translation is necessary. People using the Connector will still be
 able to do p2p scheduling with people who aren't, etc. Does that answer
 your question?

It does.  And I'd like to add my agreement with just about everyone else
who's posted in reply to my original mail.  With you all the way. 

- ~C.
-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it.

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?

2001-12-03 Thread Chris Ball

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
 This sounds really interesting.

.. furthermore, it sounds like a wonderful business model, given
that nothing else really does this yet.  It seems that even Evolution
doesn't, from the examples of discussion on here that I've seen - for
example, our calendaring at the moment is p2p, right?  How will Evo(GPL)
handle this when Evo(Proprietary) appears?  Is it really planned to
have a version of iCal that wanders around client-client as well as a
version that talks to servers?

It all sounds a bit, um, icky.  And I'm guessing that the development of
the connector isn't going to be at all publically discussed.  And I'm a
little frustrated that the mail client that I thought was this huge
effort on the part of the community to write the app that's going to 
be a /huge/ part in bringing Linux to the desktop is only going to be
the answer to Outlook in a Yeah, use Evolution.  It's cool.  Oh, but
you have to pay for Exchange interoperability. way, and that no-one
mentioned this before.  Feels almost like we have to start again, to
find another way of arguing Linux is free.  You can do _this_ with it.
to our bosses.  

Anyway.  Someone had to rant.  I think the more fair argument is that,
well, /I/ haven't put any code into Evo.  And most of us haven't.  And
there's no way in hell it'd be here if Ximian hadn't hired people and
all of this, so it's at least justified.  

But enough.  I'm off to try and get my 1.0 install alive again.

- ~C, a little disillusioned. 
-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
As to luck, there's the old miners' proverb: Gold is where you find it.

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Accessing folders (not thru Evolution)

2001-11-15 Thread Chris Ball

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:05:29AM -0500, John Harlow wrote:
 My question is, what options exist for me to access the data in my
 Evolution system directly, w/out having to go thru the application
 itself? 

They're all there, in:

~/evolution/local/Inbox/mbox# for locally stored
~/evolution/local/Inbox/subfolders/$folder/mbox # mail, as mbox files.

and

~/evolution/mail/imap/$address/$folder/ # for remote mail.

All are readable via a standard editor, or even by something like 'mutt'
with the -f switch and a filename.

Hope this helps, (and perhaps this should go in an FAQ of some sort?)

~C.

-- 
Chris Ball.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://printf.net/

___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Reply should come from source account

2001-11-14 Thread Chris Ball

On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 19:49, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 But pretend you are setting up evolution to check mail from your work
 address and your isp mail address, you'd want both accounts to use your
 isp's smtp server

It's a side point - I agree with the behaviour of 'guessing' an SMTP
server; but I do use different SMTP servers at home and work.  My ISP's
mail server only relays for hosts inside their network, which my work
machine isn't, and my work SMTP server does the same.

~C.

-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
 In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.  


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Return receipts

2001-11-13 Thread Chris Ball

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 18:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 No, Evolution doesn't support return receipts. It's probably already
 filed in the bug/feature tracker though (bugzilla.ximian.com).

Is there a patch waiting for post-1.0?  It's just an X-header, iirc.

~C.

-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
 In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.  


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Camel API?

2001-11-03 Thread Chris Ball

On Sat, 2001-11-03 at 14:05, Janne Morén wrote:
 As the Evolution code is approaching the utter zen-like stillness and
 stability expected of every 1.0 release, and I am in search of a new
 thesis-avoidance strategy, I'd thought I'd start to look into the
 possibility of a simple text-mode frontend to evolution (which is great
 when you're on the road and can only use SSH to get to your mail).

I still think this is a nice idea; but in case you hadn't realised, you
can already access your Evolution mailboxes from a console session.  Evo
stores mailboxes in mbox (or maildir, if you prefer) format, in
$evolution/local/Inbox/{mbox,Subfolders/*/mbox}, and you can pass these
as arguments to an MUA like mutt, or even less/more if you're stuck.

~C.

-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
 In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.  

 PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] Redhat 7.2

2001-10-22 Thread Chris Ball

On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 15:21, Janne Morén wrote:
 I'm about to install redhat 7.2, and I'm wondering if anybody has been
 able to install evolution (or, indeed Ximian Gnome) under the betas;
 will the 7.1 RPM:s work if I remove the original Gnome rpm:s?

While it's often not the most reliable news source, slashdot's article
on 7.2's release states the following:

 If you're upgrading from the previous Red Hat 7.1 and you're using
 Ximian GNOME, then you might want to erase all Ximian GNOME RPMS (use
 the command: rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep -i ximian` --nodeps to erase the
 RPMS). Red Hat's GNOME RPMS has been more tested then Ximian's one and
 there is a conflict between them. You cannot use Red-Carpet on Redhat
 7.2 as it will fail with the RPM libraries.

Not that I can make an immense amount of sense of the English or
technical meaning in there, but it seems that things aren't too well
supported at the moment.  I'm sure that RH7.2 is one of Ximian's main
target platforms, though, so it won't be too long before things are
fixed.

~C.

-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a
 In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.  

 PGP signature


Re: [Evolution] New problems with 0.15 and IMAP

2001-10-05 Thread Chris Ball

On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 20:35, Julia A. Case wrote:
 On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 03:17, Mikael Wahlberg wrote:
  And from time to time, Evo sort of freezes when I am reading an IMAP
  folder. 
 
 I was begining to think I was the only one seeing this (I saw it in both
 beta 4 and beta 5)  it seems that during IMAP scans at the end it just
 hangs (CPU usage goes to MAX and stays there for a period of time) 

Are you using sslwrap with IMAP?  I have huge troubles with IMAP as soon
as I turn on ssl, and few without; something to do with the ssl stream
handling.  Maybe.

~C.

-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Evolution's mbox support

2001-10-04 Thread Chris Ball

Hi, all.

Firstly, I've just upgraded to 0.15 from 0.12; congratulations to all
involved.

I've decided to install xbuffy on my laptop and have it run over X/ssh
to my work machine, reading ~/evolution/local/@folders/mbox - it seemed
like a good idea at the time.  xbuffy works fine in 'original mode';
giving the total mail count rather than unread.  The unread count,
though, seems to stay at 0 whether a message is unread or not.  On
further investigation, it seems Evolution doesn't change the 'Status:'
header at all.  Why is this?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.

-- 
$a=printf.net; Chris Ball | chris@void.$a | www.$a | finger: chris@$a


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution